Advances in bariatric surgery techniques in Brazil: An integrative review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i9.43212Keywords:
General surgery; Surgical intervention; Robotic surgical procedures.Abstract
Bariatric surgery is considered an option for patients with severe obesity who have not had significant success with non-surgical weight loss methods. However, although there are several techniques, little is discussed about them. In this context, the objective of this work was to explore new surgical techniques customized for patients indicated for bariatric surgery, also considering robotics as a support for these techniques. This is an integrative review of the last 10 years (2013 to 2023) using three bibliographic databases. 21 articles were used to compose the review. Among the existing techniques of bariatric surgery, the mini Gastric By-pass, the Duodenal Switch and the Single-Anastomosis Duodenal Switch (SADS) stand out. It can also be concluded that robotics has helped bariatric surgeries by offering greater solutions, improved three-dimensional visualization and more delicate movements, contributing to less invasive procedures and faster recoveries.
References
Bauerle, W. B., Mody, P., Estep, A., Stoltzfus, J., & El Chaar, M. (2023). Current trends in the utilization of a robotic approach in the field of bariatric surgery. Obesity surgery, 33(2), 482-491.
Bianchi, A., Pagan-Pomar, A., Jimenez-Segovia, M., Martinez-Corcoles, J. A., & Gonzalez-Argenté, F. X. (2020). Biliopancreatic diversion in the surgical treatment of morbid obesity: long-term results and metabolic consequences. Obesity Surgery, 30, 4234-4242.
Brown, W. A., de Leon Ballesteros, G. P., Ooi, G., Higa, K., Himpens, J., Torres, A., & IFSO Appointed Task Force Reviewing the Literature on SADI-S/OADS. (2021). Single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy/one anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S/OADS) IFSO position statement—update 2020. Obesity Surgery, 31(1), 3-25.
Cottam, D., Roslin, M., Enochs, P., Metz, M., Portenier, D., & Smith, D. (2020). Single anastomosis duodenal switch: 1-year outcomes. Obesity Surgery, 30, 1506-1514.
Elias, A. A., Roque-de-Oliveira, M., Campos, J. M., Sasake, W. T., Bandeira, Á. A., Silva, L. B., & Garrido Júnior, A. B. (2018). Cirurgia bariátrica robótico-assistida: análise de série de casos e comparação com via laparoscópica. Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, 45.
Gagner, M. (2020). Laparoscopic Duodenal Switch. Foregut Surgery: Achalasia, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Obesity, 265-272.
Galvão, T. F., Tiguman, G. M. B., & Sarkis-Onofre, R. (2022). A declaração PRISMA 2020 em português: recomendações atualizadas para o relato de revisões sistemáticas. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, 31, e2022364.
Gasmi, A., Bjørklund, G., Mujawdiya, P. K., Semenova, Y., Dosa, A., Piscopo, S., & Costea, D. O. (2022). Dietary supplements and bariatric surgery. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition, 1-12.
Godoy, E. P. D., Pereira, S. S. D. S., Coelho, D., Pinto, I. M. D. M., Luz, V. F. D., Coutinho, J. L., & Brandt, C. T. (2019). Bipartição de trânsito intestinal isolada: uma nova estratégia para cirurgia em estágios em superobesos. Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, 46, e20192264.
Li, C., Lin, S., & Liang, H. (2021). Single-anastomosis duodenal switch: conceptual difference between East and West. Obesity Surgery, 31(7), 3296-3302.
Mahawar, K. K., Jennings, N., Brown, J., Gupta, A., Balupuri, S., & Small, P. K. (2013). “Mini” gastric bypass: systematic review of a controversial procedure. Obesity surgery, 23, 1890-1898.
Moon, R. C., Stephenson, D., Royall, N. A., Teixeira, A. F., & Jawad, M. A. (2016). Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: learning curve, perioperative, and short-term outcomes. Obesity surgery, 26, 2463-2468.
Musella, M., Susa, A., Greco, F., De Luca, M., Manno, E., Di Stefano, C., & Piazza, L. (2014). The laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass: the Italian experience: outcomes from 974 consecutive cases in a multicenter review. Surgical Endoscopy, 28, 156-163.
Noun, R., Skaff, J., Riachi, E., Daher, R., Antoun, N. A., & Nasr, M. (2013). One thousand consecutive mini-gastric bypass: short-and long-term outcome. Obesity Surgery, 22, 697-703.
Ozmen, M. M., Guldogan, C. E., & Gundogdu, E. (2020). Changes in HOMA-IR Index levels after bariatric surgery: comparison of single anastomosis duodenal switch-proximal approach (SADS-p) and one anastomosis gastric bypass-mini gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB). International Journal of Surgery, 78, 36-41.
Pereira, S. S., Guimarães, M., Almeida, R., Pereira, A. M., Lobato, C. B., Hartmann, B., & Monteiro, M. P. (2019). Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS) and single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) result in distinct post-prandial hormone profiles. International Journal of Obesity, 43(12), 2518-2527.
Pereira, A. M., Guimarães, M., Pereira, S. S., de Almeida, R. F., Monteiro, M. P., & Nora, M. (2021). Single and dual anastomosis duodenal switch for obesity treatment: a single-center experience. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 17(1), 12-19.
Ramos, A. C., Domene, C. E., Volpe, P., Pajecki, D., D'Almeida, L. A. V., Ramos, M. G., & Kim, K. C. (2013). Resultados iniciais da primeira série de casos brasileira de cirurgia bariátrica totalmente robótica. ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo), 26, 2-7.
Rheinwalt, K. P., Plamper, A., Rückbeil, M. V., Kroh, A., Neumann, U. P., & Ulmer, T. F. (2020). One anastomosis gastric bypass–mini-gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)—a mid-term cohort study with 612 patients. Obesity surgery, 30, 1230-1240.
Rutledge, R., Kular, K., & Manchanda, N. (2019). A técnica original do mini-bypass gástrico. Jornal Internacional de Cirurgia, 61, 38-41.
Sanchez, C. L. (2021). Atualidades sobre cirurgia bariátrica. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 3(4), 07-21.
Silva, A. F. D., Mendes, K. D. S., Ribeiro, V. D. S., & Galvão, C. M. (2023). Fatores de risco para o desenvolvimento de infecção de sítio cirúrgico em cirurgia bariátrica: revisão integrativa. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 31, e3798.
Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Bariátrica e Metabólica - SBCBM. (2022). Obesidade atinge mais de 6,7 milhões de pessoas no Brasil em 2022. https://www.sbcbm.org.br/. Recuperado em agosto 15, 2023, em: https://www.sbcbm.org.br/obesidade-atinge-mais-de-67-milhoes-de-pessoas-no-brasil-em-2022/#:~:text=A%20obesidade%20grau%20I%20atinge,participaram%20da%20tabula%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20do%20SISVAN.
Strain, G. W., Torghabeh, M. H., Gagner, M., Ebel, F., Dakin, G. F., Abelson, J. S., & Pomp, A. (2017). The impact of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS) over 9 years. Obesity surgery, 27, 787-794.
Topart, P., & Becouarn, G. (2017). The single anastomosis duodenal switch modifications: a review of the current literature on outcomes. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 13(8), 1306-1312.
Topart, P., Becouarn, G., & Finel, J. B. (2020). Comparison of 2-year results of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and transit bipartition with sleeve gastrectomy for superobesity. Obesity surgery, 30, 3402-3407.
Veilleux, E., Ponce, J., & Lutfi, R. (2020). A review of the role of robotics in bariatric surgery: finding our future? Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 30(1), 36-39.
Wharton, S., Lau, D. C., Vallis, M., Sharma, A. M., Biertho, L., Campbell-Scherer, D., & Wicklum, S. (2020). Obesity in adults: a clinical practice guideline. Cmaj, 192(31), E875-E891.
Zilberstein, B., Santo, M. A., & Carvalho, M. H. (2019). Análise crítica das técnicas de tratamento cirúrgico da obesidade mórbida. ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo), 32.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Vitor Araújo Vieira; Rafael Dal Santo Cassarotti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
