Large animals as experimental models of critical size bone defects studies: a protocol for a systematic review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i5.41509

Keywords:

Orthopedic Implants; Biomaterials; Sheep; Goat; Fractures.

Abstract

Introduction: animal models are essential to evaluate the biocompatibility, tissue response and mechanical function of orthopedic materials used in the treatment of critical size bone defects. Objective: to present a systematic review protocol to identify and summarize the experimental approach for pre-clinical trials of critical size bone defects in large animals. Methods: the protocol was developed based on Preferred for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) Guidelines. The bibliographic survey will be carried out in PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Google Scholar databases. Pre-clinical studies in English, Portuguese or Spanish that uses large animal as models of critical size bone defects will be considered. The articles will be analyzed by two reviewers, independently. In case of divergences, the third reviewer will be consulted. The systematic review will be based on Preferred Reporting Items For Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Guidelines. Final considerations: The proposed systematic review is necessary for the standardization of experimental studies in critical size bone defects.

Author Biographies

Marilia Nunes Cardoso, Universidade de São Paulo

Estudante de Pós-Graduação em Clínica Cirúrgica Veterinária / FMVZ-USP

Anderson Fernando de Souza, Universidade de São Paulo

Estudante de Pós Graduação em Clínica Cirúrgica Veterinária / FMVZ-USP

André Luis do Valle De Zoppa, Universidade de São Paulo

Professor Associado do Departamento de Cirurgia / FMVZ-USP

References

Anderson, M. L. C., Dhert, W. J. A., De Bluijin, J. D., Dalmejer, R. A. J., Leeenders, H., Van Blitterswijk, C. A., Verbout, A. J. (1999). Critical Size Defect in The Goat’s Os Ilium. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 364, 231-239

Bahraminasb, M. (2020) Challenges on Optimization of 3D-printed bone scaffolds. Biomedical Engineering Online, 19 (69)

Boot, W., Foster, A. L., Guillaume, O., Eglin, D., Schmid, T., D´Este, M., Zeiter, S., Richards, R. G., Moriarty, T. F. (2022) An Antibiotic-Loaded Hydrogel Demonstrates Efficacy as Prophylaxis and Treatment in a Large Animal Model of Orthopaedic Device Related Infection. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 12

Bornert, F., Clauss, F., Hua, G. Q., Idoux-Gillet, Y., Keller, L., De Grado, G. F. (2021) Mechanistic Illustration: How Newly-Formed Blood Vessels Stopped By The Mineral Blocks of Bone Substitutes Can Be Avoided By Using Innovative Combined Therapeutics. Biomedicines, 9 (952)

Hirata, H., Zhang, N., Ueno, M., Barati, D., Kushioka, J., Shen, H., Tsubosaka, M., Toya, M., Lin, T., Huang, E. (2022). Ageing Attenuates Bone Healing By Mesenvhymal Stem Cells in a Microribbon Hydrogel With A Murine Long Bone Critical-Size Defect Model. Immun. Ageing, 19 (14)

Keating, J. F., Simpson, A. H. R. W., Robinson, C. M. (2005) The Manegement of Fractures With Bone Loss. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 87, 142-150

Leung, R. S., Siu, W. S., Cheung, N. M., Lui, P. Y., Chow, D. H. K., James, A., Qin, L. (2001) Goats as an Osteopenic Animal Model. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 16, (12), p.2348-2355

Migliorini, F., La Padula, G., Torsiello, E., Spieza, F., Oliva, F., Maffulli, N. (2021) Strategies for Large Bone Defect Reconstruction After Trauma, Infections or Tumour Excision: Comprehensive Review Of The Literature. European Journal of Medical Research, 26 (118)

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G. (2009) Preferred Reporting Items For Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement.The BMJ

Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L. A. (2015) Preferred Reporting Items For Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 Statement. Systematic Reviews, 4, (1)

Nauth, A., Schemitsch, E., Norris, B., Nollin, Z., Watson, J.T. (2018) Critical-Size Bone Defects: Is There a Consensus for Diagnosis and Treatment? Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 32 (1), 7-11

Nauth, A., Mckee, M. D., Einhorn, T. A., Watson, T., Li,, P., Schemitsch, E. H. (2011) Managing Bone Defects. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 25(8), 462-466

Newman, E., Turner, A. S., Wark, J. D. (1995) The Potential of Sheep For The Study of Osteopenia: Current Status and Comparison With Other Animal Models. Bone, 16, (4), 277-284

Reichert, J. C., Saifzadeh, S., Wullschleger, M. E., Epardi, D. R., Schutz, M.A., Duda, G. N., Schell, H., Van Griensven, M., Redl, H., Dutmacher, D. W. (2009) The Challenge of Establishing Preclinical Models for Segmental Bone Defect Research. Biomaterials, 30, 2144-2163

Pearce, A. I., Rechards, R. G., Milz, S., Schneider, E., Pearce, S. G. (2007) Animal Models For Implant Biomaterial Research In Bone: A Review. European Cells and Materials, 13, 1-10

Schimandle, J. H. & Boden, S. D. (1994) The Use of Clinical Models to Study Spinal Fusion. Spine Update, 19 (17), 1998-2006

Scmitz, J. P. & Hollinger, J. O. (1986) The Critical Size Defect as an Experimental Model for Craniomandibulofacial Nonunions. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 205, 299-308

Sparks, D. S., Saifzadeh, S., Savi, F. M., Dlaska, C. E., Berner, A., Henkel, J., Reichert, J. C., Wullschleger, M., Ren, N, J., Cipitria, A., McGovern, J. A., Steck, R., Wagels, M., Woodruff, M. A., Schuetz, M. A., Hutmacher, D. W. A. (2020) Preclinical Large-Animal Model For The Assessment Of Critical-Size Load-Bearing Bone Defect Reconstruction. Nature Protocols, 15, 877-924

Taguchi, T., Lopez, M. J. (2021) An Overview of De Novo Bone Generation In Animal Models. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 39, 7-21

Williams, D. F. On Nature of Biomaterials. (2009). Biomaterials, 30, 5897-5909

Downloads

Published

10/05/2023

How to Cite

CARDOSO, M. N. .; SOUZA, A. F. de .; DE ZOPPA, A. L. do V. . Large animals as experimental models of critical size bone defects studies: a protocol for a systematic review. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 12, n. 5, p. e10912541509, 2023. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v12i5.41509. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/41509. Acesso em: 16 nov. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 5

Section

Note Preview

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Marilia Nunes Cardoso; Anderson Fernando de Souza; André Luis do Valle De Zoppa

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.