Assessment of painful sensitivity after endodontic treatment with WaveOne gold and ProGlider files, with and without prior preparation of the cervical and middle thirds before foraminal patency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i7.16677Keywords:
Apical patency; Postendodontic pain; Postoperative pain.Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate painful symptoms after endodontic treatment, in a single session, on uniradicular teeth with pulp necrosis, varying two techniques of foramen patency: with and without previous preparation of the cervical and middle thirds. Patients were randomly divided into two groups (n = 23). SSP Group (Without Previous Preparation): the endodontic treatment was performed with Wave One Gold files (Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues - Switzerland) associated with the patency with ProGlider (Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues - Switzerland) prior to the preparation of the cervical and middle thirds. CPP Group (with Previous Preparation): endodontic treatment was performed with Wave One Gold files associated with patency with ProGlider after the preparation of the cervical and middle thirds. Irrigation was carried out with 2.5% NaOCl and the channels were filled using the single cone technique with AH Plus cement, using the McSpadden compactor. After treatment, the patients answered a questionnaire with the VAS pain scale, and rated it from 0 to 10, in the periods of 24 hours, 72 hours, and 1 week after treatment. The data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis (Student-Newman-Keuls) Dunn test and Chi-square test. The results showed that in patients who had previously prepared the cervical and middle thirds, there were no statistical differences between pain scores at different experimental times (p = 0.328). The comparison of pain after 24 hours and 72 hours showed statistically similar values (p = 0.384), as did the comparison of 72 hours with one week (p = 1.00). The group without prior preparation revealed significant differences between the results (p = 0.046). Dunn's complementary test showed that the differences were limited to pain scores after 24 hours and the results after one week (p = 0.042). The Mann-Whitney test, applied to data obtained in both experimental groups, revealed that at 24 hours (p = 0.562), 72 hours (p = 1.00) and 1 week (p = 1.00), there were no differences between the types of preparation performed. It was concluded that the levels of pain after endodontic treatment in uniradicular teeth with pulp necrosis with or without previous preparation of the cervical and middle third of the canal presented an equivalent behavior.
References
Arias, A., Azabal, M., Hidalgo, J. J., & José, C. (2009). Relationship between postendodontic pain, tooth diagnostic factors, and apical patency. Journal of endodontics, 35(2), 189-192.
Arias, A., de la Macorra, J. C., Hidalgo, J. J., & Azabal, M. (2013). Predictive models of pain following root canal treatment: a prospective clinical study. International endodontic journal, 46(8), 784-793.
Barciela, B., da Silva Limoeiro, A. G., Bueno, C. E., Fernandes, S. L., Mandarini, D. R., Boer, N. C., ... & Rocha, D. G. (2019). In vivo evaluation of painful symptomatology after endodontic treatment with or without the use of photodynamic therapy. Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD, 22(4), 332.
Berutti, E., Cantatore, G., Castellucci, A., Chiandussi, G., Pera, F., Migliaretti, G., & Pasqualini, D. (2009). Use of nickel-titanium rotary PathFile to create the glide path: comparison with manual preflaring in simulated root canals. Journal of Endodontics, 35(3), 408-412.
Buchanan, L. S. (1989). Management of the curved root canal. J Calif Dent Assoc, 17, 18-25.
Burklein S, Shafer E. Apically Extruded Debris with Reciprocating Single-File and Full-sequence Rotary Instrumentation Systems. J End. 2012;38(6):850-2.
Figini, L., Lodi, G., Gorni, F., & Gagliani, M. (2008). Single versus multiple visits for endodontic treatment of permanent teeth: a Cochrane systematic review. Journal of Endodontics, 34(9), 1041-1047.
Franco, V., Fabiani, C., Taschieri, S., Malentacca, A., Bortolin, M., & Del Fabbro, M. (2011). Investigation on the shaping ability of nickel-titanium files when used with a reciprocating motion. Journal of endodontics, 37(10), 1398-1401.
Haapasalo, M., Shen, Y., Qian, W., & Gao, Y. (2010). Irrigation in endodontics. Dental Clinics, 54(2), 291-312.
Harrison, J. W., Baumgartner, J. C., & Svec, T. A. (1983). Incidence of pain associated with clinical factors during and after root canal therapy. Part 2. Postobturation pain. Journal of endodontics, 9(10), 434-438.
Junior, J. A. C., Coelho, M. S., Kato, A. S., Vivacqua-Gomes, N., Fontana, C. E., Rocha, D. G. P., & da Silveira Bueno, C. E. (2016). The effect of foraminal enlargement of necrotic teeth with the reciproc system on postoperative pain: a prospective and randomized clinical trial. Journal of endodontics, 42(1), 8-11.
Kersten, P., Küçükdeveci, A. A., & Tennant, A. (2012). The use of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in rehabilitation outcomes. Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 44(7), 609-610.
Kherlakian, D., Cunha, R. S., Ehrhardt, I. C., Zuolo, M. L., Kishen, A., & da Silveira Bueno, C. E. (2016). Comparison of the incidence of postoperative pain after using 2 reciprocating systems and a continuous rotary system: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Journal of Endodontics, 42(2), 171-176.
Koçak, S., Koçak, M. M., Sağlam, B. C., Türker, S. A., Sağsen, B., & Er, Ö. (2013). Apical extrusion of debris using self-adjusting file, reciprocating single-file, and 2 rotary instrumentation systems. Journal of endodontics, 39(10), 1278-1280.
Larsen, C. M., Watanabe, I., Glickman, G. N., & He, J. (2009). Cyclic fatigue analysis of a new generation of nickel titanium rotary instruments. Journal of endodontics, 35(3), 401-403.
Marshall, F. J., & Pappin J. (1980). A crown-down pressureless preparation root canal enlargement technique. Oregon Health University.
Myles, P. S., Troedel, S., Boquest, M., & Reeves, M. (1999). The pain visual analog scale: is it linear or nonlinear?Anesthesia & Analgesia, 87(6), 1517.
Pruett, J. P., Clement, D. J., & Carnes Jr, D. L. (1997). Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. Journal of endodontics, 23(2), 77-85.
Raju, T. B. V. G., Seshadri, A., Vamsipavani, B., Abhilash, K., Subhash, A. V., & Kumari, K. H. (2014). Evaluation of pain in single and multi rooted teeth treated in single visit endodontic therapy. Journal of international oral health: JIOH, 6(1), 27.
Roane, J. B., Sabala, C. L., & Duncanson Jr, M. G. (1985). The “balanced force” concept for instrumentation of curved canals. Journal of endodontics, 11(5), 203-211.
Robinson, J. P., Lumley, P. J., Cooper, P. R., Grover, L. M., & Walmsley, A. D. (2013). Reciprocating root canal technique induces greater debris accumulation than a continuous rotary technique as assessed by 3-dimensional micro–computed tomography. Journal of Endodontics, 39(8), 1067-1070.
Sathorn, C., Parashos, P., & Messer, H. (2008). The prevalence of postoperative pain and flare‐up in single‐and multiple‐visit endodontic treatment: a systematic review. International endodontic journal, 41(2), 91-99.
Schilder, H. (2006). Filling root canals in three dimensions. Journal of endodontics, 32(4), 281-290.
Shen, Y., Zhou, H. M., Zheng, Y. F., Peng, B., & Haapasalo, M. (2013). Current challenges and concepts of the thermomechanical treatment of nickel-titanium instruments. Journal of endodontics, 39(2), 163-172.
Silva, E. J. N. L., Menaged, K., Ajuz, N., Monteiro, M. R. F. P., & de Souza Coutinho-Filho, T. (2013). Postoperative pain after foraminal enlargement in anterior teeth with necrosis and apical periodontitis: a prospective and randomized clinical trial. Journal of endodontics, 39(2), 173-176.
Souza, R. A. (2000). Limpeza de forame e sua relação com a dor pós-operatória. Jornal Brasileiro de Endo/Perio, 1(3), 45-8.
Walia, H., Brantley, W. A., & Gerstein, H. (1988). An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. Journal of endodontics, 14(7), 346-351.
Yared G. A 3-year Outcome of Endododontic Treatment Done with the RECIPROC® Single File Canal Preparation System. Munich, VDW; 2012.
You, S. Y., Kim, H. C., Bae, K. S., Baek, S. H., Kum, K. Y., & Lee, W. (2011). Shaping ability of reciprocating motion in curved root canals: a comparative study with micro–computed tomography. Journal of endodontics, 37(9), 1296-1300.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Fabrício Silva Santos; Ana Grasiela Limoeiro; Alexandre Sigrist De Martin; Carlos Eduardo Fontana; Sérgio Luiz Pinheiro; Rina Andrea Pelegrine; Daniel Guimarães Pedro Rocha; Wayne Martins Nascimento; Carlos Eduardo da Silveira Bueno
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
