Structural Table for the Development of Gamification Strategies – STDGS: a proposed teaching-pedagogical resource for gamified learning solutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i9.31746Keywords:
Gamification; Game Elements; Teaching; Motivation; Engagement.Abstract
Gamification, a methodology based on the insertion of elements, mechanics, design and/or game narrative in other contexts, presents itself as an active methodology option capable of keeping the student motivated and engaged in their learning process. As few works about gamification assume the practical character of changing the methodological perspective from passive to active, it worries us to know how the teacher can develop a gamification strategy so that motivation and engagement favor the leading role by the students. To answer this question, this article presents the Structural Table for the Development of Gamification Strategies (STDGS) as a didactic-pedagogical resource that allows the teacher to organize and structure a methodological gamification strategy that combines game elements, motivation, engagement and models motivational learning. STDGS presents a structural plan and an organizational plan in order to establish the necessary relationships for a gamified methodological structure that does not focus only on entertainment and effectively favors the learning of students. From this perspective, we understand that it is a valuable resource for teachers who aim to develop gamification strategies, although it can be improved according to the teachers’ needs.
References
Alves, F. (2015). Gamification: como criar experiências de aprendizagem engajadoras. Um guia completo: do conceito a prática. 2. ed. São Paulo: DVS.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Boller, S. & Kapp, K. (2018). Jogar para aprender: tudo que você precisa saber sobre design de jogos de aprendizagem eficazes. São Paulo: DVS Editora.
Camargo, F. & Daros, T. (2018). A Sala de Aula Inovadora: Estratégias Pedagógicas para Fomentar o Aprendizado Ativo. Porto Alegre: Penso.
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and selfdetermination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychological Association, 55(1), 68-78.
Fiorentini, D., Garnica, A. V. M. & Bicudo, M. A. V. (2004). Pesquisa Qualitativa em Educação Matemática. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica.
Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59, 117–142.
Finn, J. D. (1993). School engagement and students at risk. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Fraga, V. M., Moreira, M. C. do A. & Pereira, M. V. (2021). Uma proposta de gamificação do processo avaliativo no ensino de física em um curso de licenciatura. Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física, 38(1), 174-192.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C. & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
Guimarães, S. E. R. & Bzuneck, J. A. (2002). Propriedades psicométricas de uma medida de avaliação da motivação intrínseca e extrínseca: um estudo exploratório. Psico-USF, 7(1), 1-8.
Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
Keller, J. M. (1984). The use of the ARCS model of motivation in teacher training. In Trott, K. S. A. J. (Ed.). Aspects of educational technology volume XVII: Staff development and career updating. London: Kogan Page.
Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: the ARCS model approach. New York: Springer.
Lima, L. A., Sousa, F. J. F. de, Mistura, C., Martins, S. N., & Del Pino, J. C. (2022). Gamificação e o processo de ensino: questões propostas ao ensino de Matemática. Research, Society and Development, 11(1), e7811124613. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i1.24613
Madeira, C. A. & Serrano, P. H. (2020). Games e gamificação na educação: alternativas para aumentar o sucesso das soluções. Revista Tecnologias na Educação, 33(21), 1-21.
Malone, T. W. (1981). Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Instruction. Cognitive Science, 5(4), 333-370.
Massário, M. S., Barreto, C. H. da C., Knoll, G. F., & Ghisleni, T. S. (2019). Gamificação como prática de ensino. Research, Society and Development, 8(7), e12871109. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v8i7.1109
Mattar, J. (2017). Metodologias Ativas: para a educação presencial, blended e a distância. São Paulo: Artesanato Educacional.
Mattar, J. (2018). Gamificação em educação: revisão de literatura. In Santaella, L., Nesteriuk, S. & Fava, F. (Org). Gamificação em Debate. São Paulo: Blucher.
Mcgonigal, J. (2012). A realidade em jogo. Rio de Janeiro: BestSeller.
Moran, J. (2015). Mudando a educação com metodologias ativas. In:Souza, C. A. de & Morales, O. E. T. (Org.). Convergências Midiáticas, Educação e Cidadania: aproximações jovens. (pp.15-33). Ponta Grossa: UEPG/PROEX.
Moran, J. (2018). Metodologias ativas para uma aprendizagem mais profunda. In Bacich, L. & Moran, J. (Org). Metodologias Ativas para uma educação inovadora: uma abordagem teórico-prática. Porto Alegre: Penso.
Rodrigues, D. G., Behrens, M. A., Saheb, D. & Araújo, N. C. R. (2022). Metodologias ativas a partir de uma visão inovadora. Research, Society and Development, 11(6), e11611628939. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i6.28939
Ryan, R. M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality, 63(3), 397-427.
Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness. San Francisco: Freeman.
Skinner, B. F. (2003). Ciência e comportamento humano. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
Skinner, E. A. & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effect of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581.
Tapia, J. A. & Fita, E. C. (2012). A motivação em sala de aula: o que é, como se faz. São Paulo: Edições Loyola.
Werbach, K. & Hunter, D. (2012). For The Win: How Game Thinking Can Revolutionize Your Business. Filadélfia: Wharton Digital Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: an overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3–17.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Vinicius Munhoz Fraga; Eduardo dos Santos de Oliveira Braga; Caio Marlon da Silva de Almeida; Taís Pereira da Fonseca; Marcus Vinicius Pereira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
