Pancasila internalization and implementation as a deradicalized effort in Indonesia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i8.5027

Keywords:

Pancasila implementation; Deradicalize; The unity and progress of the indonesian people.

Abstract

The issue of diversity has recently been challenged by the rise of religious radicalism and terrorism groups that can cause the splitting of national unity. In the context of Indonesia they want to replace the ideology of Pancasila into an ideology of religion by forming Indonesia into a Khilafah state. The rise of religious radicalism groups often lead to acts of intolerance and terrorism, both in various countries and in Indonesia. Various incidents of intolerance and acts of violence in the name of religion occur in various places in the world. These incidents cause dehumanization which is very degrading to human dignity. In addition to the rampant intolerance and terrorism in Indonesia there is also a tendency for the politicization of religion as a tool for practical politics. This has led to national divisions which can threaten the existence and continuity of the unitary state of the Republic of Indonesia (NKRI). The Pancasila ethics are the efforts to understanding the concepts of God in religions where the conditions of the population are compound, so tolerance in implementing the religious life can be happened among diverse community in Indonesia. Besides, it needed to revitalize the understanding of the deity that has a good culture in education, the Indonesian policy or acculturation of Pancasila value in Indonesian citizen. Therefore, by internalizing and implementing Pancasila Indonesia could become a large and developed nation.

References

Cindy, A. (2011). Bung Karno Penyambung lidah rakyat Indonesia. Media Presindo.

Driyarkara. (2006). Karya lengkap Driyarkara:Esai-Esai Filsafat Pemikir Yang Trlibat Penuh Dalam Perjuangan Bangsanya. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Hastangka, H., Armawi, A., & Kaelan, K. (2019). Philosophical Review on the Meaning of the Term “Four Pillars” of MPR RI. Jurnal Humaniora. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.v31i1.34789

Latif, Y. (2015). Negara Paripurna. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Muhibat, S. F. (2014). Indonesia 2014-2019, Agenda sosial-Politik dan Keamanan. Jakarta: CSIS.

Murdiati, C. W. S., Bernadus, W., Susilawati, M. (2017). Model of Pancasila education with feminis perspective. International Conference on Caracter Education For 21st Century Global Citizen. Yogyakarta.

Notonagoro. (1981). Pengantar Ke Alam Pemikiran Kefilsafatan. Yogyakarta: Penerbit UGM.

Notonagoro. (1983). Pancasila Secara Ilmiah Populer. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Pattipeilohy, S. Y. E. (2018). Ketuhanan yang BerkebudayaanKetuhanan yang Berkebudayaan: Memahami Pancasila sebagai Model Interkulturalitas. GEMA TEOLOGIKA. https://doi.org/10.21460/gema.2018.32.363

Ruslan, I. (2015). ISLAM DAN RADIKALISME: Upaya Antisipasi dan Penanggulangannya. KALAM. https://doi.org/10.24042/klm.v9i2.329

Sastrapratedja. (2013). Lima Gagasan Yang Dapat Mengubah Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusat Kajian Filsafat dan Pancasila.

Soekarno. (1965). Di Bawah Bendera Revolusi. Jakarta: Panitya Penerbit.

Suprapto, S. (1989). Relevansi Pendidikan Etika Pancasila Bagi Usaha Pengembangan Ilmu Pengetahuan Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: UGM Dep Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan.

Syam, N. (2009). Tantangan Multikulturalisme di Indonesia, Dari Radikalisme Menuju Kebangsaan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Zubair, A. C., & Bakker, A. (1990). Metodologi Penelitian Filsafat. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Downloads

Published

13/07/2020

How to Cite

SUSILAWATI, M. D.; KUSWANJONO, A.; SYAMSUDIN, M. Pancasila internalization and implementation as a deradicalized effort in Indonesia. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 8, p. e451985027, 2020. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v9i8.5027. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5027. Acesso em: 26 apr. 2024.

Issue

Section

Human and Social Sciences