Geographical indication and “cachaça” quality according to the perception of enjoyers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i10.8365Keywords:
Protected geographical indication; Protected designation of origin; Quality factors; Consumer behavior.Abstract
The concept of product quality, from the consumer's point of view, is based on its subjective perceptions. However, in the process of purchasing a product, some quality attributes can be observed, assisting the consumer to make his decision. Among these attributes, seals of geographical indication have been identified as indicators of quality of food products and can be considered by consumers to guide the choice. In order to assess the relevance of quality signs and attributes in the choice of Cachaça, by consumers with a high level of knowledge and a high degree of involvement with the beverage, questionnaires were applied to this audience. The results showed that sensory attributes are the most important parameters for cachaça lovers. However, before tasting the product, factors such as brand, price and marketing are more relevant at the time of purchase. The results showed that geographic origin is not yet a relevant concept for this kind of consumers.
References
Anjos, J. P. dos, Cardoso, M. das G., Saczk, A. A., Dórea, H. S., Santiago, W. D., Machado, A. M. R., … Nelson, D. L. (2011). Evolution of the Concentration of Phenolic Compounds in Cachaça during Aging in an Oak (Quercus sp.) Barrel. J. Braz. Chem. Soc., 22(7), 1307–1314.
Aquino, F. W. B., Ronaldo, F., Rodrigues, S., & Casemiro, A. R. S. (2006). Determinação de marcadores de envelhecimento em cachaças. Ciênc. Tecnol. Aliment., 26(1), 145–149.
Banović, M., Grunert, K. G., Barreira, M. M., & Fontes, M. A. (2010). Consumers’ quality perception of national branded, national store branded, and imported store branded beef. Meat Science, 84(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.08.037
Barahona, I., Sanmiguel Jaimes, E. M., & Yang, J. (2020). Sensory attributes of coffee beverages and their relation to price and package information: A case study of Colombian customers’ preferences. Food Science & Nutrition, 8(2), 1173–1186. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1404
Bezerra. F. A. Análise fatorial. In: Corrar, L. J., Paulo, E., Dias Filho, J. M. (Coord). Análise multivariada para os cursos de Administração, Ciências Contábeis e Economia. 1 ed. - 5. reimp. São Paulo: Atlas, 2014. p.73-130.
Boncinelli, F., Dominici, A., Gerini, F., & Marone, E. (2019). Consumers wine preferences according to purchase occasion: Personal consumption and gift-giving. Food Quality and Preference, 71, 270–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.07.013
Brandão, F. S., Ceolin, A. C., Canozzi, M. E. A., Révillion, J. P. P., & Barcellos, J. O. J. (2012). Confiança e agregação de valor em carnes com indicação geográfica. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 64(2), 458–464. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352012000200028
Brasil (1996). Lei n°9.279 de 14 de maio de 1996. D. O. de 15/05/1996 p. 8353.
Brasil (2001). Decreto n°4.062 de 21 de dezembro de 2001. D.O.U. de 26/12/2001, p.4.
Brasil (2005) Instrução Normativa n°13 de 29 de junho de 2005. D.O.U. 30/06/2005, n°124, seção 1, p.3.
Brasil (2007) Ministerio da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Instrução Normativa n°58 de 19/12/2007. D.O.U 08/01/2008.
Brasil (2008) Ministério da Agricultura Pecuária e Abastecimento. Instrução Normativa n°27/2008. D.O.U. de 16/05/2008.
Bredahl, L. (2004). Cue utilisation and quality perception with regard to branded beef. Food Quality and Preference, 15(1), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(03)00024-7
Cardoso, D. C. (2013). Correlação entre a qualidade sensorial e a composição química da cachaça de alambique nova. Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto.
Carneiro, J. de D. S., Minim, V. P. R., Chaves, J. B. P., Silva, C. H. O., & Regazzi, A. J. (2010). Opiniões e atitudes dos consumidores em relação a embalagens e rótulos de cachaça. Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, 30(3), 669–673. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-20612010000300016
Chocarro, R., Cortiñas, M., & Elorz, M. (2009). The impact of product category knowledge on consumer use of extrinsic cues – A study involving agrifood products. Food Quality and Preference, 20(3), 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.09.004
Dortzbach, D., Machado, L. N., Loss, A., & Vieira, E. (2020). Influência do meio geográfico nas características do mel de melato da bracatinga. Research, Society and Development, 9(9), e198997191. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i9.7191
Espartel, L. B., Barcellos, M. D. de, & Goularte, J. H. (2011). O Mercado de cachaça da região Sul do Brasil: Um estudo exploratório. Revista Alcance, 18, 219–236.
Falcão, T. F., & Révillion, J. P. P. (2010). A indicação geográfica de vinhos finos segundo a percepção de qualidade de enófilos. Ciência Rural, 40(2), 423–428. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782010000200031
Ferreira-Junior, A. M (2011). Fatores que afetam o consumo de cachaça. Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo.
Garcia, G. M., Santos, C. P. (2011). O impacto das características pessoais na intenção de compra pela internet e o papel de mediação da familiaridade e da atitude ante a compra pela internet RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 12, 5, 151-181.
Gázquez-Abad, J. C., Jiménez-Castillo, D., & Marín-Carrillo, G. M. (2012). Sinergias entre los atributos del producto y la familiaridad con su origen. Efectos sobre la imagen percibida. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de La Empresa, 15(2), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cede.2011.10.001
Grunert, K. G. (2002). Current issues in the understanding of consumer food choice. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 13, 275–285.
IBRAC- Instituto Brasileiro da Cachaça (2017). Cachaça 2017. Disponível em http://www.ibrac.net/images/PDF/informacoes_imprensa_ibrac_cachaca_maio_2017.pdf
INPI -Instituto Nacional de Propriedade Industrial (2020). Indicaçãoes Geográficas. Disponível em https://www.gov.br/inpi/pt-br/servicos/perguntas-frequentes/indicacoes-geograficas. Acesso em 22/09/2020.
INPI (2013). Instrução Normativa n°25 de 18/03/2013. D.O.U de 19/03/2013.
Junior, A. M. F. (2011). Fatores que afetam o consumo de cachaça. Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2019). Administração de Marketing (15th ed.). São Paulo: Pearson.
Krajnc, B., Bontempo, L., Luis Araus, J., Giovanetti, M., Alegria, C., Lauteri, M., … Ogrinc, N. (2020). Selective Methods to Investigate Authenticity and Geographical Origin of Mediterranean Food Products. Food Reviews International, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2020.1717521
Livat, F., Alston, J. M., & Cardebat, J.-M. (2019). Do denominations of origin provide useful quality signals? The case of Bordeaux wines. Economic Modelling, 81, 518–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.06.003
MAPA- Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento (2020). A Cachaça no Brasil- Dados de registro de cachaças e aguardentes, Ano 2020. Disponível em https://www.gov.br/agricultura/pt-br/assuntos/inspecao/produtos-vegetal/publicacoes/anuario-cachaca2020-web.pdf.
Matsuura, F. C. A. U., Costa, J. I. P, Folegatti, M. I. S. (2004). Marketing de banana: preferências do consumidor quanto aos atributos de qualidade dos frutos. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 26, 1, 48-52. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-29452004000100014.
Mendonça, D., Procópio, D. P., & Santos Corrêa, S. R. (2019). A contribuição das indicações geográficas para o desenvolvimento rural brasileiro. Research, Society and Development, 8(7), e41871152. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v8i7.1152
Minas Gerais (2001). Lei n°13.949 de 11 de julho de 2001. Diário Executivo, 12/07/2001, p. 3.
Pohlmann, M. C. (2014) Análise de conglomerados. Análise multivariada para os cursos de Administração, Ciências Contábeis e Economia. 1 ed. - 5. reimp. São Paulo: Atlas, p.324-388.
Sebrae (2014). Carta de cachaças do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de janeiro, Editora Sebrae.
Spielmann, N., & Gélinas‐Chebat, C. (2012). Terroir? That’s not how I would describe it. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 24(4), 254–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/17511061211280310
Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (1990a). Conceptual model of the quality perception process. Journal of Business Research, 21(4), 309–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(90)90019-A
Stefani, G., Romano, D., & Cavicchi, A. (2006). Consumer expectations, liking and willingness to pay for specialty foods: Do sensory characteristics tell the whole story? Food Quality and Preference, 17(1–2), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.07.010
van Ittersum, K., Meulenberg, M. T. G., van Trijp, H. C. M., & Candel, M. J. J. M. (2007). Consumers’ Appreciation of Regional Certification Labels: A Pan-European Study. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 58(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2007.00080.x
Vecchio, R., & Annunziata, A. (2011). The role of PDO / PGI labelling in Italian consumers’ food choices. Agricultural Economics Review, 12(2), 80–98.
Verbeke, W. (2005). Agriculture and the food industry in the information age. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 32(3), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurrag/jbi017
Verbeke, W. & Ward, R. W. (2006). Consumer interest in information cues denoting quality, traceability and origin: An application of ordered probit models to beef labels. Food Quality and Preference, 17(6), 453–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.05.010
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251446.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Maria Emília Rodrigues Valente ; Nathália de Andrade Neves; Ronaldo Perez; Lúcia Regina Rangel de Moraes Valente Fernandes; João Eustáquio de Lima ; José Benício Paes Chaves
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
