Techniques and complications of mastopexy associated with breast implants: Literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v14i2.48170Keywords:
Mastopexy; Breast implant; Breast augmentation; Plastic surgery.Abstract
Brazil is one of the countries that performs the most plastic surgeries in the world. Currently, mastopexy associated with breast implants is one of the most frequently performed procedures in Brazil. The article aims to analyze the techniques and risks of mastopexy with breast implants. The narrative bibliographic review methodology was used to prepare the study. Regarding the surgical technique, mastopexy can be performed in different ways and each one has its own indication. The periareolar technique is used in patients who have a small degree of ptosis and smaller size. It is the least invasive technique, with the smallest scar. Mastopexy with a vertical scar presents a greater degree of invasion in relation to the periareolar technique. It is indicated for breasts that have moderate ptosis and intermediate size. The technique with an inverted “T” scar is the most widely used model. It is the most invasive technique, being indicated for severe and serious ptosis, with larger breasts, greater amount of skin and fatty tissue. Regarding the prosthesis, silicone can be implanted subglandularly and submuscularly, with submuscular being the most commonly used for patients who have undergone mastopexy. Therefore, an individualized analysis of each patient is essential to choose the best option, and the plastic surgeon must take into account scientific evidence and the patient's wishes.
References
Baxter, R. (2004). Indications and practical applications for high-profile saline breast implants. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 24 (1), 24–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2003.10.005.
Biazus, J. V., Zucatto, A. E., & De Melo, M. P. (2012). Cirurgia da Mama. Artmed.
Campos, J. H. & Campos, L.E.V. (2019). Tratamento cirúrgico da ptose mamária. Rev. Bras. Cir. Plást. 34 (0): 22-24.
Cárdenas-Camarena, L. & Encinas-Brambila, J. (2009). Round Gel Breast Implants or Anatomic Gel Breast Implants: Which is the Best Choice? AestheticPlastic Surgery. 33 (5), 743–751. doi: 10.1007/s00266-009-9370-8.
Carramaschi, F. R. & Tanaka, M. P. (2003). Mastopexy Associated with Inclusion of Mammary Prostheses . Rev. Bras. Cir. Plást. 18 (1): 26-36.
Casarin, S. T. et al. (2020). Tipos de revisão de literatura: considerações das editoras do Journal of Nursing and Health. Journal of Nursing and Health. 10 (5). https://periodicos.ufpel.edu.br/index.php/enfermagem/article/view/19924.
Castro, C. C. et al. (2002). Concepts on Mammaplasties and Mastopexies. Rev. Bras. Cir. Plást. 17 (3): 19-26.
Coombs, D. M. et al. (2019). Breast augmentation surgery: Clinical considerations. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. 86 (2), 111-22.
Daher, J.C. et al. (2012). Mastopexia associada a implante de silicone submuscular ou subglandular: sistematização das escolhas e dificuldades. Rev Bras Cir Plást. 27 (2):294-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1983-51752012000200021
Feevale Rother, E. T. (2007). Revisão sistemática x revisão narrativa. Acta Paul. Enferm. 20 (2). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-21002007000200001.
Fortes, F. B. (2019). Tipos de Próteses Mamárias: Tire suas dúvidas. In: Dr. Flávio Borges Fortes Cirurgia Plástica. Blog http://clinicaborgesfortes.com.br/tipos-de-proteses-mamarias-esclareca-suas-duvidas/
Gomes, R. S. (2008). Mastopexy with superior pedicle flap and silicone implant. Rev. Bras. Cir. Plást. 23 (4): 241-7
Graça, L. (2020). Tratamento da ptose mamária através da colocação de implantes de silicone subfascial seguidos de mastopexia em "T" invertido. Rev. Bras. Cir. Plást. 35 (3): 269-75
Jones, G. (2019). Bostwick’s plastic and reconstructive breast surgery. (4a ed.) Ed. Thime Medical.
Maximiliano, J. et al. (2017). Breast augmentation: Correlation between surgical planning and complication rates after surgery. Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica. 32 (3), 332–338.
Mélega, M., et al. (2011). Cirurgia plástica: Os princípios e a atualidade. Guanabara Koogan.
Peixoto, G. (1980). Reduction mammaplasty. A personal technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 69 (2): 217-22.
Prodanov, C. C., & Freitas, E. C. (2013). Metodologia do trabalho científico: métodos e técnicas da pesquisa e do trabalho acadêmico. (2a ed.), Nova Hamburgo: Editora
Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica (2016). Mamoplastia de Aumento. https://sbcp-sc.org.br/cirurgias-e-procedimentos/mama/mamoplastia-de-aumento/
Sodré, R.L. et al. (2023). The L-shaped mastopexy. Rev. Bras. Cir. Plást. 38 (2): e0684
Souza, M. T., et al. (2010) Revisão integrativa: o que é e como fazer. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082010RW1134.
Tavares-Filho, J. M., Franco, D. & Franco, T. (2015). Round versus anatomical breast implants: algorithm for choosing the appropriate form. Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica (RBCP)–Brazilian Journal of Plastic Surgery, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.5935/2177-1235.2015RBCP0173.
Toronto, C. E. & Remington, R. (2020). A step-by-step guide to conducting an integrative review. Cham, Swizterland: Springer International Publishing
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Amanda Martins Fagundes; Ártemis Sandra Borges Nunes Costa; Felipe Neiva Barbosa; Alanna Malheiros Silva; Carla Gabriela Costa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
