Construction and content validation of educational material about stuttering
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i4.40925Keywords:
Stuttering; Health education; Speech, language and hearing sciences.Abstract
The purpose was to build and validate the content of illustrative material to advise family members and educators of children who stutter. Study with a methodological approach, following the steps recommended in the literature for the validation of educational material. Three groups of judges were selected: eight speech therapists, 10 early childhood educators and 10 family members of stuttering children and adolescents. The judges answered a self-administered questionnaire to judge the content, language, illustrations, layout and motivation of the materials. And, after reading the folder, they should mark one of the levels of agreement (Likert scale): (1) strongly disagree, (2) disagree, (3) neither disagree nor agree, (4) agree, (5) strongly agree, and then three dichotomous questions (yes/no) associated with a space for comments/ suggestions. After organizing and categorizing the data, the Content Validity Index (CVI) was applied to measure the degree of agreement between the judges with the cut-off point of >0.78. Adjustments were necessary in the illustration and layout categories (<0.78). Individual judges' suggestions and comments involving content and language were considered. The final version in A4 sheet, landscape mode and with three tabs, arranged as follows: cover, back cover with incidence and types (developmental, neurogenic and psychogenic), diagnosis and treatment, favorable attitudes and a reminder about stuttering bullying, in addition to the definition and main manifestations of stuttering. The material was constructed and its content validated, showing a high level of acceptance and agreement among the judges, being a support for health and education professionals and parents about the theme of stuttering. The next stage of the study contemplates the determination of the psychometric properties of the material, in order to validate the items and make it completely validated.
References
Alexandre D. S , Alpes M. F , & Mandrá P. P. A. (2020). Validação de cartilha sobre marcos do desenvolvimento da linguagem na infância. (2020) Rev. Cefac, 22 (1): 1-14.
Alves, A. M. A. (2017). Construção e validação de cartilha educativa para prevenção de quedas em idosos. 2017. 167 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Enfermagem) - Faculdade de Farmácia, Odontologia e Enfermagem, Universidade Federal do Ceará.
Andrade, C. R. F. (2004). Autopercepção da pessoa que gagueja quanto à avaliação de suas experiências e dos resultados de seu(s) tratamento(s) para a gagueira. CoDAS, 26 (5): 415-420.
Blood, G. W. (2011). Self-reported Experience of Bullying of Students Who Stutter: Relations With Life Satisfaction, Life Orientation, and Self-Esteem. Percept Mot Skills, 113 (2): 353-64.
Boyle, M. P, Dioguardi, L, & Pate, J. (2016). comparison of three strategies for reducing the publicstigma associated with stuttering. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 50 (1): 44–58.
Blumgart E , Tran, Y , & Craig, A. (2014). Social support and its association with negative affect in adults who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disord, 40 (1): 83‐92.
Carlino, F, Denari, F, & Costa, M. (2011). Programa de orientação fonoaudiológica para professores da educação infantil. Rev. Distúrb Comum, 23 (1): 15-23.
Celeste L. C, & Reis, C. (2013). Expressão de atitudes na fala com gagueira: percepção de falantes fluentes. Alfa, 57 (1): 275-293.
Celeste, L. C, Russo, L. C, & Fonseca, L. M. S. (2013). Influência da Mídia Sobre o Olhar Pedagógico da Gagueira: Reflexões Iniciais. Rev CEFAC, 15 (5): 1202-1213.
Costa, J. K. (2017). Comparação da performance de fala em indivíduos gagos e fluentes. CoDAS, 29 (2): 13-19.
Croft R, & Watson, J. (2019). Student clinicians’ and clients’ perceptions of the therapeutic alliance and outcomes in stuttering treatment. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 61 (1): 10-20.
Ehcer, I. C. (2005). The development of handbooks of health care guidelines. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem [online], 13(5) :754-757
Gonçales, M. B. (2007). Teste de Papanicolau: construção e validação de material educativo para usuárias de serviços de saúde. 2007, 88f. Dissertação (Mestradoem Ciências) - Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Escola de Medicina.
Freitas, M. F. (2010(). Modelos de comunicação e uso de impressos na educação em saúde: uma pesquisa bibliográfica. Interface (Botucatu) [online], 15(36) :243-256.
Hoffmann, T, & Warral, L. (2004). Designing effective written health education materials: considerations for health professionals. Disability and rehabilitation, 26 (19): 1166-1173
Jenkins, H. (2010). Attitudes of teachers towards dysfluency training and resources. International journal of speech-language pathology, 12 (3) 253-258,
Langevin, M, & Prasad, N. G. (2012). A stuttering education and bullying awareness and prevention resource: a feasibility study. Language, speech, and hearing services in schools, 43 (3): 344-358.
Lobiondo-Wood, W. (2001). Pesquisa em enfermagem: métodos, avaliação crítica e utilização. Guanabara-Koogan, (4a ed.).
Mandrá, P. P. (2017). Ações educativas em saúde: satisfação em relação à campanha de atenção à gagueira. Arquivos de Ciências da Saúde (FAMERP), 24 (1): 86-92.
Moreira, M. F, Nobrega, M. M. L, & Silva, M. I. T. (2003).. Comunicação escrita: contribuição para a elaboração de material educativo em saúde. Rev. bras. enferm. [online], 56 (2) 184-188.
Moura, D. J. M. (2017). Construção de cartilha sobre insulinoterapia para crianças com diabetes mellitus tipo 1. Rev. Bras. Enferm., 70 (1): 7-14.
Oliveira, S. C. L, Fernandes, M. V. O, Carvalho, A. F. (2014). Construção e validação de cartilha educativa para alimentação saudável durante a gravidez. Revista Latino- Americana de Enfermagem, 22 (4) 1-11.
Olivera, C. (2010). Orientação familiar e seus efeitos na gagueira infantil. Revista Da Sociedade Brasileira De Fonoaudiologia, 15 (1): 115-124.
Reberte, L. M., Hoga, L. A. K., Gomes, A. L. Z. (2012) Process of construction of an educational booklet for health promotion of pregnant women. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem, 20(1), 101-108.
Richels C, Counture E. (2007). Stuttering and related disorders of fluency, (3a ed.), cap. 5.
Silva, L. k. (2016). Gagueira na escola: efeito de um programa de formação docente em gagueira. CoDAS, 28 (3) :261-268.
Unicomb, R. (2020). Prevalence and features of comorbid stuttering and speech sound disorder at age 4 years. J Commun Disord. 84 (1): 1-10.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Camila Furukawa Kira; Matheus Francoy Alpes; Patrícia Pupin Mandrá
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
