Physiological and biometric evaluations of lettuce grown in an aquaponic system under different conditions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i7.42563

Keywords:

Aquaponic lettuce; Physiological lettuce variables; Nutritional analyses of lettuce; Oreochromis niloticus; Lactuca sativa; Cerrado aquaponic cultivation.

Abstract

Producing food in a practical, sustainable and inclusive way are some of the advantages that the aquaponic system, which provides, however, studies on productive performance in the Brazilian Midwest are scarce. Thus, the present study aimed to analyze the physiological and nutritional characteristics of lettuce grown in aquaponics. For this, an experiment was carried out in the units of the Department of Irrigation and Drainage of IF Goiano, Rio Verde/Goiás Campus, consisting of reservoir (1 m3), decanter, biological filter, pump and aerator, in addition to six hydroponic gutters in each experimental unit, which housed 11 plants/trough. The experimental design was completely randomized, in a factorial arrangement with three fish populations (PP30=30, PP60=60 and PP90=90 fish w/m³) and two volumes of filter material (VF40=40 and VF60=60), for the first cycle and (VF50=50 and VF70=70 liters of expanded clay), for the second cycle, with three replications. Physiological analyses and biometric variables were analyzed at 45 after sowing. The data obtained were submitted to variance analysis and, when necessary, the means were compared by the Tukey Test, using the SISVAR® computer program. Due to what was analyzed, we can say that the highest values achieved for physiological parameters were for a volume of filter material of 70 L. In relation to the fish population, we observed that a population of 30 fish, presented satisfactory results. Biometric parameters, the highest means were achieved with a lower volume of filter material for a population of 30 fish. For macronutrients, the highest values were achieved with a higher volume of filter material for a population of 30 fish. For micronutrients, it was observed that a population of 30 fish is sufficient to ensure a good development of lettuces, with a biofilter with a minimum capacity of 50 liters. Significant variations in macro and micronutrients were observed, supposedly because they were discarded along with excess residues taken from decanters or because they suffered precipitation due to high pH values. The use of a biofilter with greater capacity is important to maintain adequate water quality levels, whether by reducing pH or ammonia.

References

Blat, S. F., Branco, R. B. F. & Trani, P. E. (2011). Desempenho de alface crespa em Ribeirão Preto, SP, no cultivo de primavera. Pesquisa & Tecnologia, 8 (105), 1-9.

Braz Filho, M. D. S. P. (2000). Qualidade na produção de peixes em sistema de recirculação de água. Centro Universitário Nove de Julho, São Paulo (SP), 41.

Carrijo, A., O. & Makishima. (2000). Princípios de nutrição mineral,formulação e manejo da solução nutritiva. In: Carrijo, A.O., Makishima, M. (Ed). Princípios de hidroponia. Brasília: Embrapa Hortaliças, (circular técnica 22).

Dalsgaard, J., Lund, I., Thorarinsdottir, R., Drenstig, A., Arvonen, K., & Pedersen, P., B. (2013). Farming diferente species in RAS in nordic countries: current status and future perspectives. Aquacultural Engineering, 53, 2-13.

Ebeling, J. M. (2006) Engineering analysis of stoichiometry of photoautotrophic, autotrophic and heterotrophic control of ammonia-nitrogen in aquaculture production system. Aquaculture, 257, 346-358.

Endut, A., Jusoh, A., Ali, N., Nik, W. B. W., & Hassan, A. (2010) A study on the optimal hydraulic loading rate and plant ratios in recirculation aquaponic system. Bioresource Tecnology 101, 1511-1517.

Ferreira, R., A. (2018) Aprimoramento da compostagem do resíduos de podas e jardins por meio de técnicas de baixo custo. Dissertação, 56 f. PPGAO, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica, RJ.

Guerra, A. M. N. M., Costa, A. C. M., & Tavares, P. R. F. (2017) Atividade fotossintética e produtividade de alface cultivada sob sombreamento. Revista Agropecuária Técnica. Areia-PB, 38, 125-132.

Goddek, S., Joyce, A., Kotzen, B., & Burnell, G. M. (2019). Aquaponics food Production’s systems. Springer, Switzerland, 619.

Hager, J., Bright, L.A., Dusci, J., & Tidwell, J. (2021) Aquaponics production manual – A practical handbook for growers.Kentucky State University, 1, 76.

Henz, G. P., & Suinaga, F. A. (2009). Tipos de alface cultivadas no Brasil. Brasília, DF: Embrapa Hortaliças.

Konig, B., JungeE, R., Bittzanski, A., Villarroel, M., & Komives, T. (2016) On the sustainability of aquaponics.Ecocycles Science Journal Europe Ecocycles 1, 26-32.

Lennard, W.A., & Leonard, B. V. (2006). A comparison of threedifferent hydroponic subsystems (gravel bed, floating and nutriente film tecnique) in a aquaponic test system. Aquaculture International,14, 539-550.

Martins, T. S. (2021). Desempenho agronômico de cultivares de alface em sistema hidropônico no município de Uruçuí-PI. Monografia (Graduação em Agronomia), IFPiauí-Campus Uruçuí - Uruçuí-PI.

Mendes, F. T. deC., Freitas, A. S.de, Alcantra, E., Marques, R. F. de P. V., Oliveira, A. S. de, Barbosa, R. A., Padua, M. C.de, & Junqueira, R. R. (2021). Desempenho agronômico de cultivares de alface em aquaponia. Research, Society and development. 10, 9.

Nick, C., & Borém, A. (2019) Alface: do plantio à colheita.Viçosa, MG: Editora UFV, 228.

Oliveira, E. Q. (2005) Cultivares de alface em segundo cultivo em sistemas solteiro e consorciado com duas variedades de cenoura. Caatinga, Mossoró, 18, 3,159-163.

Pereira A. S. et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. UFSM.

Pinho, S. M., David, L. H., Garcia, F., Keesman, K. J., Portella, M. C., & Goddek, S. (2021) South american fish species suitable for aquaponics: a review. Aquaculture international, 29,1427-1449.

Rakocy, J. E. (2004). Aquaponic production of tilápia and basil: comparing a batch and staggered cropping system. Acta Horticulture. 648, 63-69.

Rakocy, J., E. (2012). Aquaponics integrating fish and plant culture, Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 344-386.

Resh, H. M. (2012) Hydroponic Food Production. CRC Press, 560.

Sanchez-Moreira, A. M., & Reigosa, M. J. (2018) Advances in plants ecophysiology tecniques. Vigo, Spain.

Sediyama, M. A. N., Pedrosa, M. W., Salgado L. T., & Pereira, P. C. (2009) Desempenho de cultivares de alface para cultivo hidropônico no verão e no inverno. Científica, 37, 98-106.

Santos, F. N., Araujo, J. R. G., Costa, E. M. R. C., Costa, E. P. B. C., Silva, J. C. B., & Silva, J. R. (2005). Avaliação de cultivares de alface sob as condições de cultivo a ambiente protegido e à campo. Horticultura Brasileira, 23, 20, 1-4.

Silva, F. G., Dutra, W. F., Dutra, A. F., Oliveira, I. M., Filgueiras, L. M. B., & Mello, A. S.de. (2015). Trocas gasosas e fluorescência da clorofila em plantas de berinjela sob lâminas de irrigação.Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola Ambiental, 19,10, 946-952.

Soares, H. R., Silva E. F. de F., Silva, G. F., Pedrosa, E. M. R., Rolim, M. M., & Santos, A. N. (2015). Crescimento e consume hídrico de alface americana cultivada com águas salobras em Sistema hidropônico. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 19(7).

Somerville, C., Cohen, M., Pantanella, E., Stankus, A., & Lovatelli. (2014). A Small-scale aquaponic food production, integrating fish and plant farming. FAO, Rome.

Souza, S. V., Almeida, M. G.de, Oliveira, L. E.do N., & Sabbag, O. J. (2020). Análise do crescimento de alface sob diferentes sistemas de cultivo. Revista da Agricultura Familiar, 14, 2.

Summerfelt, R. C. (2000) Water quality considerations for aquaculture Aquaculture.

Taiz, L., & Zeiger, E. (2006) Fisiologia Vegetal, 6, Artmed.

Tyson, R. V., Simonni, E. H., Treadwell, D. D., White, J. M., & Simonne, A. (2008) Reconciling pH for ammonia biofiltration and cucumber yi in a recirculation aquaponic system with perlite biofilters. Hortscience 43, 719-724.

Vermeulen, T., & Kamstra, A. (2013). The need for systems design for robust aquaponics systems in the urban environment. Acta Horticulturae, 1004.

Published

30/07/2023

How to Cite

LORA, J. .; SANTOS, L. N. S. dos .; TEIXEIRA, M. B. .; VIDAL, V. M. .; MORAIS, W. A. .; SOARES, F. A. L. .; COSTA, A. C. . Physiological and biometric evaluations of lettuce grown in an aquaponic system under different conditions. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 12, n. 7, p. e16612742563, 2023. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v12i7.42563. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/42563. Acesso em: 22 dec. 2024.

Issue

Section

Agrarian and Biological Sciences