Pain assessment in patients in intensive care: An integrative review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v14i1.47985Keywords:
Pain assessment; Intensive Care; Pain.Abstract
Introduction: Pain assessment is closely related to significant outcomes in patients under intensive care; however, its measurement remains challenging, particularly in non-communicative patients such as those who are sedated, intubated, or on mechanical ventilation. It is known that absent or incorrect pain assessment can lead to physiological and psychological complications, increasing morbidity and mortality in Intensive Care Units (ICUs). Furthermore, it is essential to highlight the importance of the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) and the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) as behavioral pain assessment tools for non-communicative and sedated patients in ICUs. Additionally, the emergence of new tools for pain assessment must be noted. Objectives: This integrative review aimed to identify and synthesize qualitative and quantitative evidence regarding pain assessment in patients under intensive care. Methods: A comprehensive search of three electronic databases (Medline, PubMed, and Scopus) was conducted to analyze pain assessment in patients under intensive care. Two authors were involved in selecting studies based on the PRISMA protocol guidelines. Results: From the initial search yield of 2,802 studies, 12 studies were included in the analysis. Conclusion: Regular assessment of pain intensity leads to better outcomes and an improved quality of life for patients in the ICU.
References
Alotni, M., Guilhermino, M., Duff, J., & Sim, J. (2022). Barriers to nurse-led pain management for adult patients in intensive care units: an integrative review. Australian Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2022.09.002
Baamer, R. M., Iqbal, A., Lobo, D. N., Knaggs, R. D., Levy, N. A., & Toh, L. S. (2022). Utility of unidimensional and functional pain assessment tools in adult postoperative patients: a systematic review. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 128(5), 874–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2021.11.032
Baroni, D. A., Abreu, L. G., Paiva, S. M., & Costa, L. R. (2022). Comparison between Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) and self-reported measures for diagnosing pain in conscious individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 6993. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06993-z
Berger, S., & Baria, A. T. (2022). Assessing pain research: A narrative review of emerging pain methods, their technosocial implications, and opportunities for multidisciplinary approaches. Frontiers in Pain Research, 3(2), 896276. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2022.896276
Chanques, G., Pohlman, A., Kress, J. P., Molinari, N., De Jong, A., Jaber, S., & Hall, J. B. (2014). Psychometric comparison of three behavioural scales for the assessment of pain in critically ill patients unable to self-report. Critical Care, 18(5), R160. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc14000
Desantana, J. M., Perissinotti, D. M. N., Oliveira Junior, J. O., Correia, L. M. F., Oliveira, C. M., & Fonseca, P. R. B. (2020). Definition of pain revised after four decades. Brazilian Journal of Pain, 3(3), 197–198. https://doi.org/10.5935/2595-0118.20200191
Dydyk, A. M., & Grandhe, S. (2022). Pain Assessment. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556098/
Erden, S., Artiklar, T., Tura, I., & Türkmen, A. (2022). Assessment of procedural pain in patients with COVID-19 in the intensive care unit. Pain Management Nursing, 23(5), 596–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2022.03.002
Eriksen, M. B., & Frandsen, T. F. (2018). The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: a systematic review. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(4), 420–431.
Gordon-Williams, R., Trigo, A., Bassett, P., Williams, A., Cone, S., Lees, M., & Brandner, B. (2021). An interactive pain application (MServ) improves postoperative pain management. Pain Research and Management. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8898170
International Association for the Study of Pain. (1986). Pain, 3(Suppl.), 1–225.
Kotfis, K., Zegan-Barańska, M., Szydłowski, Ł., Śukowski, M., & Ely, E. W. (2017). Methods of pain assessment in adult intensive care unit patients - Polish version of the CPOT (Critical Care Pain Observation Tool) and BPS (Behavioral Pain Scale). Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy, 49(1), 66–72.
Kobayashi, N., Shiga, T., Ikumi, S., Watanabe, K., Murakami, H., & Yamauchi, M. (2021). Semi-automated tracking of pain in critical care patients using artificial intelligence: a retrospective observational study. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 84714. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84714-8
Lee, H. J., Cho, Y., Joo, H., Jeon, J. Y., Jang, Y. E., & Kim, J. T. (2021). Comparative study of verbal rating scale and numerical rating scale to assess postoperative pain intensity in the post anesthesia care unit. Medicine, 100(6). https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000024314
Morete, M. C., Mofatto, S. C., Pereira, C. A., Silva, A. P., & Odierna, M. T. (2014). Translation and cultural adaptation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Behavioral Pain Scale. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, 26(4), 373–378. https://doi.org/10.5935/0103-507x.20140057
Nascimento, J. C. C. D., & Silva, L. C. S. (2014). Avaliação da dor em pacientes sob cuidados em Unidades de Terapia Intensiva: uma revisão de literatura. Revista Movimenta, 7(2).
Nyhagen, R., Egerod, I., Rustøen, T., Lerdal, A., & Kirkevold, M. (2022). Unidentified communication challenges in the intensive care unit: A qualitative study using multiple triangulations. Australian Critical Care, 35(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2022.01.006
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Tetzlaff, J. M. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International Journal of Surgery, 88, 105906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906
Parra, M. O. (2017). Historia y evolución de la medicina crítica: de los cuidados intensivos a la terapia intensiva y cuidados críticos. Acta Colombiana de Cuidado Intensivo, 17(4), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acci.2017.08.006
Pota, V., Coppolino, F., Barbarisi, A., Passavanti, M. B., Aurilio, C., Sansone, P., & Pace, M. C. (2022). Pain in Intensive Care: A Narrative Review. Pain and Therapy, 11(2), 359–367.
Rijkenberg, S., Stilma, W., Endeman, H., Bosman, R. J., & Straaten, H. M. O. (2015). Pain measurement in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: behavioral pain scale versus critical-care pain observation tool. Journal of Critical Care, 30(1), 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.09.007
Schiavo, C. L., Borges, R. B., Castro, S. M. J., Wolmeister, A. S., Souza, A. D., Martins, O. R. S., ... & Caumo, W. (2022). Measuring emotional preoperative stress by an app approach and its applicability to predict postoperative pain. PLOS One, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263275
Zwakhalen, S. M. G., Hamers, J. P., Abu-Saad, H. H., & Berger, M. P. F. (2006). Pain in elderly people with severe dementia: a systematic review of behavioural pain assessment tools. BMC Geriatrics, 6(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-6-3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Francisco Wallace Bezerra Salviano; João Emanuel Braga Amaro Vieira; Metton Ribeiro Lopes e Silva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
