Genetic and phenotypic analysis in free-pollination progenies of Mimosa caesalpiniifolia Benth.: implications for genetic improvement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i3.13096Keywords:
Seasonally dry tropical forest; Forest improvement; Molecular marker; Phenotype; Inter Simple Sequence Repeat.Abstract
Mimosa caesalpiniifolia Benth. (Fabaceae) is a tree native to the semiarid region of Northeast Brazil, which presents growing economic potential for the exploitation of timber and non-timber forest products. The presence of aggressive prickles in most plants of this species makes it difficult to manage the stands, but there are specimens without prickles that can be used to get around this inconvenience. Our objective was to determine the phenotypic frequency of the character absence/presence of prickles in progenies of free pollination of a cultivated population of M. caesalpiniifolia, and to access the genetic diversity of individuals of the phenotype without prickles of this population. Genetic diversity was accessed using molecular markers Inter Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR) and phenotyping for the presence/absence of prickles was determined in young individuals from nine free-pollination progenies from three phenotype trees with prickles and six phenotype trees without prickles. The Shannon index (I), Nei genetic diversity (He), percentage of polymorphic bands (P) and Nei genetic identity were calculated. The absence of prickles (77%) was higher that presence prickles (23%). The predominance of the absence of prickles phenotype and the moderate levels of genetic diversity (P = 64%; He = 0.208 and I = 0.315) among individuals with this phenotype may be because of artificial selection for the absence of prickles phenotype in the source population.
References
Akagi, T., Hanada, T., Yaegaki, H., Gradziel, T. M., & Tao, R. (2016). Genome-wide view of genetic diversity reveals paths of selection and cultivar differentiation in peach domestication. DNA Research, 23 (3), 271-282. https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dsw014
Alencar, F. H. H., Paes, J. B., Bakke, O. A., & Silva, G. S. da. (2011). Wood natural resistance of Mimosa caesalpiniifolia Benth. to subterranean termites. Revista Caatinga, 24 (1), 57-64. https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/article/view/1531
Araújo, F. dos, S., Pacheco, M. V., Vieira, F. de, A., Ferrari, C. dos, S., Félix, F. C., & Chagas, K. P. T das. (2016). ISSR molecular markers for the study of the genetic diversity of Mimosa caesalpiniaefolia Benth. Idesia, 34 (3), 47-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34292016000300007
Araujo, J. B. S., & Paes, J. B. (2018). Natural wood resistance of Mimosa caesalpiniifolia in field testing. Floresta e Ambiente, 25 (2), e20150128. https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.012815
Botstein, D., White, R. L., Skolnick, M., & Davis, R. W. (1980). Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 32 (3), 314-331. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1686077/
Brasil. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. (2013). Instruções para Análises de Sementes de Espécies florestais. Brasília: MAPA/ACS. https://www.gov.br/agricultura/pt-br/assuntos/laboratorios/arquivos-publicacoes-laboratorio/florestal_documento_pdf-ilovepdf-compressed.pdf/view
Carvalho, J. H. de, Maia, C. M. N. A., & Amorim, G. C. de. (1990). Seleção de sabiá (Mimosa caesalpiniaefolia Benth.), leguminosa madeireira e forrageira, para obtenção de plantas sem acúleos. Mossoró: ESAM Coleção Mossoroense.
Döhler, T. L., & Pina, W. da, C. (2017). Flower-visiting bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) of sabiá (Mimosa Caesalpiniifolia Benth.) in Teixeira de Freitas, Bahia, Brazil. Scientia Plena, 13 (8), 088001-1. https://doi.org/10.14808/sci.plena.2017.088001
Doyle, J. J., & Doyle, J. L. (1987). Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus, 12, 13-15.
Ingvarsson, P. K., & Dahlberg, H. (2019). The effects of clonal forestry on genetic diversity in wild and domesticated stands of forest trees. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 34 (5), 370-379. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2018.1469665
Lewontin, R. C. (1972). Testing the theory of natural selection. Nature, 236, 181-182. https://doi.org/10.1038/236181a0
Lima, I. C. A. R. de, Lira, M. de, A., Mello, A. C. L. de, Santos, M. V. F. dos, Freitas, E. V. de, & Ferreira, R. L. C. (2008). Avaliação de sabiazeiro (Mimosa caesalpiniaefolia Benth.) quanto a acúleos e preferência por bovinos. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias, 3 (3), 289-294. https://doi.org/10.5039/agraria.v3i3a345
Lins, T. R. da, S., Braz, R. L., Souza-Junior, C. C. G. C. de, Correia, H. T. V., Silva, T. C., & Walter, L. S. (2020). Yield and characterization of charcoal from Mimosa caesalpiniifolia Benth. branches. Biofix Scientific Journal, 5 (1), 39-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/biofix.v5i1.67394
Martins, P. G. S., Lira-Junior, M. A., Fracetto, G. G. M., Silva, M. L. R. B. da, Vincentin, R. P., & Lyra, M. do, C. C. P de. (2015). Mimosa caesalpiniifolia rhizobial isolates from different origins of the Brazilian Northeast. Archives of Microbiology, 197, 459-469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-014-1078-8
Nei, M. (1973). Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 70 (12), 3321-3323. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.70.12.3321
Nei, M. (1978). Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics, 89, 90-583. https://www.genetics.org/content/89/3/583
Pereira, A. S., Shitsuka, D. M., Parreira, F. J., & Shitsuka, R. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. Santa Maria: UFSM/NTE. https://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/handle/1/15824/Lic_Computacao_Metodologia-Pesquisa-Cientifica.pdf?sequence=1
Pritchard, H. W., Moat, J. F., Ferraz, J. B. S., Marks, T. R., Camargo, J. L. C., Nadarajan, J., & Ferraz, I. D. K. (2014). Innovative approaches to the preservation of forest trees. Forest Ecology and Management, 333 (1), 88-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.08.012
Rohlf, F. J. (2000). NTSYS-pc: numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 2.1. New York: Exeter Software.
Silva-Júnior, A. L., Souza, L. C., Pereira, A. G., & Miranda, F. D. (2017). Genetic diversity of Schizolobium parahyba var. amazonicum (Huber ex. Ducke) Barneby, in a forest area in Brazil. Genetics and Molecular Research, 16 (3), e2017. https://doi.org/10.4238/gmr16039774
Yeh, F. C., Boyle, T. Y. Z., & Xiyan, J. M. (1999). Popgene version 131: Microsoft Window-based freeware for population genetic analysis. Edmonton: Alberta.
Yiing, T. S., Fu, C. S., Seng, H. W., & Ling, P. S. (2014). Genetic diversity of Neolamarckia cadamba using dominant DNA markers based on Inter-Simple Sequence Repeats (ISSRs) in Sarawak. Advances in Applied Science Research, 5 (3), 458-463.
Zhang, J., Chen, T., Wang, Y., Chen, Q., Sun, B., Luo, Y., Zhang, Y., Tang, H., & Wang, X. (2018). Genetic diversity and domestication footprints of chinese cherry [Cerasus pseudocerasus (Lindl.) G. Don] as revealed by nuclear microsatellites. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9 (238), 01-13, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00238
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Fernando dos Santos Araújo; Francival Cardoso Félix; Richeliel Albert Rodrigues Silva; Luiz Augusto da Silva Correia; Josenilda Aprígio Dantas de Medeiros; Cibele dos Santos Ferrari; Fábio de Almeida Vieira; Mauro Vasconcelos Pacheco; Roberta de Lima Valença
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
