21st century techniques for dental implants: Alternative to sinus lift for rehabilitation with short dental implants
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v13i5.45773Keywords:
Oral health; Implant dentistry; Short implants; Oral rehabilitation; Surgical technique for maxillary sinus augmentation.Abstract
Introduction: The absence of teeth can harm a person's self-esteem, which can result in low confidence, emotional distress and social anxiety. There is no doubt that dental implants are currently the most suitable solution to mitigate the problem of tooth loss. Objective: to present, through a literature review, what is the relationship between the clinical study of breast lifting and the installation of short implants as an alternative to this surgical technique, taking into account surgery time, post-operative period, success of the implants and prosthetic quality. Methodology: The selection criteria for the articles that made up this work followed the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Following the inclusion criteria, articles available in Portuguese, English and Spanish were selected, which discussed breast lifting techniques for the installation of long implants in relation to the installation of short implants without the need for bone grafts. Articles that were published between 2010 and 2020 were also considered. Final considerations: It was possible to observe that the present article presents strong points and eminences that suggest the use of short implants, even in areas of poor bone quality and for patients who, for some reason, This is why they cannot undergo complex oral surgical procedures.
.
References
Almeida, L. P. B.,Coelho, A. V. P.,Shinozaki, E. B.,Cunha, V. P. P. (2014). Estudo comparativo das técnicas cirúrgicas de levantamento de seio maxilar em implantodontia: revisão de literatura. 2011. 4 f. Tese (Doutorado) - Curso de Especialização em Implantodontia. Departamento de Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Vale do Paraíba. Vale do Paraíba, 2011. D
Bhat, S. V., Premkumar, P., & Shenoy, K. K. (2015). Stress Distribution Around Single Short Dental Implants: A Finite Element Study. J.IndianProsthodont. Soc.14, 161-167.
Berretta, M, Poli, P. P, Grossi, G B, Pieroni, S, & Maiorana, C. (2014). Long-term survival rate of implants placed in conjunction with 246 sinus floor elevation procedures: Results of a 15-year retrospective study. Journal of Dentistry. 41, 955-959.
Bragado, Novel M., Berini Aytés L., & Gay escoda C. (2010). Sinusite maxilar iatrogênica após colocaçãoImplantes: estudo de caso. (traduzido). Avances en periodoncia. 22(3), 135-145.
Camacho, F. M. T., Sakakura, C. E., Mera, M. F. M., Esteves, J. C., et al. Comparação entre os sistemas de Cone Morse e Hexágono Interno em prótese total fixa mandibular implantossuportada: estudo de um caso clínico. Revista Científica Multidisciplinar do Centro Universitário da Feb. 8(1), 327-338. 2012.
Cannizzaro, G, Felice, P, Leone, M, Ferri, V, Viola, P, & Esposito, M. (2012). Immediate versus early loading of 6.5 mm-long flaplessplaced single implants: a 4-year after loading report of a split-mouth randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 5(2), 111-121. 2012.
Cruz, R. S., Lemos, C. A. de A., Batista, V. E. de S., Oliveira, H. F. F. al. (2018). Implantes curtos versus implantes mais longoscom elevação do seio maxilar. Uma revisão sistemáticae metanálise. (traduzido). Braz. Oral Res. 32(86), 1-14. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30231176.
Demiralp, K. O., Kursun, S., Akbulut, N., & Argun, D. (2015). Survival rate of short, locking taper implants with a plateau design: a 5-year retrospective study. BioMed research international.15 (20), 197.
Esposito, M., Felice, P., & Worthington, H. V. (2015) Evidência de insuficiencia para elevações sinusais em relação a implantes curtos para reabilitação de implantes dentários.(2023). (traduzido). Evidence-Based Dentistry, 16. 21-22.
Fan, Tengfei, L. I., Yicun, D., Wei-Wei, W., & Tianfu, Z. W. (2016). Implantes curtos (5 a 8 mm) versus mais longosImplantes (> 8 mm) com elevação sinusalMaxila Atrófica Posterior: Uma Meta-Análisede ECRs. (traduzido). Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research.
Felice, P, Pistilli, R, Piattelli, M, Soardi, E, Corvino, V, & Esposito, M. (2012). Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5x5 mm implants with a novel nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implantsin augmented bone. Preliminary results from a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 5. 149-161.
Galvão, F. F. de S. A., Almeida-Junior, A. A. de., Faria- Júnior, N. B. deet al. (2011). Previsibilidade de implantes curtos: revisão de literatura. Revista Sul-Brasileira de Odontologia. 8(1).
Garcia, C. Fagundes, A., Rafael Ciota, G., Fernando V. et al. Intercorrência com implantes em seio maxilar: relato de caso. (2017). (traduzido). Rev. Odontol. Bras Central. 26(79), 77-81. 2017.
Mokcheh, A., Jegham, H., & Turki. S. Implantes curtos como alternativa ao levantamento sinusal para a reabilitação de atrofias posteriores superiores: revisão sistemática e metanálise. (2019). (traduzido).J Stomatol Oral MaxillofacSurg. 120, 28–37.
Praça, F. S. G. Metodologia da pesquisa científica: organização estrutural e os desafios para redigir o trabalho de conclusão. (2015). Revista Eletrônica “Diálogos Acadêmicos”, 1, 72-77.
Rodrigues, Cíntia Alves Vitor. Técnica cirúrgica para elevação do assoalho do seio maxilar: uma revisão da literatura. 2015. 85f. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Odontologia)- Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, 2015. https://repositorio.ufsc.br/bitstream/handle/123456789/133502/TCC%20CISSI.pdf?sequence=1.
Rossi, Fabio, Lang, Niklaus P., Ricci, E. et al. (2020). Carregamento antecipado de implantes de 6 mm de comprimentocom uma superfície moderadamente rugosa de coroas simples de suporte: umestudo prospectivo de coorte de 5 anos. (traduzido). Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 1–7.
Srinivasan, M., Vazquez Lydia, R. P. et al. (2014). Survival rates of short (6 mm) micro-rough surface implants: a review of literature and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implant Res. 25(5), 539-545.
Taschieri, S., Corbella, S, Molinari, et al. Short Implants in Maxillary and Mandibular Rehabilitations: Interim Results (6 to 42 Months) of a Prospective Study (2015). JournalOf Oral Implantology.41(1), 50-55.
Thoma, D. S., Zeltner, M., Hüsler, J., et al. (2015) Implantes curtos versus levantamento sinusal com implantes mais longos para restaurar a maxila posterior: uma revisão sistemática. (traduzido). Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 26 (11), 154–169.
Zhang, Xiao-Meng Zhang, Shi, Jun-YuShi, Gu, Ying-Xin (2016). Investigação clínica e satisfação do paciente de Implantes curtos versus implantes mais longos comElevação do assoalho do seio osteossomo em atróficosMaxilas posteriores: um estudo piloto randomizado. (traduzido). Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Alexandre Henrique Moura de Oliveira ; Dayane Carla dos Santos Nogueira; Denise Nascimento Silva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
