Study of cesarean section indications in a low-risk referral maternity hospital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i1.11375Keywords:
Cesarean section; Obstetrics; Women's health.Abstract
Objective: To analyze whether the indications for cesarean section performed in a low risk reference maternity in Sergipe are in accordance with the Ministry of Health guideline published in 2016. Methods: Documentary, prospective, qualitative, descriptive and cross-sectional study, with data collection through analysis of 318 post-cesarean section medical records from 2018 to 2019. The data obtained were analyzed using descriptive statistics with the aid of the Graph Pad Prism and SPSS 20 software. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee. Results: The main indication found was a previous cesarean section, followed by others such as: cephalopelvic disproportion, breech presentation, iterativity, fetal distress, macrosomia, induction failure and post-datism. Conclusion: According to the main indication found, the indications are not fully in accordance with the guideline. However, other indications found are correct, but are outside the guideline because they are situations of intra-delivery care and urgency, not discussed in the document.
References
Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar. (2016). Cartilha nova organização do cuidado ao parto e nascimento para melhores resultados de saúde: Projeto Parto Adequado-fase 1.
Amorim, M. M. R., Souza, A. S. R., & Porto, A. M. F. (2010). Indicações de cesariana baseadas em evidências: parte I. Femina.
Barrett, J. F., Hannah, M. E., Hutton, E. K., Willan, A. R., Allen, A. C., Armson, B. A., ... & Ross, S. (2013). A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. New England Journal of Medicine, 369(14), 1295-1305.
Cahill, A., Tuuli, M., Odibo, A. O., Stamilio, D. M., & Macones, G. A. (2010). Vaginal birth after caesarean for women with three or more prior caesareans: assessing safety and success. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 117(4), 422-428.
Calvert, C., & Ronsmans, C. (2013). HIV and the risk of direct obstetric complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one, 8(10), e74848.
Carlo, W. A., & Travers, C. P. (2016). Maternal and neonatal mortality: time to act. Jornal de pediatria, 92(6), 543-545.
Dekker, G. A., Chan, A., Luke, C. G., Priest, K., Riley, M., Halliday, J., ... & Cull, V. (2010). Risk of uterine rupture in Australian women attempting vaginal birth after one prior caesarean section: a retrospective population‐based cohort study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 117(11), 1358-1365.
Guise, J. M., Denman, M. A., Emeis, C., Marshall, N., Walker, M., Fu, R., ... & McDonagh, M. (2010). Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 115(6), 1267-1278.
Haumonté, J. B., Raylet, M., Sabiani, L., Franké, O., Bretelle, F., Boubli, L., & d’Ercole, C. (2012). Quels facteurs influencent la voie d’accouchement en cas de tentative de voie basse sur utérus cicatriciel?. Journal de gynécologie obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction, 41(8), 735-752.
Homer, C. S. E., Kurinczuk, J. J., Spark, P., Brocklehurst, P., & Knight, M. (2011). Planned vaginal delivery or planned caesarean delivery in women with extreme obesity. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 118(4), 480-487.
Kayem, G., Raiffort, C., Legardeur, H., Gavard, L., Mandelbrot, L., & Girard, G. (2012). Critères d’acceptation de la voie vaginale selon les caractéristiques de la cicatrice utérine. Journal de gynécologie obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction, 41(8), 753-771.
Lansky, S., Friche, A. A. D. L., Silva, A. A. M. D., Campos, D., Bittencourt, S. D. D. A., Carvalho, M. L. D., ... & Cunha, A. J. L. A. D. (2014). Pesquisa Nascer no Brasil: perfil da mortalidade neonatal e avaliação da assistência à gestante e ao recém-nascido. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 30, S192-S207.
London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK). (2019). Caesarean section. (NICE Clinical Guidelines, No. 132.) Recuperado de: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK552671/. Acesso em: 18/11/2020.
London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK). (2017). Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies. (NICE Clinical Guidelines, No. 190.) Recuperado de: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190/resources/intrapartum-care-for-healthy-women-and-babies-pdf-35109866447557. Acesso em: 18/11/2020.
Ministério da Saúde, Brasil. (2012). Atenção ao pré-natal de baixo risco. Recuperado de: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/atencao_pre_natal_baixo_risco.pdf. Acesso em: 18/11/2020.
Ministério da Saúde, Brasil. (2016). Portaria No306, de 28 de março de 2016: Diretrizes de Atenção à Gestante: a operação cesariana.
Montenegro, C. B., & de Rezende Filho, J. F. (2014). Obstetrícia fundamental. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan.
Novo, J. L. V. G., Pellicciari, C. R., de Arruda Camargo, L., Bálsamo, S. B., & Novo, N. F. (2017). Indicações de partos cesáreos em hospitais de atendimento ao Sistema Único de Saúde: baixo e alto riscos. Revista da Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Sorocaba, 19(2), 67-71.
O'Dwyer, V., Hogan, J. L., Farah, N., Kennelly, M. M., Fitzpatrick, C., & Turner, M. J. (2012). Maternal mortality and the rising cesarean rate. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 116(2), 162-164.
Oliveira, R. R. D., Melo, E. C., Novaes, E. S., Ferracioli, P. L. R. V., & Mathias, T. A. D. F. (2016). Factors associated to caesarean delivery in public and private health care systems. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 50(5), 733-740.
Pádua, K. S. D., Osis, M. J. D., Faúndes, A., Barbosa, A. H., & Moraes Filho, O. B. (2010). Fatores associados à realização de cesariana em hospitais brasileiros. Revista de Saúde Pública, 44, 70-79.
Pereira A.S. et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. [e-book]. Santa Maria. Ed. UAB/NTE/UFSM. Recuperado de: https://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/handle/1/15824/Lic_Computacao_Metodologia-Pesquisa-Cientifica.pdf?sequence=1. Accesso: 28/12/2020.
Ribeiro, L. B. (2016). Nascer em Belo Horizonte: cesarianas desnecessárias e prematuridade. Dissertação (Mestrado em Enfermagem) - Escola de Enfermagem da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte.
Sampaio, Z. S., Alencar Júnior, C. A., Feitosa, F. E. D. L., & Amorim, M. M. R. D. (2004). Fatores associados ao parto vaginal em gestantes de alto risco submetidas à indução do parto com misoprostol. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, 26(1), 21-29.
Souza, A. S. R., Costa, A. A. R., Coutinho, I., Noronha Neto, C., & Amorim, M. M. R. (2010). Indução do trabalho de parto: conceitos e particularidades. Femina.
Tahseen, S., & Griffiths, M. (2010). Vaginal birth after two caesarean sections (VBAC‐2)—a systematic review with meta‐analysis of success rate and adverse outcomes of VBAC‐2 versus VBAC‐1 and repeat (third) caesarean sections. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 117(1), 5-19.
Weidle, W. G., Medeiros, C. R. G., Grave, M. T. Q., & Dal Bosco, S. M. (2014). Escolha da via de parto pela mulher: autonomia ou indução?. Cadernos Saúde Coletiva, 22(1), 46-53.
World Health Organization. (2015). WHO Statement on caesarean section rates. Reproductive health matters, 23(45), 149–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhm.2015.07.007
Xie, R. H., Gaudet, L., Krewski, D., Graham, I. D., Walker, M. C., & Wen, S. W. (2015). Higher cesarean delivery rates are associated with higher infant mortality rates in industrialized countries. Birth, 42(1), 62-69.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Maria Nathália Prado Simões Mendonça; Marina de Pádua Nogueira Menezes; Marina Santos Costa Lima; Marcel Vieira Gomes; Mariana Moscoso Rêgo de Matos; Felipe Cerqueira Lima
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
