Evaluation of the efficacy of biological agents used to treat Dress Syndrome refractory to corticosteroids: A scoping review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v14i2.48230

Keywords:

Drug hypersensitivity syndrome; Biological products; Drug-related side effects and adverse reactions.

Abstract

Patients with Dress Syndrome often present resistance to traditional pharmacological therapies, which include the use of corticosteroids and pulse therapy. In severe and recurrent cases of this syndrome, the use of biological agents tends to be strongly recommended, allowing the prevention of possible deleterious outcomes. The present study aims to evaluate the efficacy of biological agents used for Dress Syndrome refractory to corticotherapy. For this scoping review, carried out through the PubMed and ScienceDirect platforms, between the years 2022 and 2025, the descriptors chosen were ‘’Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome’’, ‘’Biological Products’’ and ‘’Adverse Drug Event’’. The inclusion criteria consisted of (1) Evaluation of the use and efficiency of biological agents, (2) Analysis of the management of Dress Syndrome refractory to corticosteroid therapy, (3) Studies comparing the performance of different immunobiological agents, (4) Texts addressing monitoring, follow-up and clinical management and (5) Articles in English and Portuguese. The exclusion criteria consisted of inappropriateness to the topic, case reports, editorials, studies with animals and texts outside the time limit. Patients with severe Dress who used biological agents early showed a reduction in acute lethal symptoms, as well as a reduction in the length of hospital stay and deleterious outcomes associated with high doses of corticosteroids. The studies demonstrated that compared to the elderly population, young individuals tend to have a better prognosis and therapeutic response. Recommendations regarding the interaction and discontinuation of such biological therapies are controversial topics to be elucidated through new studies.

References

Chen, X., Hu, L., Xiao, Z., Wu, H., Chen, A., & Yu, R. (2023). Características das reações adversas cutâneas a medicamentos, especialmente em relação ao período de incubação, com base em pacientes hospitalizados. Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia (Portuguese), 98(2), 227-232.

Almeida Dornelas, D. B. (2023). Síndrome de dress, principais conceitos clínicos. Repositório de Trabalhos de Conclusão de Curso.

Melo, M. E. F., Porfiro, C. A., Dantas, L. A., Neto Filho, M. A., Triches, C. M. F., & dos Santos, J. S. G. (2022). Principais classes farmacológicas relacionadas à farmacodermia. Research, Society and Development, 11(2), e8011225492-e8011225492.

Gibson, A., Deshpande, P., Campbell, C. N., Krantz, M. S., Mukherjee, E., Mockenhaupt, M., & Phillips, E. J. (2023). Updates on the immunopathology and genomics of severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 151(2), 289-300.

Hama, N., Abe, R., Gibson, A., & Phillips, E. J. (2022). Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS)/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS): clinical features and pathogenesis. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, 10(5), 1155-1167.

James, F., Goh, M. S., Vogrin, S., Ng, I., Douglas, A. P., Holmes, N. E., & Trubiano, J. A. (2024). The Australasian Registry for Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions (AUS-SCAR)–Providing a roadmap for closing the diagnostic, patient, and healthcare gaps for a group of rare drug eruptions. World Allergy Organization Journal, 17(8), 100936.

Kan, A. K. C., Tang, W. T., & Li, P. H. (2024). Helper T cell subsets: Development, function and clinical role in hypersensitivity reactions in the modern perspective. Heliyon, 10(9).

Kuang, F. L., Khoury, P., Weller, P. F., Wechsler, M. E., & Klion, A. D. (2023). Biologics and hypereosinophilic syndromes: knowledge gaps and controversies. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, 11(9), 2666-2671.

López, E., Cabrera,R., & Lecaros, C. (2024). Anais Brasileiros de. Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, 99(4).

Macy, E., Trautmann, A., Chiriac, A. M., Demoly, P., & Phillips, E. J. (2023). Advances in the understanding of drug hypersensitivity: 2012 through 2022. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, 11(1), 80-91.

Park, B. C., Stone, C. A., Dewan, A. K., & Johnson, D. B. (2022). Hypersensitivity reactions and immune-related adverse events to immune checkpoint inhibitors: approaches, mechanisms, and models. Immunology and Allergy Clinics, 42(2), 285-305.

Pereira A. S. et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. UFSM.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of business research, 104, 333-339.

Yaytokgil, Ş. B., Selmanoglu, A., Celik, I. K., Emeksiz, Z. Ş., Ginis, T., Karaatmaca, B., & Misirlioğlu, E. D. (2024). Evaluation of the frequency and characteristics of drug hypersensitivity reactions in hospitalized children: Real life-cohort study. World Allergy Organization Journal, 17(4), 100893.

Wang, C. W., Divito, S. J., Chung, W. H., & Hung, S. I. (2022). Advances in the pathomechanisms of delayed drug hypersensitivity. Immunology and Allergy Clinics, 42(2), 357-373.

Wang, S., Kang, Y., He, C., & Jin, H. (2024). The systemic treatments for drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) beyond corticosteroids. World Allergy Organization Journal, 17(8), 100935.

Published

21/02/2025

How to Cite

SANTOS, T. L.; PARREIRA, W. da S. P.; SILVA, B. F. S. da; MORAIS, M. C. M.; SOUZA, G. C. de; RODRIGUES, B. P.; FRANCO, L. C. de A. Evaluation of the efficacy of biological agents used to treat Dress Syndrome refractory to corticosteroids: A scoping review. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 14, n. 2, p. e7714248230, 2025. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v14i2.48230. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/48230. Acesso em: 2 apr. 2025.

Issue

Section

Health Sciences