Evaluation of acceptability of the use of internal and external condoms in couples: a cross-over study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i9.7942

Keywords:

Condoms; Functional acceptability; Sexual behavior; Sexual health; Cross-over studies.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the acceptability (comfort, ease of use, lubrication, and pleasure) of internal and external condom use in stable couples. Metodology: This randomized cross-over trial included 54 couples (108 adult individuals). Participants were asked to evaluate acceptability measures of both types of condoms using the Visual Analogue Scale.  We developed a three-level hierarchical model [level 1= three repeated measures (wave, type of condom); level 2= individual (gender, age); level 3= couple (sequence of presentation of female versus external condom)]. Results: The "ease of use" dimension represented the biggest difference between the types of condoms for men (Hedges 'g = 0.96; p <0.0001) and women (Hedges' g = 1.62; p <0.0001). Regardless of gender, external condoms performed better (1.61; 95% HPD = 1.41 – 1.81). Men gave lower scores in general (-0.62; 95% HPD = -1.16 − -0.10). Conclusion: The external condom scored better than the internal condom for women and their male partners. The scores tended to improve with the repetitive use of the condom. There is no evidence of the influence of the age of the individuals or the randomly selected sequence of use of condoms with regards to the mean score of the four dimensions.

References

Alferes, V. R. (1999). Escala de Atitudes Sexuais. In M. R. Simões, M. M. Gonçalves, & L. A. Almeida (Eds.), Testes e provas psicológicas em Portugal (pp. 131-142). Braga: SHO APPORT.

Asante, K. O., & Doku, P. N. (2010). Cultural adaptation of the condom use self efficacy scale (CUSES) in Ghana. BMC Public Health, 10(1), 227. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-227

Beksinska, M. E., Piaggio, G., Smit, J. A., Wu, J., Zhang, Y., Pienaar, J., et al. (2013). Performance and safety of the second-generation female condom (FC2) versus the Woman's, the VA worn-of-women, and the Cupid female condoms: a randomised controlled non-inferiority crossover trial. The Lancet Global Health, 1(3), e146-e152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70054-8

Beksinska, M., Greener, R., Kleinschmidt, I., Pillay, L., Maphumulo, V., & Smit, J. (2015). A randomized noninferiority crossover controlled trial of the functional performance and safety of new female condoms: an evaluation of the Velvet, Cupid2, and FC2. Contraception, 92(3), 261-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2015.05.008

Beksinska, M., Smit, J., Joanis, C., & Potter, W. (2012). New female condoms in the pipeline. Reproductive health matters, 20(40), 188-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(12)40659-0

Bojko, M. J., Schensul, S. L., Singh, R., Burleson, J. A., Moonzwe, L. S., & Saggurti, N. (2010).

Sexual health, marital sex, and sexual risk in urban poor communities in India. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 22(3_suppl), 144S-150S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539510373126

Bowling, J., Dodge, B., Bindra, N., Dave, B., Sharma, R., Sundarraman, V., et al. (2018). Female condom acceptability in urban India: Examining the role of sexual pleasure. Journal of health psychology, 23(2), 218-228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105317745963

Brafford, L. J., & Beck, K. H. (1991). Development and validation of a condom self-efficacy scale for college students. Journal of American College Health, 39(5), 219-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.1991.9936238

Brazilian Association of Companies and Research. (2018). Economic Classification Criteria Brazil. Available at: http://www.abep.org/criterioBr/01_cceb_2018.pdf. Accessed February 20, 2019.

Brown, I. S. (1984). Development of a scale to measure attitude toward the condom as a method of birth control. Journal of Sex Research, 20(3), 255-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498409551224

Chen, B. A., Blithe, D. L., Muraguri, G. R., Lance, A. A., Carr, B. R., Jensen, J. T., et al. (2019). Acceptability of the Woman's Condom in a phase III multicenter open-label study. Contraception, 99(6), 357-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2019.02.006

Choudhry, V., Agardh, A., Stafström, M., & Östergren, P. O. (2014). Patterns of alcohol consumption and risky sexual behavior: a cross-sectional study among Ugandan university students. BMC public health, 14(1), 128.

Closson, K., Dietrich, J. J., Lachowsky, N. J., Nkala, B., Palmer, A., Cui, Z., et al. (2018). Gender, sexual self-efficacy and consistent condom use among adolescents living in the HIV hyper-endemic setting of Soweto, South Africa. AIDS and Behavior, 22(2), 671-680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1950-z

Downs, J. S., Ashcraft, A. M., Murray, P. J., Berlan, E. D., de Bruin, W. B., Eichner, J., et al. (2018). Video intervention to increase perceived self-efficacy for condom use in a randomized controlled trial of female adolescents. Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology, 31(3), 291-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2017.10.008

Friedman, L. M., Furberg, C. D., DeMets, D. L., Reboussin, D. M., & Granger, C. B. (2015). Fundamentals of clinical trials. Springer.

Fonner, V. A., Kennedy, C. E., O’Reilly, K. R., & Sweat, M. D. (2014). Systematic assessment of condom use measurement in evaluation of HIV prevention interventions: need for standardization of measures. AIDS and Behavior, 18(12), 2374-2386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-013-0655-1

Hollub, A. V., Reece, M., Herbenick, D., Hensel, D. J., & Middlestadt, S. E. (2011). College students and condom attitude: validation of the Multi-Factor Attitude toward Condoms Scale (MFACS). Journal of American College Health, 59(8), 708-714. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2010.546462

Jones, J., Tiwari, A., Salazar, L. F., & Crosby, R. A. (2018). Predicting condom use outcomes via the information motivation behavioral skills model: an analysis of young black men. International Journal of Sexual Health, 30(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2017.1385560

Kalichman, S. C., & Rompa, D. (1995). Sexual sensation seeking and sexual compulsivity scales: Validity, and predicting HIV risk behavior. Journal of personality assessment, 65(3), 586-601. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6503_16

Kulczycki, A., Kim, D. J., Duerr, A., Jamieson, D. J., & Macaluso, M. (2004). The acceptability of the female and male condom: a randomized crossover trial. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 36(3), 114-119. https://doi.org/10.1363/3611404

Louw, J., Peltzer, K., & Chirinda, W. (2012). Correlates of HIV risk reduction self-efficacy among youth in South Africa. The Scientific World Journal, 2012(817315), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/817315

Maksut, J. L., & Eaton, L. A. (2015). Female condoms= missed opportunities: Lessons learned from promotion-centered interventions. Women's Health Issues, 25(4), 366-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2015.03.015

Peixoto, C., Botelho, F., Tomada, I., & Tomada, N. (2016). Comportamento sexual de estudantes de medicina portugueses e seus fatores preditivos. Revista Internacional de Andrología, 14(2), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.androl.2015.02.001

Reece, M., Herbenick, D., & Dodge, B. (2009). Penile dimensions and men’s perceptions of condom fit and feel. Sexually transmitted infections, 85(2), 127-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sti.2008.033050

Sacco, W. P., Levine, B., Reed, D. L., & Thompson, K. (1991). Attitudes about condom use as an AIDS-relevant behavior: their factor structure and relation to condom use. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3(2), 265. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.3.2.265

Sanders, S. A., Hill, B. J., Crosby, R. A., & Janssen, E. (2014). Correlates of condom-associated erection problems in young, heterosexual men: Condom fit, self-efficacy, perceptions, and motivations. AIDS and Behavior, 18(1), 128-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-013-0422-3

Santos-Iglesias, P., Moyano, N., Castro, A., Granados, M. R., & Sierra, J. C. (2018). Validation of the sexual sensation seeking scale in Spanish samples. Journal of personality assessment, 100(4), 421-430. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1328424

Shen, Q., Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Wang, Y., Luo, M., Wang, S., et al. (2019). Understanding condom use among unmarried female migrants: a psychological and personality factors modified information-motivation-behavioral skills model. BMC public health, 19(1), 223. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6541-7

Siegler, A. J., Rosenthal, E. M., Sullivan, P. S., Ahlschlager, L., Kelley, C. F., Mehta, C. C., et al.. (2019). Double-Blind, Single-Center, Randomized Three-Way Crossover Trial of Fitted, Thin, and Standard Condoms for Vaginal and Anal Sex: C-PLEASURE Study Protocol and Baseline Data. JMIR research protocols, 8(4), e12205. https://doi.org/10.2196/12205

Sousa, C. S. P. D., Castro, R. C. M. B., Pinheiro, A. K. B., Moura, E. R. F., Almeida, P. C., & Aquino, P. D. S. (2017). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Condom Self-Efficacy Scale: application to Brazilian adolescents and young adults. Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 25, e2991. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.1062.2991

Stone, N., Graham, C., Anstee, S., Brown, K., Newby, K., & Ingham, R. (2018). Enhancing condom use experiences among young men to improve correct and consistent condom use: feasibility of a home-based intervention strategy (HIS-UK). Pilot and feasibility studies, 4(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-018-0257-9

Ting, C. Y., Ting, R. S. K., Lim, C. J., King, T. L., Ting, H., & Gerofi, J. (2019). Pilot study on functional performance and acceptability of two new synthetic adhesive male condoms (Wondaleaf): a randomized cross-over trial. Contraception, 100(1), 65-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2019.02.013

Ting, R. S. K., Wong, E. L., & Tnay, J. K. S. (2018). A pilot study on the functional performance and acceptability of an innovative female condom (Wondaleaf®) in Malaysia. Open access journal of contraception, 9, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJC.S152505

Wang, X., Xi, M., Zhang, L., Jia, L., Wang, Y., & Cheng, Y. (2015). Awareness of female condoms and failures reported with two different types in China. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 128(2), 152-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.08.017

Wanyenze, R. K., Atuyambe, L., Kibirige, V., Mbabazi, S., Tumwesigye, N. M., Djurhuus, K., & Namale, A. (2011). The new female condom (FC2) in Uganda: perceptions and experiences of users and their sexual partners. African Journal of AIDS Research, 10(3), 219-224. https://doi.org/10.2989/16085906.2011.626289

Downloads

Published

10/09/2020

How to Cite

Afonso, T. M. ., Passos, T. S. ., & Almeida-Santos, M. A. (2020). Evaluation of acceptability of the use of internal and external condoms in couples: a cross-over study. Research, Society and Development, 9(9), e846997942. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i9.7942

Issue

Section

Health Sciences