Sustainable open innovation for ammunition waste management: Proposal for implementation in brazilian public security institutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v13i2.45053Keywords:
Open innovation; Innovation management; Sustainability; Ammunition cartridge; Organizational process; Public security; Reverse logistics.Abstract
The study describes how looking at collaborative processes with a sustainable bias can effectively contribute, through sustainable open innovation, to opportunities for solving challenges of the same context. Therefore, we present a study proposal to improve the public security arena (reverse logistics of ammunition expended in training), aiming at recycling the generated waste. The research strategy was case study analysis, which is appropriate for investigating real-life events. It was necessary to understand which factors contribute to qualifying the requirements for reverse logistics and sustainable innovation in public security institutions. The specific objective is to link the maturity level of the public security institutions to its goals in reverse logistics, to give greater view to implement it. As a result, we were able to increase the current status of knowledge regarding the sustainable disposal of expended ammunition cases and get a better understanding of the economic gains by selling the brass scraps waste (expended ammunition) as a large expected benefit, collaborating to reduce the customer’s costs by enhancing their reverse logistics processes. Also, considering the solutions to complex problems through collaboration, knowledge of purposes, and organizational maturity, point out the relationship between sustainability and innovation.
References
Adams, R., Jeanrenaud, S., Bessant, J., Denyer, D., & Overy, P. (2016). Sustainability‐oriented innovation: A systematic review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(2), 180-205.
Bamford, J. D. (2002) Mastering alliance strategy: a comprehensive guide to design, management, and organization. Ed. Jossey-Bass.
Barbieri, J. C., Vasconcelos, I. F. G. D., Andreassi, T., & Vasconcelos, F. C. D. (2010). Inovação e sustentabilidade: novos modelos e proposições. Revista de Administração de Empresas, São Paulo • 50(2), 146-154.
Bell, J. E., Mollenkopf, D. A., & Stolze, H. J. (2013). Natural resource scarcity and the closed‐loop supply chain: a resource‐advantage view. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 43, 351–379.
Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H., Moedas, C. (2018) Open innovation: research, practices, and policies. California Management Review, 60(2), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125617745
Brasil. Lei nº 6.938 (1981). Política Nacional do Meio Ambiente. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l6938.htm.
Brasil. Lei nº 12.305 (2010). Institui a Política Nacional de Resíduos Sólidos, altera a Lei nº 9.605, de 12 de fevereiro de 1998, e dá outras providências. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasília, 2010. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2007-2010/2010/Lei/L12305.htm . Acess in: 11 jan. 2023.
Brasil. Anuário da Segurança Pública (2022). São Paulo. https://forumseguranca.org.br/anuario-brasileiro-seguranca-publica/. Acess in: apr 2023.
Brennan, G., Tennant, M. & Blomsma, F. (2015). Chapter 10. Business and production solutions: Closing Loops & the Circular Economy, in Kopnina, H. and Shoreman-Ouimet, E. (Eds). Sustainability: Key Issues. Routledge: EarthScan, pp.219-239.
Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Techonology. Hardvard Business School Press.
Chesbrough, H, & Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating Open Innovation: Clarifying an Emerging Paradigm for Understanding Innovation. New Frontiers in Open Innovation, Oxford University Press, p. 17.
Chesbrough, H., Bogers, M., Strand, R., & Whalen, E. (2018). Sustainability through open innovation: Carlsberg and the green fiber bottle. In SAGE Business Cases. The Berkeley-Haas Case Series. University of California, Berkeley. Haas School of Business.
Chesbrough, H. & Brunswicker, S. (2013). Managing Open Innovation in Large Firm. Survey Report: Executive Survey on Open Innovation.
Couto, M. C. L. & Lange, L. C. (2017). Análise dos sistemas de logística reversa no Brasil. Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, 22, 889-898.
D'alvano, L., & Hidalgo, A. (2012) Innovation management techniques and development degree of innovation process in service organizations. R and D Management, 42(1).
Damacena, F. D. L. (2011). A proteção ambiental no âmbito da união européia the environmental protection in the framework of the european union. Revista Eletrônica Direito e Política, 6(1).
De Medeiros, J. F., & Ribeiro, J. L. D. (2017). Environmentally sustainable innovation: Expected attributes in the purchase of green products. Journal of cleaner production, 142, 240-248.
Del Carpio Gallegos, J. F. & Seclen-Luna, J. P. (2022). The effect of technological innovation on Low-Tech Peruvian Manufacturing Firms’ Performance: The role of external sources of knowledge. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración. 35(3), 366-379. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-08-2021-0164 .
Doloreux, D., Shearmur, R., & Rodriguez, M. (2018). Internal R&D and external information in knowledge-intensive business service innovation: complements, substitutes or independent? Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(6), 2255-2276. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2018.5694 .
Donaire, D. (1995). Gestão ambiental na empresa. Atlas, 134 p.
Eimers, J. (2019). Determining end of life policy for air force expended small arm cartridge cases. Graduate Research Paper (master’s degree) – Air University, Air Force Institute of Technology. Ohio. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1089582.pdf . Accessed: april 2023
Gil, A. C. (1999). Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. (5A ed.). Atlas.
Gomez, J., Salazar, I. & Vargas, P. (2016), Sources of information as determinants of product and process innovation. PloS ONE, 11(4).
Gonçalves-Dias, S. L. F., Labegalini, L., & Csillag, J. M. (2012). Sustentabilidade e cadeia de suprimentos: uma perspectiva comparada de publicações nacionais e internacionais. Produção, 22(3), 517-533.
Guedes, J. N. (2009) Diagnóstico e estudo de variabilidade espacial da contaminação por metais pesados em solos e águas superficiais de área de destruição de munição. Dissertação (Mestrado) –Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro.
Hazen, B. T., Hall, D. J., & Hanna, J. B. (2012). Reverse logistics disposition decision-making: Developing a decision framework via content analysis. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 42(3), 244–274.
Hazen, B. T., Hall, D. J., Overstreet, R., & Hanna, J. B. (2015). Antecedents to and outcomes of reverse logistics. Industrial Marcketing Management, 46, 160–170.
Krippendorff, K. (2009). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. (2a ed.), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Leite, P. R. (2009). Logística Reversa: Meio Ambiente e Competitividade. (2a ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
Moya-Fernández, P. J., & Seclen-Luna, J. P. (2023). Evaluating the Effects of Information Sources on Innovation Outcomes: Are There Differences between KIBS and Manufacturing Firms from a Latin America Country? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1-32.
National Research Council (2014). Force multiplying technologies for logistics support to military operations. The National Academies Press. Cap. 5 e 6.
Organização para a Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Econômico – OCDE, (2006). Manual de Oslo: diretrizes para coleta e interpretação de dados sobre inovação. Brasília: FINEP.
Nowell, B., & Albrecht, K. (2018). A reviewer’s guide to qualitative rigor. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Oxford, 29(2), 348-363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy052
Obradovic, T., Vlacic, B. & Dabic, M. (2021). Open innovation in the manufacturing industry: a review and research agenda. Technovation (102), 10221, DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102221.
Rezaei, S., & Behnamian, J. (2022). Competitive planning of partnership supply networks focusing on sustainable multi-agent transportation and virtual alliance: A matheuristic approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 333, 130073.
Rogers, D. S., & Tibben-Lembke, R. (2001). An examination of reverse logistics practices. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 129–148, https://doi.org/10.1002/J.2158-1592.2001.TB00007.X .
Rosemann, M., & De Bruin, T. (2012) Application of a Holistic Model for Determining BPM Maturity. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/27481630_Application_of_a_Holistic_Model_for_Determining_BPM_Maturity . Acessed in jan 2023.
Seclen-Luna, J. P., Moya-Fernández, P., & Pereira, Á. (2021). Exploring the effects of innovation strategies and size on manufacturing firms’ productivity and environmental impact. Sustainability, 13(6), 3289.
Schönborn, G., Berlin, C., Pinzone, M., Hanisch, C., Georgoulias, K. & Lanz, M. (2019). Why social sustainability counts: The impact of corporate social sustainability culture on financial success. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 17, 1-10.
Sorvari, J. (2018). Shotting ranges: Enviromental Contamination. Encyclopedia of Environmental Health, Elsevier.
Souza, M. T., Silva, M. D. & Carvalho, R. (2010). Revisão integrativa: o que é e como fazer. Einstein. 8(1), 102-6.
Stanko, M., Fisher, G., & Bogers, M. (2017) Under the Wide Umbrella of Open Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12392 .
Tarhan, A., Turetken, O., & Reijers, H. A. (2016) Business process maturity models: a systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 75, 122–134.
United Nations Environment Programme – UNEP. (2007). Life cycle management: a business guide to sustainability, Paris. http://www.unep.fr/shared/publications/cdrom/DTIx0889xPA/UNEP%20SETAC%20Life%20Cycle%20Initiative/LCM%20Guide/LCM%20guide.pdf . Acessed in: jan 2023.
Zito, A.R., Burns, C., & Lenschow, A. (Eds.). (2020). The Future of European Union Environmental Politics and Policy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003031178 .
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Neusa Rejane Pinheiro de Carvalho Haltenburg; Ana Clara Cândido
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
