A quantitative indicator for assessing the degree of maturity of industrial symbiosis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i6.29348

Keywords:

Circular economy; Industrial symbiosis; Indicator; Degree of Maturity of Industrial Symbiosis.

Abstract

The linear production model based on extract, produce, use and dispose is reaching its limit due to environmental impacts and scarcity of resources. The circular economy appears in opposition to this production model, with principles based on eliminating waste and pollution, keeping materials in use and recovering natural systems. Industrial symbiosis is indicated to put into practice the principles of the circular economy, through the creation of synergies and mutual cooperation between industries, where they can share resources and reuse production residues. In order to understand how industrial symbiosis can contribute to the implementation of the circular economy, this work assessed the degree of maturity of industrial symbiosis in a flat glass production company, through the indicator degree of maturity of industrial symbiosis, which lists the seven barriers of industrial symbiosis against the five stages of maturity. To quantify the degree of maturity of the industrial symbiosis, an Equation was created, an original production of this work, which made it possible to identify that the company currently has 28,5% of the degree of maturity, making it possible to identify what can be improved, facilitating the decision-making process.

References

Abreu, M. C. S. de, & Ceglia, D. (2018). On the implementation of a circular economy: The role of institutional capacity-building through industrial symbiosis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 138(June), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.07.001

Akerman, M. (2014). Indústria do Vidro Mauro Akerman., Abividro, Escola do Vidro.

Benachio, G. L. F., Freitas, M. do C. D., & Tavares, S. F. (2020). Circular economy in the construction industry: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 260, 121046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121046

Berardi, P., & Dias, J. M. (2018). O mercado da economia circular: Como os negócios estão sendo afetados pelo modelo que substitui o linear e como serão ainda mais a médio e longo prazos. GV-Executivo, 17(5), 34–37.

Burlingame, B. (2001). What is a nutrient? Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 14(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfca.2001.0978

Chertow, M. R. (2000). Industrial symbiosis: Literature and taxonomy. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 25, 313–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.313

Colglazier, B. W. (2015). Sustainable development agenda: 2030. Science.yr:2015 vol:349 iss:6252 pg:1048 -1050.

Delgado-Aguilar, M., Puig, R., Sazdovski, I., & Fullana-i-Palmer, P. (2020). Polylactic acid/polycaprolactone blends: On the path to circular economy, substituting single-use commodity plastic products. Materials, 13(11), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13112655

Ellen Macarthur Foundation (2012). Towards the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2, 23-44.

Felicio, M., Amaral, D., Esposto, K., & Gabarrell Durany, X. (2016). Industrial symbiosis indicators to manage eco-industrial parks as dynamic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 118, 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.031

Fraccascia, L., & Giannoccaro, I. (2020). What, where, and how measuring industrial symbiosis: A reasoned taxonomy of relevant indicators. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 157(February), 104799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104799

Fraser, P., Moultrie, J., Gregory, M., & Lane, M. (2002). Fraser P , Moultrie J , Gregory M , ( 2002 ), The use of maturity models / grids as a tool in assessing product development capability : a review , IEEE International Engineering The use of maturity models / grids as a tool in assessing product developmen. 18–20.

Freire, L. L. R. (2016). Industria de Vidros Planos. Caderno Setorial ETENE, Banco do Nordeste do Brasil, ano 1, n.1.

Geng, Y., Liu, Z., Xue, B., Dong, H., Fujita, T., & Chiu, A. (2014). Emergy-based assessment on industrial symbiosis: a case of Shenyang Economic and Technological Development Zone. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 21(23), 13572–13587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3287-8

Golev, A., Corder, G. D., & Giurco, D. P. (2015). Barriers to Industrial Symbiosis: Insights from the Use of a Maturity Grid. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19(1), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12159

Gregson, N., Crang, M., Fuller, S., & Holmes, H. (2015). Interrogating the circular economy: the moral economy of resource recovery in the EU. Economy and Society, 44(2), 218–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2015.1013353

Gulipac, S. (2016). Industrial Symbiosis : Building on Kalundborg ’ s waste management experience. 17(1), 2015–2017.

Harris, S. (2004). Drivers and Barriers to Industrial Ecology in the UK. Ph.D. Thesis, the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK 1–211.

Herzer, E., Robinson, L. C., & Fabiano de Lima, N. (2017). Simbiose Industrial E Produção Mais Limpa Como Industrial Simbiosis and Clean Production As. 273–288.

Leigh, M., & Li, X. (2015). Industrial ecology, industrial symbiosis and supply chain environmental sustainability: A case study of a large UK distributor. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 632–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.022

Mantese, G. C., & Amaral, D. C. (2016). Identification and qualitative comparison of performance indicators of industrial symbiosis. Revista Produção Online, 16(4), 1329. https://doi.org/10.14488/1676-1901.v16i4.2349

Mortensen, L., & Kørnøv, L. (2019). Critical factors for industrial symbiosis emergence process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.222

Mota, R. C., & Abreu, M. C. S. de. (2015). Simbiose industrial no complexo industrial e portuário do Pecém: explorando elementos determinantes e barreiras. XVI Congresso Latino-Iberoamericano de Gestão Da Tecnologia. http://www.altec2015.org/anais/altec/papers/758.pdf

Mulrow, J. S., Derrible, S., Ashton, W. S., & Chopra, S. S. (2017). Industrial Symbiosis at the Facility Scale. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 559–571. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12592

Neely, A. D., Gregory, M. & Platts, K. (1995), Performance measurement system design: a literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 80-116

Prieto-sandoval, V., Jaca, C., & Ormazabal, M. (2018). Towards a consensus on the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 179, 605–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.224

Seroka-stolka, O., & Ociepa-kubicka, A. (2019). ScienceDirect ScienceDirect Green logistics and circular economy Green logistics and circular economy Green Cities 2018. Transportation Research Procedia, 39(2018), 471–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2019.06.049

Shulla, K., Leal Filho, W., Lardjane, S., Sommer, J. H., Salvia, A. L., & Borgemeister, C. (2019). The contribution of Regional Centers of Expertise for the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117809

Valenzuela-Venegas, G., Salgado, J. C., & Díaz-Alvarado, F. A. (2016). Sustainability indicators for the assessment of eco-industrial parks: classification and criteria for selection. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.113

Velenturf, A. P. M., Archer, S. A., Gomes, H. I., Christgen, B., Lag-Brotons, A. J., & Purnell, P. (2019). Circular economy and the matter of integrated resources. Science of the Total Environment, 689, 963–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.449

Wen, Z., & Meng, X. (2015). Quantitative assessment of industrial symbiosis for the promotion of circular economy: A case study of the printed circuit boards industry in China’s Suzhou New District. Journal of Cleaner Production, 90, 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.041

Wendler, R. (2012). The maturity of maturity model research: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology, 54(12), 1317–1339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2012.07.007

Published

02/05/2022

How to Cite

FABRIS, M. M. .; SABBADINI, F. S. .; COSTA, K. A. . A quantitative indicator for assessing the degree of maturity of industrial symbiosis. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 6, p. e43911629348, 2022. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v11i6.29348. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29348. Acesso em: 18 may. 2022.

Issue

Section

Engineerings