The Insurrection of Eros: about the ruin of negative capacity in contemporary culture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i1.11586Keywords:
Contemporaneity; Negative Capability; Suffering; Culture.Abstract
This work develops a reflection about contemporary culture and current ways of life, discussing some of the logics that not only organize present times, but also that make possible a series of problems of psychosocial nature. It is a qualitative research presented in the form of a theoretical essay that analyzes a culture marked by the impact of the current forms of capitalism on its neoliberal front. In such culture, there is a considerable praise of happiness, of pleasure, of consumerism and of productivity, in order that which escapes the time of capitalism – such as suffering and as negative capability – ceases to be valued and is purged at any price. In this time that postulates happiness as a duty and an imperative, important aspects of existence are disregarded in favor of motions that enclose life in logics of alleged economic development. Thereby it is considered the relevance of culturally neglected elements such as negative capability and suffering as possible tools in the articulation of resistances in face of cultural impositions which crystallize the ways of being in the world.
References
Amaral, J., Michaelsen, T., & Carlesso, J. (2019). Melancolia: Arte, Ciência e História no ocidente. Research, Society And Development, 8(5). https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v8i5.941
Berardi, F. (2005). A fábrica da infelicidade: trabalho cognitivo e crise da new economy. Dp&a.
Bion, W. (2019). Capacidade Negativa (Negative Capability). In: A. Chuster, ed., Capacidade Negativa: um caminho em busca da luz, 1st ed. São Paulo: Zagoboni.
Eyben, P. (2011). AnArquia do Ensaio: (entre experiência e desastre). Alea, 13(2), 283-300.
Fortes, I. (2012). A Dor Psíquica. Companhia de Freud.
French, R. (2001). “Negative capability”: managing the confusing uncertainties of change. Journal Of Organizational Change Management, 14(5), 480-492.
Freud, S. (2010). O mal estar na civilização, novas conferências introdutórias à psicanálise e outros textos. Companhia das Letras.
Freud, S. (2019). O infamiliar [Das Unheimliche]. Autêntica Editora.
Gatti, L. (2004). Como escrever?: ensaio e experiência a partir de adorno. Departamento De Filosofia Da Universidade Federal De São Paulo, 35(23), 161-187.
Han, B. (2015). Sociedade do cansaço. Editora Vozes.
Han, B. (2017). Agonia do Eros. Editora Vozes.
Han, B. (2018). The Expulsion of the Other: society, perception and communication today. Polity Press.
Keats, J. (1899). The complete poetical works and letters of John Keats. Internet Archive. Retrieved 1 May 2020, from https://archive.org/stream/completepoetical00keatrich?ref=ol#page/276/mode/2up.
Larrosa, J. (2003). O ensaio e a escrita acadêmica. Educação & Realidade, 28(2), 101-115.
Larrosa, J. (2004). A Operação Ensaio: sobre o ensaiar e o ensaiar-se no pensamento, na escrita e na vida. Educação & Realidade, 29(1), 27-43.
Le Breton, D. (2012). A Sociologia do corpo. Petrópolis.
Lipovetsky, G. (2004). Os tempos hipermodernos. Editora Barcarolla.
Nietzsche, F. (1998). Genealogia da Moral: uma polêmica. Companhia das Letras.
Nietzsche, F. (2020). Assim falou Zaratustra: um livro para todos e para ninguém. Martin Claret.
Noyama, S. (2009). Adorno e “O ensaio como forma”. Academia. Retrieved 30 September 2020, from https://www.academia.edu/12210205/Adorno_e_O_ensaio_como_forma.
Soares Pereira, A., Moreira Shitsuka, D., Parreira, F., & Shitsuka, R. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica [Ebook] (1st ed.). Retrieved 31 December 2020, from https://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/handle/1/15824/Lic_Computacao_Metodologia-Pesquisa-Cientifica.pdf?sequence=1.
Sousa, P., Moreira, K., Moreira, H., Sousa, J., & Salgado, J. (2020). Conceito de felicidade em Sponville. Research, Society And Development, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i9.7788
Türcke, C. (2010). Sociedade excitada: filosofia da sensação. Editora da Unicamp.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Eduardo Dworzecki Pires; Cleber Gibbon Ratto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.