Content analysis in the inflection of the social context in Private Social Investment (PSI), Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Environmental Social and Governance (ESG)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i14.44379Keywords:
Private social investment; Corporate social responsibility; Environmental social governance.Abstract
When approaching the dynamism of a given social problem, there are several analysis techniques. The purpose of this article is to address the Content Analysis technique applied to the constructs presented. As a general objective, it sought to verify whether ISP, CSR and ESG are related and whether their inflections are proactive or defensive in the context of social innovation. Specifically, we sought to understand this inflection based on Content Analysis developed by Bardin. The Brundtland report indicated that poverty in Third World countries and high consumerism in First World countries represented the fundamental causes that prevented equal development in the world and, consequently, produced serious environmental and social crises. This thought caused changes in behavior in corporate society, where priorities began to be set in the context of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Private Social Investment (ISP) and, finally, the much talked about Environmental Social and Governance (ESG). It is concluded that the social dimension understood in this study assumes the concern with the unsatisfied demands of society, thus causing civil society to focus on improvements in certain locations based on their involvement in the processes of economic development and social, through cooperation between the actors involved and the formalization of social networks or partnerships. It is expected to contribute to clarifying the peculiarities of the issues raised and analyzed by this technique, thus demonstrating its peculiarities and responsibilities with regard to the so-called social innovation.
References
Abdo, H., Mangena, M., Needham, G., & Hunt, D. (2018). Disclosure of provisions for decommissioning costs in annual reports of oil and gas companies: A content analysis and stakeholder views. Accounting Forum, 42(4), 341-358.
Abdullah, M., Hamzah, N., Helmi, M., Tseng, M.-L., & Brander, M. (2019). The Southeast Asian haze: The quality of environmental disclosures and firm performance. Journal of Cleaner Production.
Akhtaruddin, M., Hossain, M. A., Hossain, M., & Yao, L. (2019). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure in corporate annual reports of Malaysian listed firms. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 7(1), 1.
Bardin, L. (2018). Análise de conteúdo. Edições 70, LDA, (5a ed.), Autores Associados.
Bernardes, R., Borini, F. & Figueiredo, P. N. (2020). Inovação em Organizações de Economias Emergentes. Cadernos EBAPE. BR. 17, 886-94.
Borini, F. M., Costa, S., Bezerra, M. A. & Oliveira Jr., M. M. (2014). Reverse innovation as an inducer of centres of excellence in foreign subsidiaries of emerging markets. International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets. 6 (2), 163-82.
Borini, F. M., Costa, S. & Oliveira Jr., M. D. M. (2016). Reverse innovation antecedents. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 11(2), 175-189.
Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268-295.
Cassiolato, J. E. & Lastres, H. M. M. (2000). Sistemas de inovação: políticas e perspectivas. Revista Parcerias Estratégicas, (8), 237-255.
Céfaï, D & Pasquier, D. (2013). Les sens du public. Paris. PUF. GRI – Global Reporting Initiative. Manual de Implementação. 2013. https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/Brazilian-Portuguese-G4-Part-wo.pdf.
Demajoravic, J. (2001). Sociedade de Risco e Responsabilidade Socioambiental: perspectivas para a educação corporativa. Edição Serviço Nacional do Comércio (Senac).
Drucker. P. F. (2017). The Theory of the Business. Harvard Business Review Classics.
Dye, R. A. (2001). Uma avaliação de “ensaios sobre divulgação” e a literatura sobre divulgação em contabilidade. Journal of Accouting and Economics, 32(1-3), 181-235.
Eugénio, T. (2011). Contabilidade Ambiental. Verlag Dashofer.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
Frederick, W. C. (1960). The growing concern over business responsibility. California Management Review, 2(4), 54-61
Garcia, E. A. R., Carvalho, G. M., Boaventura, J. M. G., & Souza, J. M., filho. (2021). Determinants of corporate social performance disclosure: A literature review. Social Responsibility Journal, 17(4), 445-468.
Glavas, A., & Piderit, S. K. (2012). How does doing good matter? Effects of corporate citizenship on employees. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 36: 51-70.
Govindarajan, V., & Trimble, C. (2012). Reverse innovation: create far from home, win everywhere. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.
Gray, R.H., Kouhy, R. & Lavers, S. (1995), “Constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies: a methodological note”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 78-101.
Global Reporting Initiative (2006). Diretrizes para relatório de sustentabilidade versão 3.0. GRI.
Guidry, R. E & Patten, D. (2010). Market reactions to the first-time issuance of corporate sustainability reports: Evidence that quality matters. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 1: 33-50.
Gumusluoglu, L. E., & Ilsev, A. (2009). Liderança transformacional, criatividade e inovação organizacional. Journal of Business Research, 62(4), 461-473.
Gupta, S. (2019). Understanding the feasibility and value of grassroots innovation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1-25.
Howaldt , J., & Schwarz, M. (2018). Social Innovation: Concepts, research fields and international trends. Trend Study of the International Monitoring Project (IMO).
Jia, X., Chen, J., Mei, L. & Wu, Q. (2018). Como a liderança importa na inovação organizacional: uma perspectiva de abertura. Revista Decisão da Administração, 56(1), 6-25.
Katz, J. (1986). Importación de tecnología, aprendizaje y industrialización dependiente. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Kolk, A. (2004). A decade of sustainability reporting: developments and significance International. Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 3(1): 51-63.
Lemos, C. (2000). Inovação na era do conhecimento. Revista Parcerias Estratégicas, (8), 157-179.
Lindblom, C. K. (1994). The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. In: Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference. New York.
Malerba, F. (2002). Sectorial systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31, 247-264.
McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988) Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31: 854-872.
Minayo, M. C. S. (2007). Pesquisa Social: teoria, método e criatividade. Ed. Vozes, 9-29.
Moraes, R. (1999). Análise de conteúdo. Revista Educação, 22(3), 7-32.
Nelson, R. R. (2004). The changing institutional requirements for technological and economy catch up. In: DRUID Summer Conference 2004 on Industrial dynamics, innovation, and development. Anais. Elsinore: DRUID, 1-15.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Pesquisa qualitativa e métodos de avaliação: Integrando teoria e prática. (4a ed.), Publicações SAGE, Inc.
Ponte, V. M. R., Albuquerque Filho, A. R., Sousa, A. L. C., Silveira Lopes, H. S., & Guimarães, D. B., (2019). Influência da Internacionalização e da Governança Corporativa na Responsabilidade Social Corporativa. Iberoamerican Journal of 4Strategic Management, 18(3), 397-419.
Santos, B. S. (2008). Um discurso sobre as Ciências na transição para uma ciência. Cortez.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1961). Capitalismo, socialismo e democracia. Fundo de Cultura.
Schumpeter, J. A. A (1985). Teoria do desenvolvimento econômico. Nova Cultural.
Shafique, I., Ahmad, B. & Kalyar Masood, N. (2019). Como a liderança ética influencia a criatividade e a inovação organizacional: examinando os mecanismos subjacentes. European Journal of Innovation Management, 23(1), 114-133.
Shankar, V., Narang, U. (2019). Emerging market innovations: Unique and differential drivers, practitioner implications, and research agenda. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, p. 1-23.
Silva, A. F. P., Araújo, R. A. M., & Santos, L. M. S. (2018). Relação da rentabilidade e o disclosure de provisões e passivos contingentes ambientais das empresas de alto potencial poluidor listadas na B3. Revista Catarinense da Ciência Contábil, 17(52), 101-118.
Triviños, A. N. S. (1987). Introdução à pesquisa em ciências sociais: a pesquisa qualitativa em educação. Atlas.
Veríssimo, C. (2010). Auditoria e Relatórios de Sustentabilidade. Comunicação apresentada no XIV Congresso de AECA.
Verrecchia, R. E. (2001). Essays on disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1-3), 97-180.
Von Zedtwitz, M. A. (2015). Typology of reverse innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(1), 12-28.
Zask, J. (2004). L’enquête sociale comme inter-objectivation. In : Karsenti, B. , QUÉRÉ, La Croyance et l’Enquête : Aux sources du pragmatisme. Paris. Ed. de l’EHESS.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Cristiano Melo Reinaldo; Francisco Roberto Pinto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
