In Vitro Study of simulated canal cleaning (Wave One Gold x W-File)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i13.21693Keywords:
Simulated canals; Endodontics; Instrumentation; Reciprocating instruments; Wave One Gold; W-File.Abstract
Objective: Cleaning and shaping of the root canal are important steps in endodontic treatment and may influence the final success of the treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the modeling of the reciprocal instruments Wave One Gold (WOG - Dentisply, Maillefer, Baillagues, Switzerland) and W-File (WF - Shenzlen superfine Technology Co, China) in simulated root canals. Materials and methods: 20 acrylic blocks were used, divided into two groups (n=10): group 1 - WOG; group 2 - WF. Before root canal preparation, the patency of the root canal was checked with a #10 K file. Pre- and postoperative photographic images were created in image processing software (Adobe Photoshop CS5.1) for later overlay and analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using the t-test and Mann Whitney test. Results: With the Wave One Gold instrument, more resin was removed from the outside of the curve at all points examined (p < 0.05). In terms of canal transport, there were significant differences in canal opening (p < 0.05). The Wave One Gold instrument had wider preparations. It was concluded that both the Wave One Gold Instrument and the W-File are safe for use in curved canals and promote good cleaning and shaping, with the WF achieving more conservative preparations.
References
Berutti, E., Paolino, D. S., Chiandussi, G., Alovisi, M., Cantatore, G., Castellucci, A., & Pasqualini, D. (2012). Root canal anatomy preservation of WaveOne reciprocating files with or without glide path. Journal of endodontics, 38(1), 101-104.
Calefi, P. H. S., Osaki, R. B., Dal Evedove, N. F., Cruz, V. M., & de Andrade, F. B. Alcalde MP. (2020). Cyclic and torcional fatigue resistance of W File and X1 Blue file reciprocating instruments. Dental Press Endodontics. 10(2), 60-66.
Dummer, P. M. H., Alodeh, M. H. A., & Al‐Omari, M. A. O. (1991). A method for the construction of simulated root canals in clear resin blocks. International endodontic journal, 24(2), 63-66.
Gagliardi, J., Versiani, M. A., de Sousa-Neto, M. D., Plazas-Garzon, A., & Basrani, B. (2015). Evaluation of the shaping characteristics of ProTaper Gold, ProTaper NEXT, and ProTaper Universal in curved canals. Journal of endodontics, 41(10), 1718-1724.
Hülsmann, M., Gressmann, G., & Schäfers, F. (2003). A comparative study of root canal preparation using FlexMaster and HERO 642 rotary Ni–Ti instruments. International Endodontic Journal, 36(5), 358-366.
Keskin, C., Demiral, M., & Sarıyılmaz, E. (2018). Comparison of the shaping ability of novel thermally treated reciprocating instruments. Restorative dentistry & endodontics, 43(2).
Da Silva Limoeiro, A. G., Henrique Braitt, A., Rofrigues, E. A., Rabelo bRAItt, G., & da Silveira bueno, C. E. (2014). Evaluation of the cleaning ability of two rotatory nickel-titanium systems: Protaper universal and heat-treated ProDesign s. Dental Press Endodontics. 34-39.
Lim, Y. J., Park, S. J., Kim, H. C., & Min, K. S. (2013). Comparison of the centering ability of Wave· One and Reciproc nickel-titanium instruments in simulated curved canals. Restorative dentistry & endodontics, 38(1), 21-25.
De Menezes, S. E. A. C., Batista, S. M., Lira, J. O. P., & de Melo Monteiro, G. Q. (2017). Cyclic fatigue resistance of WaveOne Gold, ProDesign R and ProDesign Logic files in curved canals in vitro. Iranian endodontic journal, 12(4), 468.
Özyürek, T. (2016). Cyclic fatigue resistance of Reciproc, WaveOne, and WaveOne Gold nickel-titanium instruments. Journal of endodontics, 42(10), 1536-1539.
Piazza, G. C., Capello, P. A., Ferreira. R., Blatt, J. A., de Araújo. S. M., Almeida, C. N. (2021). Avaliação do número de canais modelados com limas Prodesing M até sua fratura, simulado em blocos de resina acrílica. Revista Orbis Science. 1(1), 46-56.
Plotino, G., Grande, N. M., Testarelli, L., & Gambarini, G. (2012). Cyclic fatigue of Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating instruments. International Endodontic Journal, 45(7), 614-618.
Pruett, J. P., Clement, D. J., & Carnes Jr, D. L. (1997). Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. Journal of endodontics, 23(2), 77-85.
Rebeiz, J., El Hachem, C., El Osta, N., Habib, M., Rebeiz, T., Zogheib, C., & Kaloustian, M. K. (2021). Shaping ability of a new heat-treated NiTi system in continuous rotation or reciprocation in artificial curved canals. Odontology, 1-10.
Schilder, H. (1974). Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am, 18, 269-296.
Shen, Y., Zhou, H. M., Zheng, Y. F., Peng, B., & Haapasalo, M. (2013). Current challenges and concepts of the thermomechanical treatment of nickel-titanium instruments. Journal of endodontics, 39(2), 163-172.
Van Der Vyver, P. J., Paleker, F., Vorster, M., & Francois, A. (2019). Root canal shaping using nickel titanium, M-wire, and gold wire: A micro–computed tomographic comparative study of one shape, ProTaper next, and WaveOne gold instruments in maxillary first molars. Journal of endodontics, 45(1), 62-67.
Webber, J. (2015). Shaping canals with confidence: WaveOne GOLD single-file reciprocating system. Roots, 1(3), 34-40.
Yang, G. B., Zhou, X. D., Zhang, H., & Wu, H. K. (2006). Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in simulated root canals. International endodontic journal, 39(10), 791-799.
Yared, G. (2008). Canal preparation using only one Ni‐Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations. International endodontic journal, 41(4), 339-344.
Yoo, Y. S., & Cho, Y. B. (2012). A comparison of the shaping ability of reciprocating NiTi instruments in simulated curved canals. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 37(4), 220-227.
Zanin, E., Langaro, M. C., Pelepenko, L. E., Machado, R. L., Fornari, V. J., Hartmann, M. S. M. (2020). Resistência à fratura de instrumentos reciprocantes Wave One Gold e W-File. Full Dentistry In Science. 11(44), 94-98.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Marcely Reis Silva; Adolfo de Matos de Carvalho; Matheus Almeida Rodrigues; Edeilton Santana de Oliveira Júnior e Bezerra; Caio Cesar Souza; Cesar Augusto Perini Rosas; Ryhan Menezes Cardoso; Ana Grasiela da Silva Limoeiro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.