Use of the modified progenic apparatus in the previous cross-bite interception

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i8.5110

Keywords:

Interceptive orthodontics; Malocclusion; Mixed Dentition.

Abstract

An interceptive orthodontia allows the correction of the anterior crossbite early, in order to promote or harmonious growth of the osseous bases. There are alternatives for the treatment of the cross bite prior to the use of the removed devices as a modified progeny. The objective of this work is to carry out or the report of a clinical case of anterior crossbite treated with this approach. Patient with nine years of age, feminine sex and in the phase of dentição mista. No clinical examination observed a diminution of the zygomatic projection and maxillary deficiency. A cephalometric analysis verified a negative maxillo-mandibular relationship, due to the tendency of vertical growth and lower incisors to be positioned. After making the dress, you are ready to install and stay after seven days, using a protocol for maintenance once a week for three weeks. Or the modified progeny has been shown to be effective without treatment of the anterior crossbite in a three-week period, enabling or derailing the maxilla for a more harmonious growth of bone bases. Or use of the fast and effective modified progeny device without dentoalveolar anterior crossbite interceptor treatment. It will be necessary to preserve the case, supervising or developing the occlusion and growth of the bone bases.

References

Graber, T. M.(1996). Orthodontics Principles and Practice. 2 ed. Philadelphia : Saunders, p. 551-58.

Martinez, J. A., Mota, L. F. G., Miranda, I. M. A. D., & GuedesPinto, A. C. (1998). Cirurgia em odontopediatria. In: Guedes-Pinto AC. Odontopediatria clínica. São Paulo: Artes Médicas. cap.12, p.16790. Jirgensone, I., Liepa, A., & Abeltins, A.(2008). Anterior crossbite correction in primary and mixed dentition with removable inclined plane (Bruckl appliance). Stomatologija. 10(4):1404.

Karaiskos, N., Wiltshire, W. A., Odlum, O., Brothwell, D., & Hassard, T. H.. (2005). Preventive and interceptive orthodontic treatment needs of an inner-city group of 6- and 9year-old Canadian children. J CanDent Assoc.; 71(9):649.

Miamoto, C. B., Marques, L. S., Abreu, L. G., & Paiva, S. M. (2018). "Impact of two early treatment protocols for anterior dental crossbite on children’s quality of life." Dental pressjournaloforthodontics 23.1: 71-78.

Schopf, P. (2003 May). Indication for and frequency of early orthodontic therapy or interceptive measures. J OrofacOrthop.;64(3):186-200.

Shanker, S., Ngan, P., Wade, D., Beck, M., Yiu, C., Hägg, U., & Wei, S. H. (1996). CephalometricA point changes during and after maxillary protraction and expansion. Am J OrthodDentofacialOrthop.110(4):423-30.

Souza, L. F. M. (2017). Tratamento da mordida cruzada anterior com o arco progênico modificado: um enfoque clínico [Trabalho de conclusão de curso]. Manaus (AM).

Tavares, P. C. F. (2016). Tratamento ortodôntico interceptativo da mordida cruzada anterior e posterior: relato de caso clínico [Trabalho de conclusão de curso]. Fortaleza (CE).

Terada, H. H., Suguino, R., Ramos, A. L., Furquim, L. Z., Maeda, L., Silva Filho, O. G. D.(1997). Utilização do aparelho progênico para correção das mordidas cruzadas anteriores. Rev Dental Press Ortod Ortop Facial 2.2: 86-94.

Tocci, L. F. C., Filho, O. G. S., Fuziy, A., & Lauris, J. R. P. (2013). Influence of intentional ankylosis of deciduous canines to reinforce the anchorage for maxillary protraction. Dental press journal of orthodontics 18.1: 94-102.

Published

25/06/2020

How to Cite

MOURA, R. A.; SIMPLÍCIO, A. H. de M.; LAU, M. de J. C. C.; AMORIM, A. N.; SILVA, F. A. de J. C.; MELO NETO, M. V. de. Use of the modified progenic apparatus in the previous cross-bite interception. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 8, p. e98985110, 2020. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v9i8.5110. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5110. Acesso em: 2 nov. 2024.

Issue

Section

Health Sciences