Comparative analysis between performing a feet examination of people with diabetes and the use of the CARPeDIA application for the prevention of diabetic foot ulcer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v13i1.44761Keywords:
Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetic foot; Prevention; Ulcers.Abstract
Introduction: The complications of Diabetes Mellitus can be diverse and can develop quickly, with diabetic foot ulcers being the highlight in this research. Objective: To carry out a comparative analysis between the use of the CARPeDIA application and the results of examining the feet of people with diabetes. Method: descriptive study, with a quantitative approach, of comparative analysis, carrying out a comparative investigation between the use of the CARPeDIA application and the inspection of the feet of people with diabetes. The data were collected at the Centro Universitário de Lavras, on the days of the extension project Pé em dia = Pé com vida (CAAE 60224222.2.0000.5116). Results: the results were able to extract data presented by the use of the application and the results obtained during the nursing consultation. The research had a sample of 20 participants, it was possible to observe a female audience, a profile of elderly people and those with type 2 diabetes. It should be noted that the use of the app and the examination of patients' feet are complementary. The app helps the patient identify the risk of ulcers and promotes self-care, and the exam complements the analysis by identifying changes already installed. Final considerations: The comparative analysis between carrying out the exam and using the application is essential in preventing ulcers in patients with diabetic foot.
References
Andrade et al. (2019). Caracterização e tratamento de úlceras do pé diabético em um ambulatório. Rev Fun Care Online. 11(1), 124-128. https://seer.unirio.br/index.php/cuidadofundamental/article/view/6504/pdf.
Arruda, C.et al. (2021). Tecnologia Educativa para Cuidados e Prevenção do Pé Diabético. Ciênc. cuid. saúde, Epub. 20(50115). http://www.revenf.bvs.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-38612021000100222.
Brasil. (2022). Ministério da Saúde. Complicações do Diabetes Mellitus. Manual do Ministério da Saúde.
Brasil. (2022). Ministério da Saúde. Diabetes Mellitus. Manual do Ministério da Saúde. https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/assuntos/saude-de-a-a-z/d/diabetes#:~:text=A%20melhor%20forma%20de%20prevenir,doen%C3%A7as%20cr%C3%B4nicas%2C%20como%20o%20c%C3%A2ncer.
Brasil. (2016). Ministério da Saúde. Estratégias para o cuidado da pessoa com doença crônica. Manual do Pé Diabético. Brasília.
Brehmer. L. et al. (2021). Diabetes mellitus: estratégias de educação em saúde para o autocuidado. Rev enferm UFPE on line. 15 (1). https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/revistaenfermagem/article/view/246321/37465.
Dias. S. et al. (2018). Níveis de conhecimento de pacientes diabéticos sobre a Diabetes Mellitus tipo II. Revista Interdisciplinar. 11(3), 14-21. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/6763762.pdf.
Ferreira A. C. B. H, Ferreira D. D, Barbosa B. H. G., et al. (2023). Neural network-based method to stratify people at risk for developing diabetic foot: A support system for health professionals. PLoS One. 18, e0288466. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37440514/.
Ferreira A. C. B. H., Ferreira D. D., Oliveira H. C., Resende, I. C. D. E., Anjos, A., & Lopes, M. H. M. (2020). Competitive neural layer-based method to identify people with high risk for diabetic foot. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 120(103744). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103744.
Ferreira, A. et al. (2021). Interdisciplinaridade no Contexto das Doenças dos pés no Diabetes: Tratamentos Clínicos, Políticas Públicas e Tecnologias em Saúde. EDUERN, 19-38. https://diabetes.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/livro-interdisciplinaridade-pes-diabeticos.pdf.
Ferreira, R. (2020). Pé diabético. Parte 1: Úlceras e Infecções. Rev Bras Ortop. 55 (4), 389-96. https://www.rbo.org.br/detalhes/4305/pt-BR/pe-diabetico--parte-1--ulceras-e-infeccoes-.
Franco, M. (2000). Quando nós somos o outro: Questões teórico-metodológicas sobre os estudos comparados. Educação e Sociedade, ano XXI, 21(72).
Internation Diabetes Federation. (2021). Atlas de Diabetes da IDF.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Censo Brasileiro de 2010. (2016). Minas Gerais: IBGE. https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/mg/lavras/pesquisa/23/25124.
Lira, J. et al. (2020). Avaliação do risco de ulceração nos pés de pessoas com diabetes mellitus na atenção primária. Reme: Rev. Min. Enfermagem. 24 (1327). http://www.revenf.bvs.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-27622020000100249.
Pereira, A. S et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. UFSM. https://www.ufsm.br/app/uploads/sites/358/2019/02/Metodologia-da-Pesquisa-Cientifica_final.pdf.
Récchia, M. et al. (2019). Avaliação fisioterapêutica dos pés e do grau de risco de desenvolvimento de ulcerações em indivíduos diabéticos fisicamente ativos. Artigo Original. https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/biblio-1281854.
Schaper. N. et al. (2023). Diretrizes Práticas Sobre a Prevenção e o Tratamento da Doença do Pé Relacionada ao Diabetes. IWGDF.
Schneider, S., & Schmitt, J. C. (1998). O uso do método comparativo nas Ciências Sociais. Cadernos de Sociologia. 9, 49-87.
Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia. (2021). Onicomicose. https://www.sbd.org.br/cuidados/onicomicose/#:~:text=A%20onicomicose%20%C3%A9%20uma%20infec%C3%A7%C3%A3o,frequ%C3%AAncia%20do%20que%20as%20m%C3%A3os.
Sociedade Brasileira de Diabetes. (2019). Diretrizes da Sociedade Brasileira de Diabetes 2019-2020. Clannad, p. 419. https://www.saude.ba.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Diretrizes-Sociedade-Brasileira-de-Diabetes-2019-2020.pdf.
Sociedade Brasileira de Diabetes. (2016). Diabetes Mellitus: Manual do Exame dos Pés. Grupo Santa Casa Belo Horizonte. https://faculdadesantacasabh.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/MANUAL-DO-EXAME-DOS-PES-2016.pdf.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Érica Mascarenhas Toledo; Ana Cláudia Barbosa Honório Ferreira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
