Family and COVID-19: alternative and complementary ways of caring
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i4.41233Keywords:
Coronavirus; Teas, medicinal; Spirituality.Abstract
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has been responsible for impacts in various areas globally, considered a public health emergency. It was observed that several changes were made in relation to health care, in the family and hospital context, with the aim of preventing or treating the disease. Objective: To analyze the alternative resources used to allopathy and describe the use of alternative and complementary forms of care in the fight against COVID-19. Methodology: This is a qualitative, descriptive and analytical study, through semi-structured interviews carried out in São Luís-MA, with individuals whose family member evolved to death from COVID-19 diagnosed through a positive result. Results: two categories were organized, namely: the use of medicinal plants and the search for the sacred. Although there are medications aimed at symptoms, the population also sought to use alternative treatments to obtain symptomatic relief and/or cure the disease. The most used product was tea, predominantly those rich in vitamin C, which can be prepared in different ways. Regarding sympathies, the study demonstrated that spirituality, as well as religiosity, were fundamental for the population, as they served as support and comfort for patients and also for their families. Conclusion: The search for and subsequent use of alternative and complementary ways of caring, either preventively or aiming at symptom relief and cure, has been an important additional mechanism for the population to be able to go through the pandemic period.
References
Abreu, L. D. P. S., & Martinazzo, A. P. (2021). A busca pelo uso de produtos naturais na prevenção de infecção por COVID-19. Brazilian Journal of Development, 7(4), 41613-41650.
Braga, J. C. B., & da Silva, L. R. (2021). Consumo de plantas medicinais e fitoterápicos no Brasil: perfil de consumidores e sua relação com a pandemia de COVID-19. Brazilian Journal of Health Review, 4(1).
Brasil. (2021). Boletim epidemiológico coronavírus N52. 2021. Disponível em: Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Boletim epidemiológico coronavírus N52. 2021. https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/media/pdf/2021/marco/05/boletim_epidemiologico_COVID_52_final2.pdf. Acesso em 05 de outubro de 2021.
Franco, J. V. V., de Oliveira, L. C. L., Dias, D. V. R., Azeredo, J. P. S., & Fonseca, J. B. (2022). Uma revisão sobre o uso das plantas medicinais no tratamento e prevenção da COVID-19. Research, Society and Development, 11(8), e4711830658-e4711830658.
Gadelha, C. S., Junior, V. M. P., Bezerra, K. K. S., Pereira, B. B. M., & Maracajá, P. B. (2013). Estudo bibliográfico sobre o uso das plantas medicinais e fitoterápicos no Brasil. Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável, 8(5), 27.
Holford, P., Carr, A. C., Jovic, T. H., Ali, S. R., Whitaker, I. S., Marik, P. E., & Smith, A. D. (2020). Vitamin C—An adjunctive therapy for respiratory infection, sepsis and COVID-19. Nutrients, 12(12), 3760.
Ladim, J. D. S. P., Jorge, M. M., dos Santos Souza, M. C., & da Silva Borges, M. (2022). Perspectivas da espiritualidade e da religiosidade no enfrentamento da pandemia por COVID-19. Revista de Enfermagem da UFJF, 8(1).
Minayo, M. C. S. (2014). O desafio do conhecimento: pesquisa qualitativa em saúde. (14a ed.). Hucitec.
Moscovici, S. (2009). Representações sociais: investigações em psicologia social. (6a ed.). Vozes.
Organização Mundial de Saúde. (2022, 12 de julho). WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. Retirado de: https://COVID19.who.int/
Porreca, W. (2020). Espiritualidade/religiosidade: possíveis companhias nos desafios pandêmico-COVID-19. Caderno de Administração, 28, 141-146.
Rocha, F. A. G., Araújo, M. F. F., Costa, N. D. L., & Silva, R. P. (2015). O uso terapêutico da flora na história mundial. Holos, 1, 49-61.
Rocha, LPB, de Oliveira Alves, JV, da Silva Aguiar, IF, da Silva, FH, da Silva, RL, de Arruda, LG, ... & da Silva, MV (2021). Uso de plantas medicinais: Histórico e. Pesquisa, Sociedade e Desenvolvimento, 10 (10), e44101018282-e44101018282.
Rossato, L., Ribeiro, B. M. D. S. S., & Scorsolini-Comin, F. (2022). Religiosidade/espiritualidade e saúde na pandemia de COVID-19. Revista do NUFEN: Phenomenology and Interdisciplinarity, 14(2).
Scorsolini-Comin, F., Rossato, L., da Cunha, V. F., Correia-Zanini, M. R. G., & Pillon, S. C. (2020). A religiosidade/espiritualidade como recurso no enfrentamento da COVID-19. Revista de Enfermagem do Centro-Oeste Mineiro, 10.
Tavares, C. Q. (2020). Dimensões do cuidado na perspectiva da espiritualidade durante a pandemia pelo novo coronavírus (COVID-19)/Dimensions of care from the perspective of spirituality during the new coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19)/Dimensiones de lo cuidado... Journal Health NPEPS, 5(1), 1-4.
Teixeira, A. H., Bezerra, M. M., Chaves, H. V., do Val, D. R., Pereira Filho, S. M., & Rodrigues, A. A. (2014). Conhecimento popular sobre o uso de plantas medicinais no município de Sobral-Ceará, Brasil. SANARE-Revista de Políticas Públicas, 13(1).
Vinuto, J. (2014). A amostragem em bola de neve na pesquisa qualitativa: um debate em aberto. Temáticas, 22(44), 203-220.
Wiersinga, W. J., Rhodes, A., Cheng, A. C., Peacock, S. J., & Prescott, H. C. (2020). Pathophysiology, transmission, diagnosis, and treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a review. Jama, 324(8), 782-793.
Xia, Y., Huang, F., Chen, H., Wang, N., Du, X., Chen, W., ... & Zhao, Y. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on tuberculosis patients’ behavior of seeking medical care—China, 2020. China CDC Weekly, 3(26), 553.
Mota, J. L., Pilger, C., de Lima, L. F., da Silva, D. S., de Andrade Vieira, F., & Carneiro, M. A. C. (2020). Espiritualidade e religiosidade como estratégias de resiliência utilizadas por idosos durante a pandemia de covid-19. Anais do Seminário Regional de Extensão Universitária da Região Centro-Oeste (SEREX)(ISSN 2764-1570), (4), 64-64.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Camila Angelo Vidal de Figueiredo; Cristina Maria Douat Loyola; Neemias Costa Duarte Neto; Déborah Adriane Pinheiro Trindade; Tarcízio Santos Murta Filho; Ana Letícia de Souza e Souza; Anny Karoline da Silva Pereira; Klara Katarina Rodrigues Rocha; Melissa Clementino Sousa; Marcos Antônio Barbosa Pacheco
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.