Orthognathic surgery vs. osteogenic distraction in cleft patients: literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i5.41618Keywords:
Orthognathic surgery; Osteogenesis, distraction; Cleft palate.Abstract
Introduction: Individuals born with cleft palate may face a number of challenges, including anatomical deformities, dental malocclusion, hearing impairment and speech disorder. Those who develop maxillary hypoplasia may receive osteogenic distraction or later orthognathic surgery, which can reposition the maxilla to a functional and esthetic position. This surgical advancement of the maxilla has been reported for over 30 years. According to the ideal protocol, the lip should be operated from 3 months of age, in a procedure known as cheiloplasty, while 12 months is the time determined for palatoplasty. Objective: To review in the literature what would be the advantages and disadvantages of an early approach to an osteogenic distraction to the detriment of a subsequent orthognathic surgery in cleft patients. Methodology: It was carried out in the period between 2006 and 2019 through the databases: Science direct and Pubmed. Results: A total of 95 articles were found, 26 duplicates were excluded and 69 were selected for the survey. Conclusion: We can see that both surgeries have their benefits performed at the right times during the patient's life, requiring multidisciplinary treatment with psychologists, doctors, speech therapists, among others. However, there is a bias of osteogenic surgery, as we do not always obtain an expected and objective result.
References
Arnett, W. G. (1993). Bergman R. Chaves faciais para o diagnóstico e plano de tratamento ortodôntico–parte I. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 103(4), 299-312.
Cho, B. C., & Kyung, H. M. (2006). Distraction osteogenesis of the hypoplastic midface using a rigid external distraction system: the results of a one-to six-year follow-up. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 118(5), 1201-1212.
Chua, H. D. P., & Cheung, L. K. (2012). Soft tissue changes from maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate—a randomized controlled clinical trial. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 70(7), 1648-1658.
da Silva Freitas, R., Alonso, N., Shin, J. H., Busato, L., Dall'Oglio Tolazzi, A., & de Oliveria e Cruz, G. A. (2009). The Tessier number 5 facial cleft: surgical strategies and outcomes in six patients. The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal, 46(2), 179-186.
Figueroa, A. A., & Polley, J. W. (1999). Management of severe cleft maxillary deficiency with distraction osteogenesis: procedure and results. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 115(1), 1-12.
Figueroa, A. A., Polley, J. W., & Figueroa, A. L. (2009). Introduction of a new removable adjustable intraoral maxillary distraction system for correction of maxillary hypoplasia. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 20(8), 1776-1786.
Figueroa, A. A., Polley, J. W., Friede, H., & Ko, E. W. (2004). Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device in cleft maxillary deformities. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 114(6), 1382-1392.
Ilizarov, G. A. (1990). Clinical application of the tension-stress effect for limb lengthening. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1976-2007), 250, 8-26.
Lurentt, K., Cavalcante, M. A. D. A., Gandelmann, I. H. A., & Salvatore, D. D. F. (2012). Cirurgia ortognática em paciente portador de fissura lábio-palatina: Relato de caso. Revista de Cirurgia e Traumatologia Buco-maxilo-facial, 12(1), 47-52.
Marques, C. G., Maniglia, J. V., & Molina, F. D. (2010). Service profile of Orthognathic Surgery of a medical school. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 76, 600-604.
Mazzotini, R., Freitas, J. A., & Silva Filho, O. D. (1999). Cirugia ortognática no protocolo do tratamento das fissuras lábio-palatais. Cirurgia Ortognática. São Paulo: Santos.
Molina, F., Monasterio, F. O., de la Paz Aguilar, M., & Barrera, J. (1998). Maxillary distraction: aesthetic and functional benefits in cleft lip-palate and prognathic patients during mixed dentition. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 101(4), 951-963.
Palandi, B. B. N., & Guedes, Z. C. F. (2011). Aspects of speech of subjects with cleft palate corrected in different ages. Revista CEFAC, 13, 8-16.
Pu, L. L., Chen, Y. R., Li, Q. F., Wu, W., Park, D. H., Takayanagi, S., & Wei, F. C. (Eds.). (2015). Aesthetic Plastic Surgery in Asians: Principles and Techniques, Two-Volume Set. CRC Press.
Raposo-do-Amaral, C., Raposo-do-Amaral, C., Carone, D., Pinheiro, A., Braga, E., Guidi, M., & Buzzo, C. (2001). Study of the maxillary advancement and complications in cleft and non-cleft patients underwent to orthognathic surgery. Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica, 23(4), 263-267.
Sant'Ana, E., & Janson, M. (2003). Ortodontia e cirurgia ortognática-do planejamento à finalização. Rev. dent. press ortodon. ortop. maxilar, 119-129.
Silva Filho, O. G. D., Rosa, L. A. D. A., & Lauris, R. D. C. M. C. (2007). Influence of isolated cleft palate and palatoplasty on the face. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 15, 199-208.
Swennen, G., Colle, F., De Mey, A., & Malevez, C. (1999). Maxillary distraction in cleft lip palate patients: a review of six cases. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 10(2), 117-122.
Tannure, P. N., & Moliterno, L. F. M. (2013). Fissura palatina: apresentação de um caso clínico. Revista de Odontologia da UNESP, 36(4), 341-345.
Vaccari-Mazzetti, M. P., Kobata, C. T., & Brock, R. S. (2009). Distração Óssea Maxilar na Sequela de Fissura Lábio Palatina. Relato de Caso. Arquivos Catarinenses de Medicina, 38(Suplemento 01), 49.
Worley, M. L., Patel, K. G., & Kilpatrick, L. A. (2018). Cleft lip and palate. Clinics in perinatology, 45(4), 661-678.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Brunnah Rafaella Mapurunga Setúbal; Letícia Mendes da Rocha Lopes; Matheus Araújo Brito Santos Lopes; Giselle Maria Ferreira Lima Verde; Erik Neiva Ribeiro de Carvalho Reis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
