Comparison between removable complete prosthesis made by conventional and digital methods: systematic review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i12.34516Keywords:
Complete denture; Dental technology; Computer aided design; CADCAM.Abstract
The objective was to compare the performance of removable complete dentures made by the digital technological method with those made by conventional techniques, through a systematic review. A search was carried out in the VHL, Medline/PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases, from 1991 to January 2022, supplemented by manual search. Studies with edentulous patients, who had complete removable dentures made by the digital and analog method and who had at least one of the primary outcomes (degree of satisfaction, quality of denture finish and clinical performance of the dentures) were included. The initial search resulted in 914 articles, of which only 6 studies were considered eligible for the present search. These studies reported a total of 400 complete dentures installed in 193 patients, 160 of whom had conventional dentures and 240 had digital dentures. The age of the participants ranged from 58 to 69 years, with an average follow-up time of 12 months. Regarding the performance of complete dentures, the digital complete denture presented greater advantages compared to the conventional one in relation to: the degree of patient satisfaction; to the average time of execution of complete dentures, where an increase of 3,5 hours more for conventional totals; in terms of cost, being also higher for the manufacture of conventional prostheses. Therefore, it can be concluded that the studies suggest that the performance of the digital complete denture seems to be superior in terms of patient satisfaction, reduced number of clinical sessions and lower laboratory costs when compared to conventional prostheses.
References
Alhelal, A. et al. (2017). Comparação da retenção entre bases de próteses maxilares fresadas e convencionais: Um estudo clínico. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 117(2), 15-20.
Alhumaih, H. S. et al. (2018). Effects of denture adhesive on the retention of milled and heat-activated maxillary denture bases: A clinical study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Saudi Arabia, 120, 361-366.
Arakawa, L. et al. (2021). Resultados clínicos e custos de próteses totais convencionais e digitais em uma clínica universitária: um estudo retrospectivo. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2-6.
Barbosa, D. B. et al. (2006). Instalação de prótese total: uma revisão. Rev. Odontol. UNESP. São Paulo, 35(1),53-60.
Bilgin, M.S.; Baytaroglu, E.N.; Erdem, A. & Dilber, E. (2016). A review of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacture techniques for removable denture fabrication. Eur. J. Dent, 10, 286–291.
Brasil. (2021). Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovação e Insumos Estratégicos em Saúde. Departamento de Gestão e Incorporação de Tecnologias e Inovação em Saúde. Diretrizes metodológicas: elaboração de pareceres técnico-científicos [recurso eletrônico] / Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovação e Insumos Estratégicos em Saúde, Departamento de Gestão e Incorporação de Tecnologias e Inovação em Saúde. – Brasília: Ministério da Saúde.
Cunha, A, T .R. et al.(2013). A randomised trial on simplified and conventional methods for complete denture fabrication: Masticatory performance and ability. Journal of Dentistry, 41(2),133 – 142.
Davidowitz, G. & Kotick P. G. (2011). The use of CAD/CAM in dentistry. Dent. Clin. North. Am, 55, 559–570.
Drago, C. & Borgert, A. J. (2019). Comparação de visitas de ajuste pós-inserção não agendadas para próteses totais fabricadas com protocolos convencionais e CAD-CAM: Um estudo clínico. JPD. USA, 1-8.Gomes, A. C. et al. (2014). Reabilitação bucal com prótese total imediata. Full Det. Sci, 5(20), 590-594.
Goel, K. et al. (2016). Impact of Different Prosthodontic Treatment Modalities on Nutritional Parameters of Elderly Patients. Journal of Prosthodontics, 25(1),21-7.
Gomes, A. C. et al. (2014). Reabilitação bucal com prótese total imediata. Full Det. Sci, 5(20),590-594.
Higgins, J. & Thomas, J. et al. (2022). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. London, 6(3), 12-15
Kattadiyil, M. T. et al. (2015). Comparison of treatment outcomes in digital and conventional complete removable dental prosthesis fabrications in a predoctoral setting. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Califórnia, 114(6), 818-238.
Moraes, L N. O. & Cunha, M. A. P. (2021). Prótese total removível confeccionada em impressora 3D: Revisão de Literatura. Id online.Rev. Mult. Psic, 15(56), 319-331.
Nassani, M. Z. et al. (2021). A Survey of Dentists' Perception of Chair-Side CAD/CAM Technology. Healthcare (Basel), 9(1),68.
Page, M. J.; Mother, D; Bossuyt, P. M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T. C.; Mulrow, C.D. et al. (2021) PRISMA 2020 - explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372 (160), 145-155
Patil, M.; Kambale, S.; Patil A. & Mujawar K. (2018). Digitalization in dentistry: CAD/CAM—A review. Acta. Sci. Dent.Sci,(2),12–16.
Saponaro, P. C. et al. (2016). Desempenho clínico de próteses totais fabricadas por CAD/CAM: um estudo transversal. JPD, 1-5.
Srinivasan, M. et al. (2018). Próteses totais removíveis fresadas CAD/CAM: estudo de estimativa de tempo e custo. Journal of Dentistry, 80, 75-79.
Steinmassl, P. A. et al. (2017). Do CAD/CAM dentures really release less monomer than conventional dentures? Clin. Oral Investig, 21(5),1697–1705.
Wells, G. A. et al (2019). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Vandré Taumaturgo de Mesquita; Iale Ferreira de Godoy; Bruna Farias de Carvalho Vajgel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
