Reality of cross-nursing in a Philanthropic Maternity Hospital in Aracaju, Sergipe
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i13.21633Keywords:
Cross-nursing; Breastfeeding; Breast-feeding; Breast milk.Abstract
Objective. This study aims to assess the knowlegde of the women about the practice of crossfeeding. Methods. Observational, prospective and analytical study carried out in a Philanthropic Hospital and Maternity in Aracaju SE, from August to November 2021. The population used in the research consisted of mothers referred to rooming-in and specialized outpatient clinic of the Hospital and Maternity Santa Isabel, being applied a questionnaire by the researchers. Results. The prevalence of cross-breastfeeding was 49.16%, considering that 31.11% (n=42) of the mothers breastfed one or more children other than their child and 18.05% (n=24) had their child breastfed for one or more nursing mothers. 62.22% of them did not know what cross-breastfeeding was. 52, 59% were aged between 21 and 30 years. As for the race, most were configured as non-white. 16.30% lived in rural areas. Less than half, 40.60%, declared themselves to be married or in a stable relationship. 74.81%, lived with less than one salary at one minimum wage per month and also did not have a formal paid job, 87.41%. 65.19% of them received Bolsa Família aid. Only 5.19% had completed or incomplete higher education. When the variables were compared, two P-values were noted with significance levels, p=0.002 and p=0.031, corresponding to whether mothers knew the risk of cross-breastfeeding or whether they had been breastfed by a woman other than the mother, respectively. Conclusion. Despite being prohibited in Brazil, crossfeeding is still recurrent, in high percentages and there is a lack of information on the subject.
References
Al-Naqeeb, N. A., Azab, A., Eliwa, M. S., & Mohammed, B. Y. (2000). The introduction of breast milk donation in a Muslim country. Journal of human lactation: official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association, 16(4), 346–350. doi.org/10.1177/089033440001600412.
Buges, N. M., Klinger, K. S. A., & Pereira, R. J. (2020). New mothers and their understanding about breast milk donation. Rev. Bras. Saude Mater. Infant, 20(1), 213-225.
Can, Ş. & Ünülü, M. (2019). Knowledge of Mother Regarding Wet Nursery and Breast Milk Banking. Ankara Medical Journal, 19 (1), 60-70. doi.org/10.17098/amj.542150.
Carvalho, M. R. (2013). Amamentação Cruzada e Amas de Leite: práticas não recomendadas. http://www.aleitamento.com/ama mentacao/conteudo.asp?cod=1561.
Gomes, C. S., Dias, M. O., Rodrigues, B. M. R. D., Peres, P. L. P., Arantes, P. C. C., & Rodrigues, B. R. D. (2020). Amamentação cruzada no cenário da precarização do trabalho em saúde: atuação do enfermeiro [Cross-breastfeeding in the scenario of health work precarization: nurse’s role] [Lactancia cruzada en el escenario de precarización del trabajo de salud: papel de la enfermera]. Revista Enfermagem UERJ, 28, e35224. doi.org/10.12957/reuerj.2020.35224.
Karadag, A., Ozdemir, R., Ak, M., Ozer, A., Dogan, D. G., & Elkiran, O. (2015). Human milk banking and milk kinship: Perspectives of mothers in a Muslim country. Journal of tropical pediatrics, 61(3), 188–196. doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fmv018.
Kaur, M., Raghuvanshi, S., & Kang, H. K. (2019). Knowledge and Attitude of Indian Parous Women toward Human Milk Banking. Indian journal of community medicine: official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine, 44(2), 175–176. doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_377_18.
Koutsoukos, S. S. M. (2009). 'Amas mercenárias': O discurso dos doutores em medicina e os retratos de amas - Brasil, segunda metade do século XIX. Hist. Cienc. Saude -Man¬guinhos, 16(2), 305-324. doi.org/10.1590/S0104-59702009000200002.
Lima, T. A., Martins, F. A., & Ramalho, A. A. (2021). Prevalência de aleitamento cruzado no século XXI: uma revisão integrativa/ Prevalence of cross-breastfeeding in the 21st century: an integrative review. Brazilian Journal of Health Review, 4(2), 5281-5289. doi.org/ 10.34119/bjhrv4n2-101
Ministério da Saúde. (n.d.) Portaria nº 1.016, de 26 de agosto de 1993. https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/1993/prt1016_26_08_1993.html.
Pereira, C. R. G., Pereira, W. M. M., Gonçalves, N. V., Ravena-Cañete, V., Dias, F. A., & Tavares, C. G. M. (2015). Prevalência de aleitamento cruzado e saberes sobre esta prática. Revista Paraense de Medicina, 29(3) jul-set 2015.
Santiago, L. B, Mattar, M. J. G. (2007). Boletim Informativo da Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria. 6. out 2006/jan 2007. Departamento Científico de Amamentação.
Sauer, C. W., & Marc-Aurele, K. L. (2016). Parent Misidentification Leading to the Breastfeeding of the Wrong Baby in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. The American journal of case reports, 17, 574–579. doi.org/10.12659/ajcr.898864.
Seehausen, M. P. von, Oliveira, M. I. C. de, Boccolini, C. S., & Leal, M. do C. (2017). Fatores associados ao aleitamento cruzado em duas cidades do Sudeste do Brasil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 33(4), 1-10. doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00038516.
Stevens, E. E., Patrick, T. E., & Pickler, R. (2009). A history of infant feeding. The Journal of perinatal education, 18(2), 32–39. doi.org/10.1624/105812409X426314.
Vieira, A. C. J., Amaral, D. F., Pedrosa, K. J, & Ichisato, S. M. T. (2001). Conhecimento das puérperas sobre o aleitamento cruzado. Revista do Centro Universitário Barão de Mauá, 1(2), 1-12. Retrieved from http://www.baraodemaua.edu.br/comunicacao/publicacoes/jornal/v1n2/artigo03.html.
Vieira, G. O., Issler, H., & Teruya, K. M. (2010). Amamentação e doenças maternas. In Tratado de pediatria. Barueri: Manole.
Von Seehausen, M. P., Oliveira, & M. I. C., & Boccolini, C. S. (2017). Fatores associados ao aleitamento cruzado. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 22(5), 1673–1682.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2003) Global strategy for infant and young child feeding. Geneva: WHO.
World Health Organization (WHO), Unicef, Pan American Health Organization. (2010). Haiti earthquake: Technical note on HIV and infant feeding. Geneva: WHO.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Giovanna Pimentel Oliveira Silva; Izailza Matos Dantas Lopes; José Rodrigo Santos Silva; Kaylane Fernanda Lima Santos; Alessandro Santos Ferrreira; Winny Mikaelly Gonçalves Resende
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.