Assessment of pain in different types of labor in puerperal at Hospital de Clínicas de Passo Fundo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i10.32291Keywords:
Pain; Puerperium; Normal delivery; Cesarean section.Abstract
The puerperium ismark ed by the woman's intense physical and emotional involvement, and it is during this period that discomfort can arise and compromise the patient's quality of life. In addition, the occurrence of pain among mothers, whether acute or chronic, may be related to the type of delivery performed. In this sense, the main objective of this research was to analyze pain in different types of delivery in puerperal women at the Hospital de Clínicas de Passo Fundo according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), in addition to analyzing the type of delivery performed: vaginal, vaginal instrumented or cesarean section, estimate the intensity of pain determined by the puerperal women in the immediate postpartum period and at the time they were interviewed (current pain), took the location of the pain and relate it to the performed mode of delivery, and compare the pain in nulliparous and multiparous. This is a descriptive, quantitative and cross-sectional analytical study in which the population corresponds to the puerperal women, who entered the Maternity Hospital of the Hospital de Clínicas de Passo Fundo (HCPF) and which had, regardless of the route to be performed, within of the first 48 hours of hospitalization, from September to November 2020. Data were transmitted using descriptive statistics, comparison tests and association of variables. Procedures The statisticians were performed using the statistical software Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS ®, V. 25). The research sample consisted of 53 mothers, aged between 16 and 43 years. There was a predominance of puerperal women aged between 22 and 30 years old (45.3%) and also a predominance of cesarean sections (58.5%), according to the other studies researched on the subject. In addition, of the 20 normal deliveries, in 60% of the cases an episiotomy was required (n = 12). The places most affected by pain were in the lower abdomen (n = 26, 49.1%), followed by the abdominal region (34%). Finally, no summary difference was found between the immediate postpartum pain scale and the current pain scale (at the time of the interview) between nulliparous and multiparous women (p> 0.05).
References
Pereira, T. R. C., Montesano, F. T., Ferreira, P. D., Minozzi, A. S., Beleza, A. C. S. (2017). Existe associação entre os desconfortos no puerpério imediato e a via de parto? Um estudo observacional. ABCS Health Sciences, 42(2).
Beleza, A. C. S., Ferreira, C. H. J., Sousa, L. Nakano, A. M. S. (2012). Mensuração e caracterização da dor após episiotomia e sua relação com a limitação de atividades. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 65(2):264-8.
Santos, J. O., Pacheco, T. S., Oliveira, P. S., Hino, P., Gabrielloni, M. C., Barbieri, M. (2016). Avaliação da dor no período puerperal: estudo comparativo entre os tipos de parto. J. Health Sci. Inst, 34(4): 200-205.
Gunawan, C., Mahir, M. (2018). SPSS: (Mudah mengolah Data Dengan IBM SPSS Statistic 25). Deepublish.
Burti, J. S., Cruz, J. P. S., Silva, A. C., Moreira, I. L. (2016). Assistência ao puerpério imediato: o papel da fisioterapia. Revista da Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Sorocaba, 2016, 18(4): 193-8.
Leite, F. M. C., Barbosa, T. K. O., Mota, J. S., Nascimento, L. C. N., Amorim, M. H. C., Primo, C. C. (2013). Perfil socioeconômico e obstétrico de puérperas assistidas em uma maternidade filantrópica. Cogitare Enfermagem, 18(2): 344-350.
Primo, C. C., Amorim, M. H. C., Castro, D. S. (2007). Perfil social e obstétrico das puérperas de uma maternidade. Rev enferm UERJ, 15(2): 161-167.
Leguizamon, J., T, Steffan, J. A., Bonamigo, E. L. (2013). Escolha da via de parto: expectativa de gestantes e obstetras. Revista Bioética, 21(3): 509-517.
Mascarello, K. C., Matijasevich, A., Santos, I. S., Silveira, M. F. (2018). Complicações puerperais precoces e tardias associadas à via de parto em uma coorte no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, 21(e180010).
Santos, R. A. A., Melo, M. C. P., Leal, R. J. M. (2015). Experiência do tipo de parto: relato de puérperas através da análise de discurso. Revista de Ciências Médicas e Biológicas, 14(1): 74-81.
Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO). (2016). Guia Prático - infecções no ciclo gravídico-puerperal: Estreptococo do grupo B em obstetrícia.
Jiang, H., Qian, X., Carroli, G., Garner, P. (2017). Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Priscila Piccoli Rodighiero; Laura Zanella Caús; Caren Taís Piccoli Maronesi; Fabrízzio Martin Pelle Perez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.