Creative learning of sustainable educational robotics in Youth and Adult Education: perspective of sustainable development and access for all
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i7.29994Keywords:
Sustainable development; Sustainable robotics; EJA; Teaching; Health teaching.Abstract
This article aims to share and reflect on a case study involving the use of sustainable educational robotics in Youth and Adult Education (EJA). Interdisciplinary content was addressed, merging the teaching of robotics and sustainability through the use of materials that would be discarded. The study was applied in a multigrade EJA class in the countryside of Rio Grande do Sul. The methodological strategy adopted consisted of a bibliographic research, logbooks, and a qualitative approach. The students were immersed in an experience of awareness and development of competencies and skills related to sustainability and Industry 4.0. In this context, the proposal presented itself as viable and efficient, and compatible with the reality in which the students are inserted. It is worth emphasizing that the more this theme is disseminated, the more prepared the students will be for a future that will demand assertive solutions to socio-environmental problems. The process brought many learnings and findings, such as the sense of belonging, the urge to solve regional problems, and the fostering of critical thinking, which has the potential to extract and interpret the problems and, as a response, develop a viable, real, and low environmental impact solution. Among the results obtained we highlight autonomy, teamwork, problem solving, and self-management.
References
Batistela, F. (2021). A estratégia metacognitiva procedimental com influências do pensamento computacional: um estudo de caso. [Doctoral Tese, Universidade de Passo Fundo]. http://tede.upf.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/1196
Benitti, F. B. V., Urban, D. Ç., Kruenger, M. L., & Halma, A. (2009). Experimentação com Robótica Educativa no Ensino Médio: ambiente, atividades e resultados. In: Workshop de Informática na Escola (WIE), v. 15, 2009. Anais WIE. 2009. p. 1811-1820.
Bhat, S., Bhat, S., Raju, R., D'Souza, R., Binu K. G.(2020), “Collaborative Learning for Outcome Based Engineering Education: A Lean Thinking Approach”, 9th World Engineering Education Forum, WEEF 2019, Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 172, pp 927-936.
Bigolin, N.M., Silveira, S. R., Bertolini, C., Almeida, I. C. de, Geller, M., Parreira, F. J., Cunha, G. B. da, & Macedo, R. T. (2020). Metodologias ativas de aprendizagem: Um relato de experiência nas disciplinas de programação e estrutura de dados. Research, Society and Development, 9(1), e74911648. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i1.1648.
Bogdan, R.; Birklen, S. (1994), Investigação qualitativa em educação, Porto Editora, Porto, PT.
Carbonell, J. (2002).A aventura de inovar: a mudança na escola. Porto Alegre (RS): Artmed Editora.
Freire, P. (2011). Pedagogia do oprimido. Paz e terra.
Gil, A. C. (1999). Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. (5ª ed). Atlas.
Governo do Estado do Paraná. Guia Seed Lab - Braço robótico hidráulico. (2017). Disponível em: http://www.educadores.diaadia.pr.gov.br/arquivos/File/seed_lab/braco_robotico_guia_producao.pdf.
Izeki, C. A., Nagai, W. A., Seraphim, E. (2022). Os objetivos como elemento nuclear do currículo: concepções e práticas de docentes na disciplina de programação introdutória em uma universidade brasileira. Research, Society and Development. v. 11, n.6, e0111627947. http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i6.27947
Jacobi, P. R., Sinisgalli, P. (2012) Governança ambiental e economia verde. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva [online], v. 17, n. 6, p. 1469-1478.
Jacobi, P. R. (2014). Mudanças climáticas e ensino superior: a combinação entre pesquisa e educação. Educar em revista. [online]. p.57-72. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-4060.38107
Martins, H. H. T. de S. (2004). Metodologia qualitativa de pesquisa. Educação e pesquisa, 30(2), 289-300.https://www.scielo.br/pdf/ep/v30n2/v30n2a07.
Martinez, S. L., & Stager, G. S. (2019). Invent to Learn: Making, Tinkering and Engineering in the Classroom. Constructing Modern Knowledge Press.
Morais, C. G. B., Mendes Neto, F. M., & Osório, A. J. M. (2020). Dificuldades e desafios do processo de aprendizagem de algoritmos e programação no ensino superior: Uma revisão sistemática de literatura. Research, Society and Development, 9(10), e9429109287. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i10.9287
Ostrower, F. (1987). Criatividade. 6° edição- Petrópolis, Vozes.
Prasad, P.W., Alsadoon, A., Beg, A., & Chan, A. (2016). Using simulators for teaching computer organization and architecture. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 24.
Perrenoud, F. (2000). Dez novas competências para ensinar. Porto Alegre: Artmed.
Pinto, M. R. D. (1996). Escola e linguagens contemporâneas: um desafio. Rio de Janeiro: 1996.
Pirola, N.A. org. (2010). Ensino de ciências e matemática, IV: temas de investigação [online]. São Paulo: Editora UNESP; São Paulo: Cultura Acadêmica. 244 p. ISBN 978-85-7983-081-5.
PNUD – Programa das nações unidas para o desenvolvimento. (2005).
Santos, L. G. Educação, Tecnologias e Inovação Pedagógica em busca do Interativismo Colaborativo. Revista FAEEBA.v. 30, n. 64, p. 226-240, out./dez. 2021. https://www.revistas.uneb.br/index.php/faeeba/article/view/11741
Schneider, N. R. (2021). Construção do conhecimento em EAD: desafios e possibilidades para professor tutor. Revista Praxis, 1(2): 16-31.: https://doi.org/10.18264/eadf.v10i1799
Silva, M. A. (2017). Diploma ou conhecimento? rce –Revista Científica de Educação, 2(1):73-84. https://seer.facmais.edu.br/rc/index.php/RCE/article/view/25/19
Stein, M.I. (1974). Stimulating creativity. Group procedures. New York, Academic Press. v.2.
Sunthonkanokpong, W. (2010), “Future Global Visions of Engineering Education”, 2nd International Science, Social-Science, Engineering and Energy Conference 2010: Engineering Science and Management, Procedia Engineering Vol. 8, pp 160-164.
Tripp, D. (2005). Pesquisa-ação: umaintroduçãometodológica. Educação e Pesquisa,31(3), 443-466.
Veiga, J. E. da. Deplorável inércia. Ciência e Cultura, São Paulo , v. 71, n. 1, p. 27-33, jan.2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.21800/2317-66602019000100010
Ventura, J., & Bomfim, M.I. (2015). Formação de Professores e Educação de jovens e Adultos: O formal e o real nas Licenciaturas. Educação em Revista, v. 31, n. 2, p. 211-227 https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-4698127011.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). A formação social da mente. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Adriano Ineia; Priscila de Campos Velho; Nathani Eduarda de Andrades Feldens; Cleci T. Werner da Rosa; Ricardo Machado Ellensohn
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
