Post-New Public Management, governance and external control: a necessary dialogue
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i8.6647Keywords:
Post-new public management; Governance; External control.Abstract
This article aims to analyze the theoretical assumptions of P-NPM and governance in its dynamic perspective, as well as the role of external control bodies under this managerial theory that is opposed to the Weberian model. The analysis deals with the changes proposed by the post-new public management, under the direct influence of governance and the need for external control bodies in the Public Administration to dialogue with this new administrative practice. The methodology used was the descriptive as to the object of study, using the hypothetical-deductive approach. The conclusions of the work indicate that the external control bodies have a performance focused on formal aspects, based on sterile legalism, being necessary to reformulate this performance, focusing on the social results obtained, favoring the emergence of new ways of solving problems. and new institutional arrangements.
References
Batista Júnior, O. A. & Campos, S. (2014). A administração pública consensual na modernidade líquida. Fórum Administrativo, 155, 31-43.
Brasil. (1995). Plano Diretor da Reforma do Aparelho do Estado. Câmara da Reforma do Estado. Ministério da Administração Federal e Reforma do Estado. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República.
Cavalcante, P. (2017). Gestão pública contemporânea: do movimento gerencialista ao pós-NPM. Brasília: IPEA.
Cavalcante, P. & Pires, R. R. C. (2018). Governança Pública: das prescrições formais à construção de uma perspectiva estratégica para a ação governamental. In: Cavalcante, P. & Pires, R. R. C. (org.) Boletim de análise político-institucional (n. 19, pp. 9-15). Brasília: IPEA.
Christensen, T. (2012). Post-NPM and changing public governance. Meiji Journal of Political Science and Economics, Tokyo, vol. 01. Recuperado de http://mjpse.meiji.jp/articles/files/01-01/01-01.pdf.
Dunleavy, P. & Christopher, H. (1993). From old public administration to new public management. Public Money and Management, 14, n. 3, 9-16.
Dunleavy, P. et al. (2006). New public management is dead-long live digital-era governance. Journal of public administration research and theory, 16, n. 3, pp. 467-494.
Filgueiras, F. (2018). Burocracias do controle, controle da burocracia e accountability no Brasil. In: Pires, R. & Lotta G. & Oliveira, V. E. (org.) Burocracia e políticas públicas no Brasil: interseções analíticas (pp. 355-381). Brasília: IPEA.
Frederickson, H. G. (2007). Whatever happened to public administration? Governance, governance everywhere. In: Ferlie, E. & Lynn Jr., L. E. & Pollit, C. (org.) The Oxford Handbook of Public Management (pp. 282-304). Oxford: Oxford university press.
Hupe, P. & Pollit, C. (2010). The magic of good governance. Recuperado de http://hdl.handle.net/1765/51017.
Kaufmann, D. & Kraay, A. & Mastruzzi, M. (2009). Governance Matters VIII: aggregate and individual governance indicators 1996-2008. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, Washington, n° 4978. Recuperado de http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/pt/598851468149673121/Governance-matters-VIII-aggregate-and-individual-governance-indicators-1996-2008.
Levi-Faur, D. (2012). From “Big Government” to “Big governance”? In: Levi-Faur, D. (org.) The Oxford Handbook of Governance (pp. 3-18). Oxford: Oxford university press.
Manning, N. (2001). The legacy of the new public management in developing countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, Londres, 67, 297-312.
Nogueira, R. A. & Gaetani, F. (2018). A questão do controle no debate de governança pública. In: Cavalcante, P. & Pires, R. R. C. (org.) Boletim de análise político-institucional (n. 19, pp. 91-102). Brasília: IPEA.
Peters, B. G. (2010). Governance as political theory. Jerusalem Papers in Regulation & Governance, Jerusalem, n° 22. Recuperado de http://regulation.huji.ac.il/papers/jp22.pdf.
Pollit, C. & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: a comparative analysis – new public management, governance and the neo-weberian state. Oxford: Oxford university press.
RHODES, R. A. W. (2012). Waves of governance. In: LEVI-FAUR, David (Org.) The Oxford Handbook of Governance (pp. 33-48). Oxford: Oxford university press.
SCHAPIRO, M. G. (2016). Discricionariedade desenvolvimentista e controles democráticos: uma tipologia dos desajustes. Revista Direito GV, 12, n. 2, 311-344.
TCU - TRIBUNAL DE CONTAS DA UNIÃO. (2018) Acórdão n° 2699; Tribunal Pleno; Rel. Ministro Bruno Dantas. Brasília: TCU.
WEBER, M. (1982). Ensaios de Sociologia. Rio de Janeiro: LTC – Livros Técnicos e Científicos Editora S.A.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Mateus Wildberger, José Gileá
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
