Quality of eggs packaged in different types of packaging and stored in commercialization stations in the Municipality of São João del - Rei , MG

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i9.7337

Keywords:

Environment; Haugh unity; Regression; Triple interaction.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of eggs packaged in different types of packaging and stored at marketing stations in the municipality of São João del-Rei, over 35 days. 360 white eggs from Hy Line W36 liners were used, distributed in a completely randomized experimental design in a 2x3x5 factorial scheme (two storage locations / supermarkets (S1 and S2), 3 types of packaging (Styrofoam (Iso), plastic (Plas ) and cellulose (Cel)) and five evaluation periods: 7, 14, 21, 28 and 35 days), totaling 30 treatments with four repetitions, consisting of 3 eggs each. The data obtained for each parameter were subjected to analysis of variance, adopting a significance level of 5%. In case of statistical significance (P <0.05) for interaction between the period, type of packaging and supermarket, linear or quadratic regression models were adjusted for the response variables. Weight loss, albumen height, average albumen diameter and Haugh unit showed interaction (p <0.05) between Period, Supermarket and Packaging. Specific gravity decreased (p <0.05) after the 21st day of storage. The yolk and albumen pH and shell rate were not affected (p> 0.05) by the type of packaging. The eggs evaluated at 35 days showed high pH and yolk rate (p <0.05) and reduced pH and albumen rate (p <0.05). The storage period negatively affects the internal quality characteristics of the eggs. The plastic and Styrofoam packaging have better results in maintaining the quality of eggs over time, the first being more suitable. The location where the eggs are stored influences the quality of the egg. There was a difference between supermarkets.

Author Biography

Thiago Ferreira Diana, Universidade Federal de Viçosa

Departamento de Zootecnia

References

Abdou, A. M., Kim, M., & Sato, K. (2013). Functional proteins and peptides of hen’s egg origin. Bioactive food peptides in health and disease, 117-121.Acessadoem 04 de Agosto de 2020.Disponível em: http://www.intechopen.com/books/bioactive-food-peptides-in-health-anddisease/functional-proteins-and-peptides-of-hen-s-egg-origin.

Alleoni, A. C. C., & Antunes, A. J. (2001). Unidade Haugh como medida da qualidade de ovos de galinha armazenados sob refrigeração. Scientia Agricola, 58(4), 681-685.

Al-Shadeedi, S. M. (2018). Study the Microbial Contamination of Table Egg Containers and Pakkages in Baghdad. In 10th InternationalPoultryConference-Proceeding.

Brant, A. W. „AW Otte and KH Norris, 1951. Recommended standards for scoring and measuring opened egg quality. FoodTechnol, 5, 356-361.

Brito, A. T. C. Qualidade de ovos comercializados na cidade de Boa Vista-RR armazenados a diferentes temperaturas. Trabalho de conclusão de curso. Universidade Federal de Roraima, 2013.

Cruz, F. K. D., Garcia, E. R. D. M., Ferraz, A. L. J., Souza, K. M. R. D., Feliciano, W. B., &Rohod, R. V. (2016). Qualidade e estabilidade dos ovos de poedeiras alimentadas com licopeno e minerais orgânicos. Ciência Rural, 46(1), 157-162.

de Figueiredo, T. C. (2012). Influência das condições e do período de armazenamento nas características físico-químicas, microbiológicas e nos níveis de aminas bioativas em ovos para exportação. Acesso em: 04 de Agosto 2020 Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/BUBD-8ZUJ4P/1/influ_ncia_das_condi__es_e_do_per_odo_de_armazenamento_nas_c.pdf.

Dias, A. G. F., de Lucca, É. C. L., Gouveia, A. B. V. S., da Silva Junior, R. M., Silveira, A. C. P., de Paulo, L. M., ... & Teodoro, J. C. (2020). Desempenho, qualidade de ovos e controle de ectoparasitas em poedeiras em idades avançadas suplementadas com produto homeopático. Research, Society and Development, 9(7), e719974745-e719974745.

dos SANTOS, M. D. S. V., Espíndola, G. B., Lôbo, R. N. B., Freitas, E. R., Guerra, J. L. L., & Santos, A. B. E. (2009). Efeito da temperatura e estocagem em ovos. Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, 29(3), 513-517.

Eke, M.O., Olaitan, N.I. and Ochefu, J.H. (2013). Effect of Storage Conditions on the Quality Attributes of Shell (table) Eggs. Nigerian Food Journal, 31, 18-24.

FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). (2003). Egg marketing: a guide for the production and sale of eggs. FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin 150.

FAO, 2017. Marketing Guide No. 4, Marketing eggs and poultry by J.C. Abbott and G.F. Stewart, first published in 1961. It has been prepared by Edward S. Seidler, Senior Officer (Marketing), AGSF, and Martin Hilmi who worked in FAO under FAO’s Volunteer Programme, http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/Y4628E/y4628e01.htm#TopOfPage

Ferreira, J. I. (2013). Qualidade interna e externa de ovos orgânicos produzidos por aves da linhagem Isa Brown® ao longo de um período de postura.

Figueiredo, T. C., Assis, D. C. S., Menezes, L. D. M., Oliveira, D. D., Lima, A. L., Souza, M. R., ... &Cançado, S. V. (2014). Effects of packaging, mineral oil coating, and storage time on biogenic amine levels and internal quality of eggs. Poultry Science, 93(12), 3171-3178.

Garcia, E. R. D. M., Orlandi, C. C. O., de Oliveira, C. A. L., da Cruz, F. K., dos Santos, T. M. B., &Otutumi, L. K. (2010). Qualidade de ovos de poedeiras semipesadas armazenados em diferentes temperaturas e períodos de estocagem. Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal, 11(2).

Guedes, L. L. M., Souza, C. M. M., Saccomani, A. P. D. O., Faria Filho, D. E. D., Suckeveris, D., & Faria, D. E. D. (2016). Internal quality of laying hens' commercial eggs according to storage time, temperature and packaging. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, 38(1), 87-90.

Haugh, R. R. (1937). The Haugh unit for measuring egg quality. United States egg and poultry magazine, 43, 522-555.

Hincke, M. T., Nys, Y.,Gautron, J., Mann, K., Rodriguez-Navarro, A. B., &McKee, M. D. (2012). The eggshell: structure, composition and mineralization. Front Biosci, 17(1266), 80.

Lana, S. R. V., Lana, G. R. Q., Salvador, E. D. L., Lana, Â. M. Q., Cunha, F. S. A., &Marinho, A. L. (2017). Qualidade de ovos de poedeiras comerciais armazenados em diferentes temperaturas e períodos de estocagem. Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal, 18(1), 140-151.

Leandro, N. S. M., Deus, H. A. B. D., Stringhini, J. H., Café, M. B., Andrade, M. A., & Carvalho, F. B. D. (2005). Aspectos de qualidade interna e externa de ovos comercializados em diferentes estabelecimentos na região de Goiânia. Ciência Animal Brasileira. 6(2), 71-78.

Li-chan, E.; Powrie, W. D; Nakai, S.The chemistry of eggs and egg products.In. W. J. Stadelman; O. J. Cotterill (1994) (Ed) Egg Science and Technology.Haworth Press, Inc. Cap.6, p.105-176.

Mendonça, M. D. O., Reis, R. D. S., Barreto, S. L. D. T., Muniz, J. C. L., Viana, G. D. S., Mencalha, R., ...& Ribeiro, C. L. N. (2013). Qualidade de ovos de codorna submetidos ou não a tratamento superficial da casca armazenados em diferentes ambientes. Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal, 14(1), 195-208.

Moreng, R. E., & Evans, J. S. (1990).Ciência e produção de aves: aquecimento, criação, alojamento, equipamentos e produção de aves. São Paulo: Roca, 227- 249.

R Core Team (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.

Salvador, E. D. L. (2011). Qualidade interna e externa de ovos de poedeiras comerciais armazenados em diferentes temperaturas e períodos de estocagem. Acessado em 2 de Agosto de 2020. Disponível em: http://200.17.114.109/bitstream/riufal/1135/1/Edivania%20de%20Lima%20Salvador%202011%20dissertacaoo.pdf.

Scott, T. A., & Silversides, F. G. (2000). The effect of storage and strain of hen on egg quality. Poultry science, 79(12), 1725-1729.

Senanayake, S., Karunarathne, K., &Wickramasinghe, H. (2016).Preservation of Quality Indices of Commercial Eggs in Different Packing Materials at Control Temperature in Sri Lanka.In Proceedings of 15th Agricultural Research Symposium (Vol. 523, p. 527).

Seydim, A.C. and Dawson, P.L. (1999). Packing Effect on Shell Breakage Rates during simulated transportation. Poultry science, 78, 148-151.

Shang, X. G., Wang, F. L., Li, D. F., Yin, J. D., & Li, J. Y. (2004).Effects of dietary conjugated linoleic acid on the productivity of laying hens and egg quality during refrigerated storage. Poultry science, 83(10), 1688-1695.

Silversides, F. G., &Budgell, K. (2004).The relationships among measures of egg albumen height, pH, and whipping volume. Poultry Science, 83(10), 1619-1623.

USDA – United States Department of Agriculture. Egg-Grading Manual.n.75, 2000.

Wickramasinghe, H.K. Janaka P., Vidanarachchi, Janak K., Himali, S.M. Chandima and Fernando, Palika S. (2012). Effect of Different Packing materials on quality characteristics of chicken eggs during storage at room temperature in Sri Lanka. Proceedings of the 13th ASEAN Food Conference, 9-11 September 2013, Max Atria, Singapore.

Yuceer, M., & Caner, C. (2014). Antimicrobial lysozyme–chitosan coatings affect functional properties and shelf life of chicken eggs during storage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 94(1), 153-162.

Published

20/08/2020

How to Cite

DIANA, T. F.; COBUCCI, J. M. .; MARQUES, K. C.; TEIXEIRA, A. de O. .; BRIGHENTI, C. R. G.; FERREIRA, V. P. de A. .; REIS, R. de S. . Quality of eggs packaged in different types of packaging and stored in commercialization stations in the Municipality of São João del - Rei , MG. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 9, p. e328997337, 2020. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v9i9.7337. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/7337. Acesso em: 25 apr. 2024.

Issue

Section

Agrarian and Biological Sciences