Growth of Bidens pilosa and bean submitted to different concentrations of CO2 and competitive arrangements
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i7.16651Keywords:
Phaseolus vulgaris; Competitiveness; Photosynthesis.Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the increase in the level of CO2 in the environment on the growth of black pepper and common bean plants under competitive conditions. For this, an experiment was conducted in DIC with four repetitions. The effect of the black prick was evaluated in a 3 x 4 factorial scheme, with three concentrations of CO2 in the growth chambers (420; 840 and 1.680 µmol-1), and four arrangements: black prick cultivated alone, black prick + Brachiaria decumbens, picao-preto + corn and picao-preto + beans. For bean plants, the factorial scheme was 3 x 3, with the three levels of CO2 in the growth chamber mentioned and the different arrangements: beans cultivated in isolation, beans + picao-preto and beans + Brachiaria decumbens. Higher levels of CO2 promote the greatest gain in height and dry matter mass of the roots, stems and leaves of the crop and the weed. The total chlorophyll content was also higher at the highest levels of CO2 considering the two species evaluated. The increase in CO2 concentration affected the competition dynamics between the species evaluated. In the lowest concentration of ambient CO2, the bean proved to be more competitive with the black-pea plants in relation to the other species evaluated. In the concentrations of 840 and 1.680 µmol mol-1 of CO2, both corn and beans affected the growth of the black-pea plants. Bean plants were negatively affected by living with weeds at all levels of CO2 enrichment analyzed.
References
Awasthi, J. P., Paraste, K. S., Rathore, M.; Varun, M.; Jaggi, D. & Kumar. B. (2018). Effect ofelevated CO2 on Vigna ratiata and two weed species: yield, physiology and crop-weed interaction. Crop and Pastures Science. 69(6): 617-631. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP17192
Cantarutti, R. B., Barros, N. F., Martinez, H. E. P. & Novais, R. F. (2007). Avaliação da Fertilização do Solo e Recomendação de Fertilizantes. In: Novais, RF; Alvarez V., VH; Barros, NF; Fontes, RLF; Cantarutti, RB; Neves, JCL. Fertilidade do solo. Viçosa: SBCS.
Cury, J. P., Santos, J. B., Valadão Silva, D., Carvalho, F. P., Braga, R. R., Byrro, E. C. M. & Ferreira, E. A. (2011). Produção e Partição de Matéria Seca de Cultivares de Feijão em Competição com Plantas Daninhas. Planta Daninha 29 (1): 149-58. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582011000100017
Curry, J. P., Santos, J. B., Silva, E. B., Braga, R. R., Carvalho, F. P., Valadão Silva, D. & Byrro, E. C. M. (2013). Eficiência Nutricional de Cultivares de Feijão em Competição com Plantas Daninhas. Planta Daninha 31 (1): 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582013000100009
Dorneles, K. R., Posso, D. A., Rebhahn, I., Deuner, S., Pazdiora, P. C., Avila, L. A. & Dallagnol, L. J. (2019). Respostas Morfofisiológicas e Rendimento de Grãos do Trigo Mediados pelo Aumento da Concentração de CO2 Atmosférico. Rev Bras Cien Agrárias 14 (1): 1981-0997. https://doi.org/10.5039/agraria.v14i1a5600
Finn, G. A. & Brun, W. A. (1982). Effect of Atmospheric CO2 Enrichment on Growth, Nonstructural Carbohydrate Content, and Root Nodule Activity in Soybean. Plant Physiol 69: 327-31. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.69.2.327
Galon, L., Forte, C. T., Gabiatti, R. L., Radunz, L. L., Aspiazu, I., Kujawinski, R. & Rossetti, J. (2016). Interference and Economic Threshold Level For Control of Beggartick on Bean Cultivars. Planta Daninha 34 (3): 411-22. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582016340300002
Kim, S. H., Jung, W. S., Ahn, J. K., Kim, J. A. & Chung, I. M. (2005). Quantitative Analysis of the Isoflavone Content and Biological Growth of Soybean (Glycine max L.) at Elevated Temperature, CO2 Level and N Application. J Sci Food Agric 85: 2557-66. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2294
Manabe, P. M. S., Matos, C. da C. de, Ferreira, E. A., Silva, A. A. da, Sediyama, T., Manabe, A., Silva, A. F. da, Rocha, P. R. R., & Galon, L. (2014). Características fisiológicas de feijoeiro em competição com plantas daninhas. Bioscience Journal, 30(6). Retrieved from http://www.seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/22147
Pessôa, U. C. M., de Oliveira, K. J. A., Souza, A. S., Pimenta, T. A., Muniz, R. V. S. & Araujo Neto, A. G. (2017). Desempenho Fisiológico e Crescimento do Feijão-Caupi, sob Manejos de Plantas Daninhas. Rev.Verde Agroecologia Desenvolv Sustentável 12 (2): 246-50. https://doi.org/10.18378/rvads.v12i2.5067
Reich, P. B., Hobbie, S. E., Lee, T. D. & Pastore, M. A. (2018). Unexpected Reversal of C3 versus C4 Grass Response to Elevated CO2 During A 20-Year Field Experiment. Science 360 (6386): 317-20. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.aas9313
Santos, J. I., Cesarin, A. E., Sales, C. A. R., Triano, M. B. B., Martins, P. F. R. B., Braga, A. F., Neto, N. J., Barroso, A. A. M., Alves, P. L. C. A. & Huaman, C. A. M. (2017). Increase of Atmosphere CO2 Concentration and Its Effects on Culture/Weed Interaction World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Biological, Biomolecular, Agricultural, Food and Biotechnological Engineering 11 (6):419-426. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1130683
Santos, J. B. & Cury, J. P. (2011). Picão-preto: Uma Planta Daninha Especial em Solos Tropicais. Planta Daninha 29: 1159-71. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582011000500024
Srinivasarao, Ch.; Kundu, S.; Shanker, A. K., Naik, R. P., Vanaja, M., Venkanna, K., Sankar, G. R. M. & Rao, V. U. M. (2016). Continuous cropping under elevated CO2: Differential effects on C4 and C3 crops, soil properties and carbon dynamics in semi-arid alfisols. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 218: 73-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.11.016
Taiz, L.; Zeiger, E. & Moller, I. (2017). Fisiologia e Desenvolvimento Vegetal. Artmed.
.. (2016). Size and Variability of Crop Productivity Both Impacted By CO2 Enrichmentand Warming – A Case Study of 4 Year Field Experiment in a Chinese Paddy. Agric Ecosys Environ 221: 40–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.01.028
Wolf, J. & Ziska, L. (2018). Comment on “Unexpected Reversal of C3 versus C4 Grass Response to Elevated CO2 During a 20-Year Field Experiment. Science 361 (1): 6402. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau1300
Xu, Z.; Jiang, Y. & Zhou, G. (2015). Response and Adaptation of Photosynthesis, Respiration, and Antioxidant Systems to Elevated CO2 with Environmental Stress in Plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 6: 701. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00701
Ziska, L., Blumenthal, D., & Franks, S. (2019). Understanding the nexus of rising CO2, climate change, and evolution in weed biology. Invasive Plant Science and Management, 12(2), 79-88. doi:10.1017/inp.2019.12
Zeng, Q.; Liu, B.; Gilna, B.; Zhang, I.; Zhu, C.; Ma, H.; Pang, J.; Chen, G. & Zhu, J. (2009). Elevated CO2 Effect on Nutrient Competition between a C3 Crop (Oryza Sativa L.) and a C4 Weed (Echinochloa crusgalli L.). Nutrient Cicling in Agroecosystems 89: 93-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-010-9379-z
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Fabíola Mendes Braga; Evander Alves Ferreira; Maria Stêfany Silveira Freitas; Cássia Michelle Cabral; José Barbosa dos Santos; Ignácio Aspiazu; Luiz Arnaldo Fernandes; Regynaldo Arruda Sampaio
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
