Tutor preference and perception for the type of pet animal transportation on commercial flights

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i1.11353

Keywords:

Animal Welfare; Air transport; Pets.

Abstract

Pets have been increasingly integrated into family activities. In view of this tendency, the objective of this study was to assess the preference of tutors for the air transport conditions offered in a commercial situation to their animals (cabin or cargo hold). Tutors' concerns about animal welfare, their insecurity in relation to the air transport services and the importance given to airport infrastructure were also assessed. Data were collected for eight months, by applying two questionnaires. For the first questionnaire, 80 tutors were selected, carrying at least one dog or cat, in both national and international flights. The second questionnaire was applied to 157 individuals who owned at least one pet and intended to board it along on commercial flights, whereas hedonic scales composed response options for each factor. 58% of tutors chose to board their pets in the passenger cabin and 42% in the aircraft cargo hold. Most of the factors related to animal welfare during the flight were considered "extremely worrying". Tutors were "extremely insecure" when hiring air services and considered the factors related to the infrastructure of the airports "very important" for their animals. The “extreme concern” with the mistreatment of animals (74.4%), the “extreme insecurity” with the possibility of extraviation of the animals (76.0%) and the “great importance” given to guarantees of animal welfare and safety at the airports (91.1%) were very relevant in this research. Therefore, it is concluded that tutors prefer to transport their pets in the cabin, as a way to guarantee animal welfare during the flight.

References

Alliance Consulting and Management. (2001). Influence of pre-delivery management of livestock performance: desk top study (LIVE.104A). North Sydney, Australia: Meat and Livestock.

Australian Government. (2020). Australian standards for the export of livestock 3.0. Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment. Australian Government: Canberra, Australia.

Bergeron, R., Scott, S. L., Emond, J. P., Mercier, F., Cook, N. J., & Schaefer, A. L. (2002). Physiology and behavior of dogs during air transport. Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire, 66(3), 211-216.

Bland, A. (2013). Is taking your pet on an airplane worth the risk. Recuperado de https://www.smithsonianmag.com/travel/is-taking-your-pet-on-an-airplane-worth-the-risk-6241533/

Collins, T., Stockman, C., Hampton, J. O., & Barnes, A. (2020). Identifying animal welfare impacts of livestock air transport. Australian Veterinary Journal, 98(5), 197-199.

Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil, de 05 de outubro de 1988. (1988). Brasília, DF. Recuperado de http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm

Coren, S. (2012). Is it safe to ship dogs or cats by air? Recuperado de https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/canine-corner/201209/is-it-safe-ship-dogs-or-cats-air?

Escobar-Aguirre, S., Alegría-Morán, R. A., Calderón-Amor, J., & Tadich, T. A. (2019). Can Responsible Ownership Practices Influence Hunting Behavior of Owned Cats?: Results from a Survey of Cat Owners in Chile. Animals, 9(10), 745.

Fleming, P. A., Wickham, S. L., Dunston-Clarke, E. J., Willis, R. S., Barnes, A. L., Miller, D. W., & Collins, T. (2020). Review of Livestock Welfare Indicators Relevant for the Australian Live Export Industry. Animals, 10(7), 1236.

Hogan, L., & Willis, G. (2009). Best practice design of crates for livestock export by air. North Sydney, Australia: Meat and Livestock Australia.

Lei n. 8.078, de 11 de setembro de 1990. (1990). Dispõe sobre a proteção do consumidor e dá outras providências. Brasília, DF. Recuperado de http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l8078compilado.htm

Lei Federal n. 9.605, de 12 de fevereiro de 1998. (1998). Dispõe sobre as sanções penais e administrativas derivadas de condutas e atividades lesivas ao meio ambiente, e dá outras providências. Brasília, DF. Recuperado de http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l9605.htm

Menchetti, L., Calipari, S., Mariti, C., Gazzano, A., & Diverio, S. (2020) Cats and dogs: Best friends or deadly enemies? What the owners of cats and dogs living in the same household think about their relationship with people and other pets. PLoS ONE, 15(8), e0237822.

Miguel, P. A. C., Fleury, A., Mello, C. H. P., Nakano, D. N., Turrioni, J. B., Ho, L. L.; ... Pureza, V. (2010). Metodologia de pesquisa em engenharia de produção e gestão de operações. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.

Otarola, G. N. (2018). Behavioral and physiological responses of livestock to simulated and actual transport by sea (Tese de Doutorado). University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Paolini, A., Romagnoli, S., Nardoia, M., Conte, A., Salini, R., Podaliri Vulpiani, M., & Dalla Villa, P. (2020). Study on the Public Perception of "Community-Owned Dogs" in the Abruzzo Region, Central Italy. Animals, 10(7), 1227.

Projeto de Lei da Câmara n. 27, de 2018. (2018). Acrescenta dispositivo à Lei nº 9.605, de 12 de fevereiro de 1998, para dispor sobre a natureza jurídica dos animais não humanos. Brasília, DF. Recuperado de https://www25.senado.leg.br/web/atividade/materias/-/materia/133167/pdf

SAS. (2012). Statistical Analysis System user’s guide. SAS Institute. Version 9.2, Cary.

Silva, P. H, Moura, W. S., Oliveira, Y. R, Abreu, M. C., Silva, E. L., Ferreira, P. M. P., & Pacheco, A. C. L. (2020). Level of knowledge of biology students from universidade federal do piauí on the welfare of small domestic animals (dogs and cats). Research, Society and Development, 9(7): 1-18, e324974192.

Souza, J. S., & Paoli, L. (2019). Transporte de animais de estimação. Será que estamos no caminho certo? Recuperado de https://www.petfriendlyturismo.com.br/2019/08/16/transporte-de-animais-de-estimacao-sera-que-estamos-no-caminho-certo/

Venable, E. B, Bland, S. D, Holscher, H. D, & Swanson, K. S. (2016). Effects of air travel stress on the canine microbiome: a pilot study. International Journal of Veterinary Health Science & Research, 4, 132-139.

Published

03/01/2021

How to Cite

DUTRA, D. R.; SOUZA, J. S. de; VILLEGAS-CAYLLAHUA, E. A. .; MELLO , J. L. M. de; BORBA, H. Tutor preference and perception for the type of pet animal transportation on commercial flights. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 1, p. e7610111353, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i1.11353. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11353. Acesso em: 16 jan. 2021.

Issue

Section

Agrarian and Biological Sciences