The use and inter-relationship of compound resin and glass ionomer cement (GIC) in sandwich restorations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i6.15617Keywords:
Glass ionomer cements; Composite resins; Permanent dental restoration.Abstract
Introduction: The sandwich technique is a procedure that combines the glass ionomer cement (GIC) with the composite resin (CR) in order to obtain the best physical-mechanical and aesthetic properties of each one. Objective: perform a literary review on the use of this method in direct restorations and analyze how the interaction between the two materials occurs. Methods: A search of the literature published between 2010 and 2021 was carried out in the databases PubMed/ Medline, SciELO, Lilacs and Google Scholar, using pre-selected descriptors. 40 studies were included that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: The association of GIC with CR brings to the direct restoration the benefits of pulp protection, anti-cariogenic effect, less polymerization contraction, greater retention and better aesthetic properties. This method can be classified as open, closed, mediate and immediate, these variations will depend, respectively, on the indication and the form of preparation of the procedure. Conclusion: When carrying out the acid conditioning of the surface of the conventional GIC, it is necessary to be cautious, since the differences in the setting reactions of this material and the CR can interfere with the final properties of the restoration. However, resin-modified glass ionomer cement does not require this procedure. Although some scholars do not suggest this type of pre-treatment, due to the possibility of promoting cracks and decreasing its strength, research claims that the mixed technique can be performed effectively when using both conventional and self-etching adhesive systems, as no were observed significant differences bond strength when comparing them.
References
Anusavice, K. J. (2013). Phillips materiais dentários. 12° edição, Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier Brasil.
Avila, W. M., Hesse, D., & Bonifacio, C. C. (2019). Surface Conditioning Prior to the Application of Glass-Ionomer Cement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. The journal of adhesive dentistry, 21(5), 391–399. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a43183
Bayrak, S., Sen, T. E., & Tuloglu, N. (2012). The effects of surface pretreatment on the microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement restorations. The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 36(3), 279–284.
Becci, A. C. D. O., Benetti, M. D. S., Domingues, N. B., & Giro, E. M. A. (2017). Bond strength of a composite resin to glass ionomer cements using different adhesive systems. Revista de Odontologia da UNESP, 46(4), 214-219.
Bin-Shuwaish M. S. (2020). Shear Bond Strength of Bulk-Fill Composites to Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Evaluated by Different Adhesion Protocols. Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry, 12, 367–375.
Boaventura, J. M. C., Roberto, A. R., de Oliveira Becci, A. C., Ribeiro, B. C. I., de Oliveira, M. R. B., & de Andrade, M. F. (2017). Importância da biocompatibilidade de novos materiais: revisão para o cimento de ionômero de vidro. Revista de Odontologia da Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, 24(1), 42-50.
Bragança, S. G. (2013). Avaliação do grau de conversão de resinas compostas de alto e médio escoamento em restaurações classe II.
Carvalho, L. M. N. P. D. (2013). Estudo da influência da radiação ionizante na tração diametral de cimentos de ionômero de vidro (Master's thesis, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul).
Catelan, A., Soares, G. P., Martins, L. R. M., & Aguiar, F. H. B. (2010). Longevidade clínica de restaurações classe II em resina composta: Influência de materiais e técnicas. Rev Odontol Araçatuba, 31(1), 60-5.
Fernandes, H. K., Silva, R., Marinho, M. A. S., de Souza OLIVEIRA, P. O., Ribeiro, J. C. R., & MOYSES, M. R. (2014). Evolução da resina composta: revisão da literatura. Revista da universidade vale do rio verde, 12(2), 401-411.
Francois, P., Vennat, E., Le Goff, S., Ruscassier, N., Attal, J. P., & Dursun, E. (2019). Shear bond strength and interface analysis between a resin composite and a recent high-viscous glass ionomer cement bonded with various adhesive systems. Clinical oral investigations, 23(6), 2599–2608.
Ghubaryi, A., Ingle, N., & Basser, M. A. (2020). Surface treatment of RMGIC to composite resin using different photosensitizers and lasers: A bond assessment of closed Sandwich restoration. Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy, 32, 101965.
Jaberi Ansari, Z., Panahandeh, N., Tabatabaei Shafiei, Z. S., & Akbarzadeh Baghban, A. (2014). Effect of Self-etching Adhesives on the Bond Strength of Glass-Ionomer Cements. Journal of dentistry (Tehran, Iran), 11(6), 680–686.
Kasraie, S., Shokripour, M., & Safari, M. (2013). Evaluation of micro-shear bond strength of resin modified glass-ionomer to composite resins using various bonding systems. Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD, 16(6), 550–554.
Kirsten, G. A., Rached, R. N., Mazur, R. F., Vieira, S., & Souza, E. M. (2013). Effect of open-sandwich vs. adhesive restorative techniques on enamel and dentine demineralization: an in situ study. Journal of dentistry, 41(10), 872–880.
Lugassy, D., Segal, P., Blumer, S., Eger, M., Shely, A., & Matalon, S. (2018). Effect of Two Traditional Polyacrylic Acid Conditioners and 2% Chlorhexidine Digluconate on Cavosurface Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Restorations. The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 42(4), 287–291.
Mazaheri, R., Pishevar, L., Shichani, A. V., & Geravandi, S. (2015). Effect of different cavity conditioners on microleakage of glass ionomer cement with a high viscosity in primary teeth. Dental research journal, 12(4), 337–341.
Navimipour, E. J., Oskoee, S. S., Oskoee, P. A., Bahari, M., Rikhtegaran, S., & Ghojazadeh, M. (2012). Effect of acid and laser etching on shear bond strength of conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements to composite resin. Lasers in medical science, 27(2), 305–311.
Ngo, H., & Opsahl-Vital, S. (2014). Minimal intervention dentistry II: part 7. Minimal intervention in cariology: the role of glass-ionomer cements in the preservation of tooth structures against caries. British dental journal, 216(10), 561–565.
Nguyen, K. V., Sathorn, C., Wong, R. H., & Burrow, M. F. (2015). Clinical performance of laminate and non-laminate resin composite restorations: a systematic review. Australian dental journal, 60(4), 520–527.
Pamir, T., Sen, B. H., & Evcin, O. (2012). Effects of etching and adhesive applications on the bond strength between composite resin and glass-ionomer cements. Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB, 20(6), 636–642.
Pandey, S. A., Lokhande, M. T., Gulve, M. N., Kolhe, S. J., & Aher, G. B. (2019). Shear bond strength of composite resin to resin-modified glass ionomer cement using 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-based and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-free adhesive system. Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD, 22(3), 292–295.
Paula, A. M. (2018). As restaurações em lesões cervicais não cariosas pela “técnica sanduíche” apresentam taxas de retenção superiores à técnica restauradora com resina composta? Uma revisão sistemática e meta-análise.
Pelozo, G. B. (2013). Influência do tempo de condicionamento ácido na resistência de união, resistência à compressão e rugosidade superficial do ionômero de vidro.
Poggio, C., Beltrami, R., Scribante, A., Colombo, M., & Lombardini, M. (2014). Effects of dentin surface treatments on shear bond strength of glass-ionomer cements. Annali di stomatologia, 5(1), 15–22.
Queiroz, V. A. O. (2012). Análise de sequência alternativa para restauração laminada: cimento de ionômero de vidro e resina composta.
Ramos, A. B. (2016). Adesão de resina composta a cimento de ionômero de vidro submetido a diferentes tratamentos de superfície.
Ramos, A. B., Moro, A., Rocha, G. M., & Reis Perez, C. D. (2018). Micro-shear bond strength of composite resin to glass ionomer cement using an alternative method to build up test specimens. Indian journal of dental research : official publication of Indian Society for Dental Research, 29(5), 651–656.
Shafiei, F., & Akbarian, S. (2014). Microleakage of nanofilled resin-modified glass-ionomer/silorane- or methacrylate-based composite sandwich Class II restoration: effect of simultaneous bonding. Operative dentistry, 39(1), E22–E30.
Sharafeddin, F., & Choobineh, M. M. (2016). Assessment of the Shear Bond Strength between Nanofilled Composite Bonded to Glass-ionomer Cement Using Self-etch Adhesive with Different pHs and Total-Etch Adhesive. Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran), 17(1), 1–6.
Silva, A. F., & RG, L. (2016). Dentística restauradora: Do planejamento à execução. Rio de Janeiro: Santos.
Silva, F. W. G. D. P., Queiroz, A. M. D., Freitas, A. C. D., & Assed, S. (2011). Glass Ionomer cemnent in pediatric desistry. Odontologia Clínico-Científica (Online), 10(1), 13-17.
Silva, S. B. (2011). Resistência à fadiga e propensão a trincas em restaurações amplas de resina composta em dentes posteriores.
Soubhagya, M., Goud, K. M., Deepak, B. S., Thakur, S., Nandini, T. N., & Arun, J. (2015). Comparative in vitro evaluation of internal adaptation of resin-modified glass ionomer, flowable composite and bonding agent applied as a liner under composite restoration: A scanning electron microscope study. Journal of international oral health : JIOH, 7(4), 27–31.
Tumenas, I., Pascottos, R., Saade, J. L., & Bassani, M. (2014). Odontologia minimamente invasiva. Revista da Associacao Paulista de Cirurgioes Dentistas, 68(4), 283-295.
Unnikrishnan, S., Krishnamurthy, N. H., & Nagarathna, C. (2019). Marginal microleakage of glass ionomer cement with two different cavity conditioners on primary anterior teeth - An in vitro study. Indian journal of dental research : official publication of Indian Society for Dental Research, 30(2), 267–272.
Vincenti, S. A. D. F. (2018). Caracterização e resistência adesiva de cimentos de ionômero de vidro modificados por resina incorporados com vitrocerâmica bioativa (Doctoral dissertation, Universidade de São Paulo).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Francielly de Lemos Medeiros; Brenno Anderson Santiago Dias; Geovanna Caroline Brito da Silva; Jefferson Lucas Mendes; Layla Narrely Santos Alves; Marcelo Gadelha Vasconcelos; Rodrigo Gadelha Vasconcelos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
