Intestinal microbiota and factors influencing poultry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i6.3098Keywords:
Antibiotics; Chicken; Microbiota and essential oils.Abstract
The poultry industry evolved and reached high production performance, with several zootechnical techniques that contributed to the current scenario, including ambience, genetics and diet - all contributing and optimizing the digestive system of the birds. The gastrointestinal tract is a system with several functions and attributions within the organism, among them, digestion of the host, immunity and proper functioning of the system. The gut microbiota has direct effects on metabolic processes and subsequently on the performance of birds. Issues related to microbiota have acquired relevance both for the maintenance and modulation of these microorganisms. One of the maneuvers used to manipulate the intestinal microflora was the use of antibiotics, acting as growth promoters; however, this type of additive, due to sanitary pressure, should be abolished in the coming years, which makes other options appear on the scene, among them, phytogenic additives. Among the latter, essential oils have gained prominence for their beneficial activity in the microbiota as well as their natural composition and non-residual impacts on the process. Based on this, the aim was to review the guidelines that affect the intestinal microbiota in poultry.
References
Aland, A., & Madec, F. (2009). Sustainable Animal Production Contents. Wageningen Academic Publishers.
Amato Neto, V., Levi, G. C., Lopes, H. V., Mendonca, J. S. de, & Baldy, J. L. da S. (2000). Antibioticos na pratica medica. Sao Paulo: Roca.
Amit-Romach, E., Sklan, D., & Uni, Z. (2004). Microflora ecology of the chicken intestine using 16S ribosomal DNA primers. Poultry Science, 83(7), 1093–1098. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.7.1093
Apajalahti, J., Kettunen, A., & Graham, H. (2004). Characteristics of the gastrointestinal microbial communities, with special reference to the chicken. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 60(2), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1079/wps200415
Biasato, I., Ferrocino, I., Grego, E., Dabbou, S., Gai, F., Gasco, L., Cocolin, L., Capucchio, M. T., & Schiavone, A. (2019). Gut microbiota and mucin composition in female broiler chickens fed diets including yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor, L.). Animals, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9050213
Bjerrum, L., Engberg, R. M., Leser, T. D., Jensen, B. B., Finster, K., & Pedersen, K. (2006). Microbial community composition of the ileum and cecum of broiler chickens as revealed by molecular and culture-based techniques. Poultry Science, 85(7), 1151–1164. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.7.1151
Celi, P., Cowieson, A. J., Fru-Nji, F., Steinert, R. E., Kluenter, A. M., & Verlhac, V. (2017). Gastrointestinal functionality in animal nutrition and health: New opportunities for sustainable animal production. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 234(September), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.09.012
Da Silva, W. T. M., Nunes, R. V., Pozza, P. C., Dos Santos Pozza, M. S., Appelt, M. D., & Eyng, C. (2011). Avaliação de inulina e probiótico para frangos de corte. Acta Scientiarum - Animal Sciences, 33(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v33i1.9979
Denbow DM (2000) Gastrointestinal anatomy and physiology. In: Whittow GC, editor. Avian Physiology. New York: Academic Press.
Fayol-Messaoudi, D., Berger, N. C., Coconnier-Polter, M.-H., Liévin-Le Moal, V., & Servin, A. L. (2005). pH-, Lactic Acid-, and Non-Lactic Acid-Dependent Activities of Probiotic Lactobacilli against. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71(10), 6008–6013. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.10.6008
Fernandes, R., Arruda, A., Oliveira, V., Queiroz, J., Melo, A., Dias, F., Marinho, J., Souza, R., Souza, A., & Santos Filho, C. (2015). Aditivos fitogênicos na alimentação de frangos de corte: óleos essenciais e especiarias. PubVet, 9(12), 526–535. https://doi.org/10.22256/pubvet.v9n12.526-535
Fujimura, K. E., Slusher, N. A., Cabana, M. D., & Lynch, S. V. (2010). Role of the gut microbiota in defining human health. Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy, 8(4), 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1586/eri.10.14
Gaskins, H. R., Collier, C. T., & Anderson, D. B. (2002). Antibiotics as growth promotants: Mode of action. Animal Biotechnology, 13(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1081/ABIO-120005768
Gerritsen, J. (2011). Intestinal microbiota in human health and disease: the impact of probiotics.
Gong, J., Forster, R. J., Yu, H., Chambers, J. R., Sabour, P. M., Wheatcroft, R., & Chen, S. (2002). Diversity and phylogenetic analysis of bacteria in the mucosa of chicken ceca and comparison with bacteria in the cecal lumen. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 208(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1097(01)00521-3
Gong, J., Si, W., Forster, R. J., Huang, R., Yu, H., Yin, Y., Yang, C., & Han, Y. (2007). 16S rRNA gene-based analysis of mucosa-associated bacterial community and phylogeny in the chicken gastrointestinal tracts: From crops to ceca. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 59(1), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00193.x
ITO, N. (1997). Fisiologia do Sistema Gostroentérico. Patologia do Sistema Gastroentérico. Editado por Elanco Saúde Animal, 9-52.
Jamroz, D. et al (2006). Influence of diet type on the inclusion of plant origin active substances on morphological and histochemical characteristics of the stomach and jejunum walls in chicken. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 90:255–268.
Guidotti, M., Prof, O., & Barcellos, M. (2011). Aditivos fitogênicos na alimentação de aves de produção.
K. C. Klasing. (1998). Nutritional Modulation of Resistance to Infectious Diseases. Poultry Science, 77, 1119–1125. https://doi.org/10.2528/PIERL12090710
Kalemba, D., Kunicka, A. (2003). Antibacterial and antifungal properties of essential oil components. Current Medicinal Chemistry, 1(3), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.1989.9697767
Lan, P. T. N., Hayashi, H., Sakamoto, M., & Benno, Y. (2002). Phylogenetic analysis of cecal microbiota in chicken by the use of 16S rDNA clone libraries. Microbiology and Immunology, 46(6), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1348-0421.2002.tb02709.x
Lu, J., Idris, U., Harmon, B., Hofacre, C., Maurer, J. ., & Lee, M. (2003). Revista peruana de epidemiología publicación de la Sociedad Peruana de Epidemiología. Revista Peruana de Epidemiología, 18(2), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.11.6816
Macari, M., Lunedo, R., Pedroso, A. (2014). Microbiota intestinal de aves. June.
Mappley, L. J., Tchórzewska, M. A., Cooley, W. A., Woodward, M. J., & La Ragione, R. M. (2011). Lactobacilli antagonize the growth, motility, and adherence of Brachyspira pilosicoli: A potential intervention against avian intestinal spirochetosis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 77(15), 5402–5411. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00185-11
Mehdi, Y., Létourneau-Montminy, M. P., Gaucher, M. Lou, Chorfi, Y., Suresh, G., Rouissi, T., Brar, S. K., Côté, C., Ramirez, A. A., & Godbout, S. (2018). Use of antibiotics in broiler production: Global impacts and alternatives. Animal Nutrition, 4(2), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2018.03.002
Oviedo-Rondón, E. O., Hume, M. E., Hernández, C., & Clemente-Hernández, S. (2006). Intestinal microbial ecology of broilers vaccinated and challenged with mixed Eimeria species, and supplemented with essential oil blends. Poultry Science, 85(5), 854–860. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.5.854
Pan, D., & Yu, Z. (2013). Intestinal microbiome of poultry and its interaction with host and diet. Gut Microbes, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.4161/gmic.26945
Pereira, A.S. et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. [e-book]. Santa Maria. Ed. UAB/NTE/UFSM. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/handle/1/15824/Lic_Computacao_Metodologia-Pesquisa-Cientifica.pdf?sequence=1. Acesso em: 20 março 2020.
Platel, K., & Srinivasan, K. (2004). Digestive stimulant action of spices: A myth or reality? Indian Journal of Medical Research, 119(5), 167–179.
Rinttilä, T., & Apajalahti, J. (2013). Intestinal microbiota and metabolites-Implications for broiler chicken health and performance. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 22(3), 647–658. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2013-00742
Shang, Y., Kumar, S., Oakley, B., & Kim, W. K. (2018). Chicken gut microbiota: Importance and detection technology. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 5(OCT). https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00254
Stanley, D., Geier, M. S., Denman, S. E., Haring, V. R., Crowley, T. M., Hughes, R. J., & Moore, R. J. (2013). Identification of chicken intestinal microbiota correlated with the efficiency of energy extraction from feed. Veterinary Microbiology, 164(1–2), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.01.030
Wise, M. G., & Siragusa, G. R. (2007). Quantitative analysis of the intestinal bacterial community in one- to three-week-old commercially reared broiler chickens fed conventional or antibiotic-free vegetable-based diets. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 102(4), 1138–1149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03153.x
Yadav, S., & Jha, R. (2019). Strategies to modulate the intestinal microbiota and their effects on nutrient utilization, performance, and health of poultry. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-018-0310-9
Yeoman, C. J., Chia, N., Jeraldo, P., Sipos, M., Goldenfeld, N. D., & White, B. A. (2012). The microbiome of the chicken gastrointestinal tract. Animal Health Research Reviews / Conference of Research Workers in Animal Diseases, 13(1), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466252312000138
Zhu N., Wang, J., Yu, L., Qiman Zhang, K. C. and B. L. (2019). Modulation of growth performance and intestinal microbiota in chickens fed plant extracts or virginiamycin. Frontiers in Microbiology, 10(JUN), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01333
Zhu, X. Y., Zhong, T., Pandya, Y., & Joerger, R. D. (2002). 16S rRNA-based analysis of microbiota from the cecum of broiler chickens. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68(1), 124–137. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.1.124-137.2002
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.