Digital versus conventional technology for making Complete Denture: a systematic review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i2.25625Keywords:
CAD-CAM; Complete denture; Advantage.Abstract
Objective: To assess whether the CAD/CAM technology is superior to the conventional technique for making Tissue Born total dentures. Methodology: This review followed the PRISMA recommendations. A systematic review was carried out by two calibrated reviewers in the Medline-PubMed, Scopus, Scielo, Lilacs, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases, using the descriptors: “Complete denture”, “Complete dentures”, “Total denture”, “Total dentures”, “Complete prosthesis”, “Complete prosthesis”, “Total prosthesis”, “Total prosthesis”, “Computer Aided Design”, “Computer Aided Manufacturing”, “CAD/CAM”, ''Benefits” and “Advantage”. Only in vitro studies comparing CAD/CAM technology (printing or milling) with conventional manufacturing were included, and studies without a control group and prostheses on implants were excluded. Results: The strategy used resulted in 410 articles. Of these, 11 met the inclusion criteria. After reading in full, only 6 were included in the systematic review. Despite requiring a high investment and professional training, the selected studies demonstrated the following advantages of the CAD/CAM system over the conventional one: less monomer release and better adaptation of the dentures Conclusion: The manufacturing process of total dentures through the system CAD/CAM proved to be advantageous compared to the conventional method, the main one being the lower release of monomer, accompanied by better biomechanical qualities and marginal adaptation, despite its high cost.
References
Atieh M.A, Ritter A.V., Ko C.C.& Duqum I. (2017). Accuracy evaluation of intraoral optical impressions: A clinical study using a reference appliance. J Prosthet Dent. 118(3):400-5.
Ayman A.D. (2017). The residual monomer content and mechanical properties of CADCAM resins used in the fabrication of complete dentures as compared to heat cured resins. Electron Physician. 25;9(7):4766-72.
Baba, N. Z., Goodacre, C. J., & Kattadiyil, M. T. (2015). CAD/CAM removable prosthodontics. Masri R, Driscoll CF. Clinical applications of digital dental technology. Hoboken, 107-10.
Bilgin, M. S., Baytaroğlu, E. N., Erdem, A., & Dilber, E. (2016). A review of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacture techniques for removable denture fabrication. European journal of dentistry, 10(2), 286.
Goodacre, B. J., Goodacre, C. J., Baba, N. Z. & Kattadiyil, M. T. (2016). Comparison of denture base adaptation between CAD-CAM and conventional fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent, 116(2), 249-256.
Howick, J., Chalmers, I., Glasziou, P., Greenhalgh, T., Heneghan, C., Liberati, A., et al. (2011). The 2011 Oxford CEBM Evidence levels of evidence (introductory document). Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, 1-3.
Hwang, H. J., Lee, S. J., Park, E. J. & Yoon, H. I. (2019). Assessment of the trueness and tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM maxillary denture bases manufactured using digital light processing. J Prosthet Dent, 121(1), 110-117.
Joda, T. & Brägger, U. (2016). Patient-centered outcomes comparing digital and conventional implant impression procedures: a randomized crossover trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 27(12), 185–89.
Koulivand S.; Ghodsi S.; Siadat H. & Alikhasi M. (2019). A clinical comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques regarding finish line locations and impression time. Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jerd.12527.
Ludovichetti F.S., Trindade F.Z., Werner A., Kleverlaan C.J.& Fonseca R.G. (2018). Wear resistance and abrasiveness of CAD-CAM monolithic materials. J Prosthet Dent. Aug;120(2):318.e1-318.e8.
Masri, G., Mortada, R., Ounsi, H., Alharbi, N., Boulos, P. & Salameh, Z. (2020). Adaptation of Complete Denture Base Fabricated by Conventional, Milling, and 3-D Printing Techniques: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract, 21(4), 367-371.
McLaughlin, J. B., Ramos Jr., V. & Dickinson, D. P. (2019). Comparison of Fit of Dentures Fabricated by Traditional Techniques Versus CAD/CAM Technology. J Prosthodont, 28(4), 428-435.
Melo, L.A.; Lima C.M; Ferrarez L.L.; Silva D.N. Leite F.P.P. (2020). Precisão da adaptação de próteses totais feitas com a tecnologia CAD / CAM: uma revisão sistemática. Pesquisa, Sociedade e Desenvolvimento, 9(10), n. 10, e6839109154.
Moher D., Shamseer L., Clarke M., Ghersi D., Liberati A., Petticrew M., Shekelle P.& Stewart L.A. Declaração de 2015 dos itens de relatório preferidos para protocolos de revisão sistemática e meta-análise (PRISMA-P). Syst Rev. 2015; 4 (1): 1. 10.1186 / 2046-4053-4-1
Paixão, F., Ramos, G. D. G., & Cruz, M. V. D. J. (2007). Evaluation of the reproducibility of two techniques used to determine and record centric relation in angle's class I patients. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 15(4), 275-279.
Peng L., Chen L., Harris B.T., Bhandari B., Morton D.& Lin W.S. (2018). Accuracy and reproducibility of virtual edentulous casts created by laboratory impression scan protocols. J Prosthet Dent. Sep. 120(3):389-395.
Sotto Maior B.S, Filgueiras A., Gonçalves Pinto D., Ferrarez L. L., de Oliveira M. F.& Freitas T.A. de C. (2018). Aplicabilidade clínica dos avanços da tecnologia CAD-CAM em Odontologia. hu rev;44(1):29-34.
Steinmassl, O., Dumfahrt, H., Grunert, I., & Steinmassl, P. A. (2018). Influence of CAD/CAM fabrication on denture surface properties. Journal of oral rehabilitation, 45(5), 406-413.
Steinmassl P.A., Wiedemair V., Huck C., Klaunzer F., Steinmassl O., Grunert I. & Dumfahrt H. (2017). Do CAD/CAM dentures really release less monomer than conventional dentures? Clin Oral Investig. Jun. 21(5):1697-705.
Srinivasan, M., Kalberer, N., Naharro, M., Marchand, L., Lee, H., & Müller, F. (2020). CAD-CAM milled dentures: The Geneva protocols for digital dentures. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 123(1), 27-37.
Srinivasan, M., Gjengedal, H., Cattani-Lorente, M., Moussa, M., Durual, S., Schimmel, M. & Müller, F. (2018). CAD/CAM milled complete removable dental prostheses: An in vitro evaluation of biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and surface roughness. Dent Mater J, 37(4), 526–533.
Tavares, C. C., Freire, J. C. P., Freire, S. C. P., Dias-Ribeiro, E., & Batista, A. U. D. (2019). Aplicabilidade dos sistemas CAD/CAM em Prótese Total: revisão de literatura. Arch Health Invest, 7(11).
Vasques, M. T., & Laganá, D. C. (2018). Accuracy and Internal Fit of 3D printed Occlusal Splint, according to the printing position: A technique report. Clinical and Laboratorial Research in Dentistry.
Wemken G., Spies B.C., Pieralli S., Adali U., Beuer F. & Wesemann C. (2020). Do hydrothermal aging and microwave sterilization affect the trueness of milled, additive manufactured and injection molded denture bases? J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 111:103975.
Yuzbasioglu E., Kurt H., Turunc R. & Bilir H. (2014). Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients' perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health30; 14:10.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Larissa Costa Freitas; Flávia Braga de Oliveira; Camila Moreira Lima; Jean Soares Miranda ; Fabíola Pessôa Pereira Leite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
