Un indicador cuantitativo para evaluar el grado de madurez de la simbiosis industrial

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i6.29348

Palabras clave:

Economía circular; Simbiosis industrial; Indicador; Grado de Madurez de la Simbiosis Industrial.

Resumen

El modelo de producción lineal basado en extraer, producir, usar y descartar está llegando a sus límites debido a los impactos ambientales y de recursos. La economía circular surge en oposición a un modelo de conservación de sistemas y mantenimiento de materiales en uso de los sistemas naturales. La simbología industrial está indicada para poner en práctica los principios de la economía circular, a través de la cooperación y cooperación entre recursos como utilidades y recursos, donde además pueden compartir recursos y aprovechar los desechos de producción. Para entender cómo la simbiosis industrial puede contribuir a la implementación de la economía circular, este valor de madurez de la simbiosis industrial en una empresa se puede hacer de vidrio plano, a través del indicador grado de madurez de la simbiosis industrial, que contrapone las siete barreras de la simbiosis industrial. contra cinco años de vencimiento. Para cuantificar el grado de madurez de la simbiosis industrial, se elaboró una Ecuación de Producción, que permitió que la empresa tenga actualmente 28,5% del grado de madurez, la original para identificar lo que se puede mejorar, además, para identificar los proceso de toma de decisión.

Citas

Abreu, M. C. S. de, & Ceglia, D. (2018). On the implementation of a circular economy: The role of institutional capacity-building through industrial symbiosis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 138(June), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.07.001

Akerman, M. (2014). Indústria do Vidro Mauro Akerman., Abividro, Escola do Vidro.

Benachio, G. L. F., Freitas, M. do C. D., & Tavares, S. F. (2020). Circular economy in the construction industry: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 260, 121046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121046

Berardi, P., & Dias, J. M. (2018). O mercado da economia circular: Como os negócios estão sendo afetados pelo modelo que substitui o linear e como serão ainda mais a médio e longo prazos. GV-Executivo, 17(5), 34–37.

Burlingame, B. (2001). What is a nutrient? Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 14(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfca.2001.0978

Chertow, M. R. (2000). Industrial symbiosis: Literature and taxonomy. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 25, 313–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.313

Colglazier, B. W. (2015). Sustainable development agenda: 2030. Science.yr:2015 vol:349 iss:6252 pg:1048 -1050.

Delgado-Aguilar, M., Puig, R., Sazdovski, I., & Fullana-i-Palmer, P. (2020). Polylactic acid/polycaprolactone blends: On the path to circular economy, substituting single-use commodity plastic products. Materials, 13(11), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13112655

Ellen Macarthur Foundation (2012). Towards the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2, 23-44.

Felicio, M., Amaral, D., Esposto, K., & Gabarrell Durany, X. (2016). Industrial symbiosis indicators to manage eco-industrial parks as dynamic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 118, 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.031

Fraccascia, L., & Giannoccaro, I. (2020). What, where, and how measuring industrial symbiosis: A reasoned taxonomy of relevant indicators. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 157(February), 104799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104799

Fraser, P., Moultrie, J., Gregory, M., & Lane, M. (2002). Fraser P , Moultrie J , Gregory M , ( 2002 ), The use of maturity models / grids as a tool in assessing product development capability : a review , IEEE International Engineering The use of maturity models / grids as a tool in assessing product developmen. 18–20.

Freire, L. L. R. (2016). Industria de Vidros Planos. Caderno Setorial ETENE, Banco do Nordeste do Brasil, ano 1, n.1.

Geng, Y., Liu, Z., Xue, B., Dong, H., Fujita, T., & Chiu, A. (2014). Emergy-based assessment on industrial symbiosis: a case of Shenyang Economic and Technological Development Zone. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 21(23), 13572–13587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3287-8

Golev, A., Corder, G. D., & Giurco, D. P. (2015). Barriers to Industrial Symbiosis: Insights from the Use of a Maturity Grid. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19(1), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12159

Gregson, N., Crang, M., Fuller, S., & Holmes, H. (2015). Interrogating the circular economy: the moral economy of resource recovery in the EU. Economy and Society, 44(2), 218–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2015.1013353

Gulipac, S. (2016). Industrial Symbiosis : Building on Kalundborg ’ s waste management experience. 17(1), 2015–2017.

Harris, S. (2004). Drivers and Barriers to Industrial Ecology in the UK. Ph.D. Thesis, the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK 1–211.

Herzer, E., Robinson, L. C., & Fabiano de Lima, N. (2017). Simbiose Industrial E Produção Mais Limpa Como Industrial Simbiosis and Clean Production As. 273–288.

Leigh, M., & Li, X. (2015). Industrial ecology, industrial symbiosis and supply chain environmental sustainability: A case study of a large UK distributor. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 632–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.022

Mantese, G. C., & Amaral, D. C. (2016). Identification and qualitative comparison of performance indicators of industrial symbiosis. Revista Produção Online, 16(4), 1329. https://doi.org/10.14488/1676-1901.v16i4.2349

Mortensen, L., & Kørnøv, L. (2019). Critical factors for industrial symbiosis emergence process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.222

Mota, R. C., & Abreu, M. C. S. de. (2015). Simbiose industrial no complexo industrial e portuário do Pecém: explorando elementos determinantes e barreiras. XVI Congresso Latino-Iberoamericano de Gestão Da Tecnologia. http://www.altec2015.org/anais/altec/papers/758.pdf

Mulrow, J. S., Derrible, S., Ashton, W. S., & Chopra, S. S. (2017). Industrial Symbiosis at the Facility Scale. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 559–571. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12592

Neely, A. D., Gregory, M. & Platts, K. (1995), Performance measurement system design: a literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 80-116

Prieto-sandoval, V., Jaca, C., & Ormazabal, M. (2018). Towards a consensus on the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 179, 605–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.224

Seroka-stolka, O., & Ociepa-kubicka, A. (2019). ScienceDirect ScienceDirect Green logistics and circular economy Green logistics and circular economy Green Cities 2018. Transportation Research Procedia, 39(2018), 471–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2019.06.049

Shulla, K., Leal Filho, W., Lardjane, S., Sommer, J. H., Salvia, A. L., & Borgemeister, C. (2019). The contribution of Regional Centers of Expertise for the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117809

Valenzuela-Venegas, G., Salgado, J. C., & Díaz-Alvarado, F. A. (2016). Sustainability indicators for the assessment of eco-industrial parks: classification and criteria for selection. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.113

Velenturf, A. P. M., Archer, S. A., Gomes, H. I., Christgen, B., Lag-Brotons, A. J., & Purnell, P. (2019). Circular economy and the matter of integrated resources. Science of the Total Environment, 689, 963–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.449

Wen, Z., & Meng, X. (2015). Quantitative assessment of industrial symbiosis for the promotion of circular economy: A case study of the printed circuit boards industry in China’s Suzhou New District. Journal of Cleaner Production, 90, 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.041

Wendler, R. (2012). The maturity of maturity model research: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology, 54(12), 1317–1339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2012.07.007

Publicado

02/05/2022

Cómo citar

FABRIS, M. M. .; SABBADINI, F. S. .; COSTA, K. A. . Un indicador cuantitativo para evaluar el grado de madurez de la simbiosis industrial. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 6, p. e43911629348, 2022. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v11i6.29348. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29348. Acesso em: 30 jun. 2024.

Número

Sección

Ingenierías