Epidemiological study of pediatric patients with signs and symptoms of intracranial hypertension with non-invasive cerebral compliance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i10.43481Keywords:
Intracranial hypertension; Intracranial pressure; Pediatrics.Abstract
Introduction: Intracranial hypertension (IH) is a clinical condition secondary to the loss of cerebral compensatory mechanisms. There are distinct methodologies used to diagnose IH and among them is the brain4care (b4c) sensor, which allows non-invasive monitoring of intracranial volume and pressure variations, intracranial compliance. Objective: To characterize the epidemiological profile of patients with suspected IH in the pediatric age range. Method: A cross-sectional study was carried out in a reference pediatric hospital in Brazil, with patients with signs and symptoms of IH monitored with the non-invasive B4C sensor. The patients underwent neurological evaluation and were submitted to exams - ophthalmological evaluation, lumbar puncture, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT). Result: 58 patients were evaluated, of whom 32 are female (55.2%) and 26 are male (44.8%); most patients presented symptoms such as drowsiness (81%), nausea (77.6%), headache (74.1%), vomiting (63.8%). The ophthalmoscopic examination 77.6% (n=58) of the patients did not show signs of papilledema. On CT and MRI, no changes were found in 84.5% (n=58) and 69.2% (n=26), respectively. Lumbar puncture showed changes in 57.1% (n=21). Considering the interpretation that would be made in adult patients, the b4c sensor monitoring (n=58) showed probable changes in the lying and sitting positions, respectively, in 46.3% and 38.9%. Conclusion: It was found that the b4c device can provide a possible complement of clinical information in the process of monitoring cerebral compliance.
References
Andrade, R. A. P., et al. (2021) A Nanometer Resolution Wearable Wireless Medical Device for Non-Invasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring, IEEE Sensors Journal. 21(20). 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3090648.
Aylward, S. C., & Way, A. L. (2018). Pediatric Intracranial Hypertension: a Current Literature Review. Current pain and headache reports, 22(2), 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-018-0665-9.
Ballestero, M. F. M., Frigieri, G., Cabella, B. C. T., de Oliveira, S. M., & de Oliveira, R. S. (2017). Prediction of intracranial hypertension through noninvasive intracranial pressure waveform analysis in pediatric hydrocephalus. Child's nervous system: ChNS: official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 33(9), 1517–1524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-017-3475-1.
Behrens, A., Lenfeldt, N., Ambarki, K., Malm, J., Eklund, A., & Koskinen, L. O. (2011). Intracranial pressure and pulsatility index. Neurosurgery, 69(4), E1033–E1034. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e31822999b7.
Carta, A., Favilla, S., Prato, M., Bianchi-Marzoli, S., Sadun, A. A., & Mora, P. (2012). Accuracy of funduscopy to identify true edema versus pseudoedema of the optic disc. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 53(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-8082.
Chen, B. S., Meyer, B. I., Saindane, A. M., Bruce, B. B., Newman, N. J., & Biousse, V. (2021). Prevalence of Incidentally Detected Signs of Intracranial Hypertension on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Their Association With Papilledema. JAMA neurology, 78(6), 718–725. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.0710.
De Bernardo, M., Vitiello, L., De Pascale, I., Capasso, L., Cornetta, P., & Rosa, N. (2022). Optic Nerve Ultrasound Evaluation in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Frontiers in medicine, 9, 845554. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.845554.
De Moraes, F. M., Rocha, E., Barros, F. C. D., Freitas, F. G. R., Miranda, M., Valiente, R. A., de Andrade, J. B. C., Neto, F. E. A. C., & Silva, G. S. (2022). Waveform Morphology as a Surrogate for ICP Monitoring: A Comparison Between an Invasive and a Noninvasive Method. Neurocritical care, 37(1), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-022-01477-4.
Folchini, C. M., Karuta, S. C. V., Ricieri, M. C., Motta, F. A., Manços, G. R., Frigieri, G., & Maeda, A. K. (2022). From disease to noninvasive intracranial monitoring. Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 80(5), 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2021-0298.
Giugno, K. M., Maia, T. R., Kunrath, C. L., & Bizzi, J. J. (2003) Tratamento da hipertensão intracraniana. J Pediatr. 79(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0021-75572003000400005.
Jeng, C. P. Avaliação da pressão intracraniana pelo ultrassom da bainha do nervo óptico em modelo animal de hipertensão intracraniana. Tese de Doutorado. Universidade de São Paulo. 2019.
Kazimierska, A., Kasprowicz, M., Czosnyka, M., Placek, M. M., Baledent, O., Smielewski, P., & Czosnyka, Z. (2021). Compliance of the cerebrospinal space: comparison of three methods. Acta neurochirurgica, 163(7), 1979–1989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04834-y
Moraes, F. M., & Silva, G. S. (2021). Noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring methods: a critical review. Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 79(5), 437–446. https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2020-0300.
Nazir, S., O'Brien, M., Qureshi, N. H., Slape, L., Green, T. J., & Phillips, P. H. (2009). Sensitivity of papilledema as a sign of shunt failure in children. Journal of AAPOS: the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 13(1), 63–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.08.003.
Pedersen, S. H., Lilja-Cyron, A., Astrand, R., & Juhler, M. (2020). Monitoring and Measurement of Intracranial Pressure in Pediatric Head Trauma. Frontiers in neurology, 10, 1376. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.01376.
Rabelo, N. N., da Silva Brito, J., da Silva, J. S., de Souza, N. B., Coelho, G., Brasil, S., & Frigieri, G. (2021). The historic evolution of intracranial pressure and cerebrospinal fluid pulse pressure concepts: Two centuries of challenges. Surgical neurology international, 12, 274. https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_53_2021.
Rosenberg, J. B., Shiloh, A. L., Savel, R. H., & Eisen, L. A. (2011). Non-invasive methods of estimating intracranial pressure. Neurocritical care, 15(3), 599–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-011-9545-4.
Sujata, N., Tobin, R., Tamhankar, A., Gautam, G., & Yatoo, A. H. (2019). A randomised trial to compare the increase in intracranial pressure as correlated with the optic nerve sheath diameter during propofol versus sevoflurane-maintained anesthesia in robot-assisted laparoscopic pelvic surgery. Journal of robotic surgery, 13(2), 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0849-7.
Tadevosyan, A., & Kornbluth, J. (2021). Brain Herniation and Intracranial Hypertension. Neurologic clinics, 39(2), 293–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncl.2021.02.005.
Tavakoli, S., Peitz, G., Ares, W., Hafeez, S., & Grandhi, R. (2017). Complications of invasive intracranial pressure monitoring devices in neurocritical care. Neurosurgical focus, 43(5), E6. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.8.FOCUS17450.
Vilela, G. H., Cabella, B., Mascarenhas, S., Czosnyka, M., Smielewski, P., Dias, C., Cardim, D. A., Mascarenhas, Y. M., Wang, C. C., Andrade, R., Tanaka, K., Lopes, L. S., & Colli, B. O. (2016). Validation of a New Minimally Invasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring Method by Direct Comparison with an Invasive Technique. Acta neurochirurgica. 122, 97–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22533-3_19.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Luana Say; Miqueias Moreira Correia; Caroline Mensor Folchini; Guilherme de Rosso Manços; Marinei Campos Ricieri; Fábio de Araújo Motta; Adriano Keijiro Maeda; Simone Carreiro Vieira Karuta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.