Toward an epistemology of criminalistics: Deconstructing some foundational myths
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v13i6.46168Keywords:
Criminalistics; Forensic science; Forensic sciences; Epistemology; Sydney Declaration.Abstract
The definition of the nature of criminalistics and forensic science, as well as its principles and postulates, has been the subject of intense debate in international literature. The aim of this work was to analyze some concepts widely accepted in national literature related to the definition of the basic principles of criminalistics and/or forensic science. In the first part of the article, a survey was made of the principles of forensic science and/or criminalistics found in national and international literature. In the second part, the historical consolidation of the principles of criminalistics adopted in Brazil was analyzed. In the third part, the principles consolidated in the national community of forensic scientists were confronted with international discussions on the nature of forensic science and the basic concepts of science and scientific investigation. The international community tends to define forensic science as a science that shares many of the rigorous procedures derived from natural sciences, but which also presents its own postulates and methodologies. Among them, the historical reconstruction of the criminal event, based on rigorous analysis of the traces. Conversely, the principles commonly accepted by the forensic scientist community in Brazil present some important conceptual inconsistencies, as they are based on traditional and empirical knowledge, passed from generation to generation (Cunha, 1987). Thus, certain concepts consolidated in the Brazilian forensic science community seem to go against classical definitions in the field of science. Reviewing these concepts is essential, as ideas are associated with practices and worldviews.
References
Albarracin, R. (1971). Manual de Criminalística. Editorial Policial.
Aragão, R. F. (2006). Vestígio Material e Imprecisão – Criminalística Estática, Dinâmica e Pós-moderna. IV Seminário Brasileiro de Balística Forense e Perícias de Crimes Contra a Vida, Recife.
Aragão, R. F. (2016). O Código de Ética e a Doutrina da Perícia Criminal Brasileira. In: Tocchetto, Domingos & Espindula, A. (org), Criminalística, Procedimentos e Metodologias. (3a ed.). Ed. Millennium.
Cavalcanti, A. (1987). Criminalística Básica. (2a ed.). Ed. Litoral, 224pg.
Ceccaldi, P. F. (1971). La Criminología. In: Colección ¿qué sé? Nº 49. Barcelona, Espanha: Editora Oikos-tau, 126p.
Cleland, C. (2002). Methodological and Epistemic Differences between Historical Science and Experimental Science. Philos. Sci., 69(3), 474-496.
Cordioli, C. (2003). A Criminalística brasileira: sua doutrina. Anais do XVII Congresso Nacional de Criminalística, Londrina: Área Temática Criminalística, 1-27.
Crispino, F.; Roux, C.; Delémont, O. & Ribaux, O. (2019). Is the (traditional) Galilean science paradigm well suited to forensic science? WIREs Forensic Sci., 1, e1349.
Crispino, F.; Weyermann, C.; Delémont, O.; Roux, C. & Ribaux, O. (2022). Towards another paradigm for forensic science? WIREs Forensic Sci., 4, e1441.
Cunha, B. P. (1987). Doutrina da Criminalística Brasileira. Ed. Ateniense.
De Forest, P. R. (1999). Recapturing the essence of criminalistics. Sci. Justice, 39(3), 196-208.
De Forest, P. R.; Gaensslen, R. & Lee, H.C. (1983). Forensic Science: An introduction to Criminalistics. McGraw Hill.
Dror, I. & Hampikian, G. (2011). Subjectivity and bias in forensic DNA mixture interpretation. Sci. Justice. 51(4), 204-208.
Espindula, A. (2014). Perícia Criminal e Cívil: uma visão geral para peritos e usuários de perícia. (4a ed.). Editora Millennium, 480p.
Fachone, P. & Velho, L. (2007). Ciência Forense: Interseção Justiça, Ciência e Tecnologia. Revista Tecnologia e Sociedade., 3(4), 139-161.
Garrido, R. G. & Giovanelli, A. (2015). Ciência Forense: Uma Introdução à Criminalística. (2a ed.). Projeto Cultural/FAPERJ, 214p.
Gil, A. C. (2017). Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. (6a ed.). Ed. Atlas AS.
Ginzburg, C. (1984). Morelli, Freud, and Sherlock Holmes: Clues and scientific method. In U. Eco & T. Sebeok (Eds.), The sign of three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce (pp. 81–118), Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Giovanelli, A. (2022). Declaração de Sydney e os novos rumos da Criminalística: repensando práticas e identidades. Evidência, o Jornal da Perícia, 23(4), 5-14.
Giovanelli, A. (2023A). The forensic´s scientist craft: towards an integrative theory. Part 1: microapproach. Aust. J. Forensic Sci., 1-15. Doi: 10.1080/00450618.2023.2231991.
Giovanelli, A. (2023B). The forensic´s scientist craft: towards an integrative theory. Part 2: meso and macroapproach. Aust. J. Forensic Sci., 1-16. Doi: 10.1080/00450618.2023.2283418.
Giovanelli, A. (2023C). A busca pela verdade real e a realidade da busca policial: A perícia do Rio de Janeiro no fogo cruzado. Rev. Estud. Empír. Direito, 10, 1-38.
Giovanelli, A.; Santos, A.; Torres, P.A. & Mayer, R.D. (2022). Coleta de DNA em locais de crime: procedimentos e aplicações. Editora Dialética, 116pg.
González, R. M. (2002). Manual de Introduccion a la Criminalistica. (10a ed.). Editorial Porrúa.
Guzmán, C. A. (2011). Manual de Criminalistica. (2a ed.). Editorial B de F,
Harris, H. A. & Lee, H. C. (2019). Introduction to Forensic Science and Criminalistics. (2ª ed.). Boca CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
Harzing, A. W. & Wal, R. (2008). Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis. Ethics Sci. Environ. Politics., 8(1), 61-73.
Houck, M. M. & Crispino, F. (2013). Principles of Forensic Science. In: M. M. Houck editor. Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences. Elsevier, 278-281.
Houck, M. M. & Siegel, J. (2015). Fundamentals of Forensic Science. (3ª ed.). Academic Press.
Houck, M. M. (2010). An Investigation into the Foundational Principles of Forensic Science. [Degree of Doctor of Philosophy]. Australia: Curtin University of Technology.
Inman, K. & Rudin, N. (2002). The origin of evidence. Forensic Sci. Int., 126, 11-16.
Jayaprakash, P. T. (2013). Practical relevance of pattern uniqueness in forensic science. Forensic Sci. Int., 231(1-3), 403.e1-403.e16.
Kirk, P. L. (1963). The ontogeny of Criminalistics. J. Crim. Law Crim., 54(2), 235-238.
Locard, E. (1920). L’Enquete criminelle et les Methodes scientifiques. Paris: Flammarion.
Martin, B. & Linacre, A. (2020). Direct PCR: A review of use and limitations. Sci. Justice. 60(4), 303-310.
Miranda, M. D.; Buzzini, P.; De Forest, P.R. & Willis, S. (2023). J. Forensic Sci., 68(5), 1835-1842.
Nuñez, P. M. (2016). Técnicas interpretativas em la Criminalistica moderna. Revista Skopein, 4(11), 41-47.
Osterburg, J. W. (1968). The Crime Laboratory: Case Studies of Scientific Criminal Investigation. Indiana University Press.
Popper, K. R. (1972). A lógica da pesquisa científica. Cultrix/Edusp.
Porras, L. E.; Segovia, L. H. & Pincay, W. E. (2019). Importancia de la investigación judicial y criminalística en la determinación de la veracidad del delito. Universidad y Sociedad., 11(4), Epub 02.
Porto, G. (1976). Manual de Criminalística. Ed. Resenha Universitária.
Prueger, E. (2010). Criminalística aplicada: investigación metanalítica em homicidios. Neuquén, Argentina.
Rabello, E. (1996). Curso de Criminalística. Ed. Sagra Luzzato.
Ristenbatt, R. R.; Hietpas, J.; De Forest, P. R. & Margot, P. A. (2022). Traceology, criminalistics, and forensic science. J. Forensic Sci., 67(1), 28–32.
Rodrigues, C. H. P.; Amaral, M. E. A.; Mariotto, L. S.; Castro, J. S.; Mascarelli, M. H. & Velho J. A. et al. (2022). Ciência Forense ou Ciências Forenses? Uma análise conceitual. Res. Soc. Dev., 11(12), e177111234215.
Rosa, C .T. A. (2015). Vestígios Psicológicos ou Comportamentais na Cena de Crime: uma Evidência Subutilizada no Arcabouço Pericial Brasileiro. Rev. Bras. Criminalística, 4(3), 15-27.
Roux, C.; Bucht, R.; Crispino, F.; De Forest, P R.; Lennard, C.; Margot, P.; Miranda, M. D.; NicDaeid, N.; Ribaux, O.; Ross, A. & Willis, S. (2022). The Sydney Declaration – Revisiting the essence of forensic science through its fundamental principles. Forensic Sci. Int., 332, 111182.
Roux, C.; Ribaux, O. & Crispino, F. (2018). Forensic science 2020 – the end of the crossroads? Aust. J. Forensic Sci., 50(6), 607-618.
Saferstein, R. (2010). Criminalistics: an introduction to forensic science. (10a ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall,
San Pietro, D.; Kammrath, B. W. & De Forest P R. (2019). Is forensic science in danger of extinction? Sci. Justice., 59(2), 199-202.
Sosa, J. M. (2003). Criminalística Tomo I. Mexico: Editorial Limusa, Noriega Editores.
Strätz, M. (2021). A autoridade científica da prova pericial na persecução penal: o laudo convence porque tem autoridade, ou só tem autoridade porque convence? De Legibus, 2, 153-171.
Stumvoll, V. P. (org). Criminalística. (2019). (7a ed.). Ed. Millennium397p.
Tocchetto, D. & Espindula A. (2016). Criminalística: Procedimentos e Metodologias. (3a ed.). Ed. Millennium523p.
Velho, J. A.; Geiser, G. C. & Espindula, A. (2018). Capítulo I: Introdução às ciências forenses. In: Ciências forenses - uma introdução às principais áreas da criminalística moderna. (3a ed.). Editora Millennium, 528p.
Weyermann, C. & Roux, C. (2021). A different perspective on the forensic science crisis. Forensic Sci Int., 323, 110779.
Weyermann, C.; Willis, S.; Margot, P. & Roux, C. (2023). Towards more relevance in forensic science research and development. Forensic Sci. Int., 348, 111592.
Willis, S. (2023). The profissionalism of forensic science. WIREs Forensic Sci., 5, e1478.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Alexandre Giovanelli
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
