Evaluation of the distribution of dentistry specialists in Dentística in Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i7.4520Keywords:
Dental Staff; Dentistry; Operative; Job Market.Abstract
The objective is to evaluate and characterize the distribution in Brazil of dentists who have registered with the Federal Council of Dentistry as specialists in Dentística ou Dentística Restauradora, providing a view of the labor market. Data were collected based on documentary research from public archives, with quantitative and percentage characterization and presentation of results in the form of descriptive statistics. Of the 333,030 dentists registered throughout the country, only 6,363 have records as specialists in Dentística ou Dentística Restauradora, corresponding to approximately 2%. Four of the five states with the lowest percentage of records in the studied specialties are from the North of the country, while the five brazilian states with the highest percentage are from the Southeast and South, with São Paulo occupying the first position. The Northeast region proportionally shows itself as the least competitive and most promising for specialists in Dentística ou Dentística Restauradora, in contrast to the Midwest region. It is concluded that the studied specialties are extremely promising, since they are essential for the development of excellent dentistry, in addition to the need to pay attention to the most favorable regions and states for the professional development of these specialists, since there are significant differences in terms of spatial distribution in the country.
References
Brasil. Conselho Federal de Odontologia. Resolução CFO 185/1993. [Internet]. Acesso em 13 de maio de 2020, em http://www.forp.usp.br/restauradora/etica/rcfo185_93.htm#anexos.
Brasil. Conselho Federal de Odontologia. Resolução CFO 22/2003. [Internet]. Acesso em 13 de maio de 2020, em http://www.crosp.org.br/profissionais/servicos/utilidade/especialidades/.
Brasil. Conselho Federal de Odontologia. Resolução CFO 63/2005. [Internet]. Acesso em 13 de maio de 2020, em: http://cfo.org.br/website/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/consolidacao.pdf.
Costa, D. S., Rocha, M. P. O. (2017). Cirurgião-Dentista e o mercado de trabalho no brasil: uma revisão sistemática da literatura. Id on Line Rev Mult Psic, 11(38), 102-114.
Ferreira, N. P., Ferreira, A. P., Freire, M. C. M. (2013). Mercado de trabalho na Odontologia: contextualização e perspectivas. Rev Odontol UNESP, 42(4), 304-309.
Figueirêdo Júnior, E. C., Pereira, J.V. (2019). Análise e caracterização do panorama da distribuição de Cirurgiões-Dentistas no Brasil por especialidades odontológicas. Arch Health Invest, 8(9), 465-471.
Figueirêdo Júnior, E. C., Uchôa, N. C., Pereira, J.V. (2019). Análise e caracterização do panorama da distribuição de Cirurgiões-Dentistas no Brasil. Arch Health Invest, 8(2), 63-67.
IBGE: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. [Internet] 2010. Acesso em 15 de abril de 2020, em: https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/panorama.
Mathias, M. P., Casani, E., Sagaz, S. M., & Lucietto, D. A. (2016). Oferta de cirurgiões-dentistas e faculdades no Brasil: repercussões sobre a prática odontológica. In: X Mostra de Iniciação Científica e Extensão Comunitária e IX Mostra de Pesquisa de Pós-Graduação da IMED 2016, 1-11.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
