Diagnóstico de COVID-19 em laboratórios de análisis clínicos

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i1.25286

Palabras clave:

Diagnóstico; COVID-19; Laboratorio de Análisis Clínicos.

Resumen

A partir de diciembre de 2019, una nueva pandemia asola el mundo. El agente responsable de la nueva enfermedad es el coronavirus del síndrome respiratorio agudo severo 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Sin descanso, se ha iniciado una carrera contrarreloj para identificar y descifrar el genoma del coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) con el fin de perfeccionar su diagnóstico. Por tratarse de un problema de salud, el laboratorio de análisis clínicos se convirtió en una pieza clave en el diagnóstico porque está presente en la mayoría de las ciudades brasileñas. Por lo tanto, el objetivo de esta revisión bibliográfica era demostrar qué tipos de pruebas diagnósticas puede realizar el laboratorio de análisis clínicos. La metodología utilizada fue una investigación bibliográfica a partir de fuentes secundarias, utilizando las bases de datos ScienceDirect y Pubmed. La encuesta mostró que el diagnóstico de COVID-19 puede basarse en: biomarcadores correlacionados con el propio virus (material genético), siendo la prueba de referencia el ensayo de reacción en cadena de la polimerasa con transcripción inversa (RT-PCR) en tiempo real; en las moléculas derivadas de la respuesta inmunitaria contra los antígenos virales (producción de anticuerpos) mediante pruebas serológicas (inmunoensayos enzimáticos, micropartícula quimioluminiscente, fluorescencia y flujo lateral) y, en los cambios en la concentración de biomarcadores de órganos afectados por el virus (marcadores inflamatorios, marcadores de la función renal y hepática, etc.). Así, ante el aumento del número de casos y la aparición de nuevas variantes, es de suma importancia difundir el conocimiento y destacar la importancia de los laboratorios clínicos en la vida cotidiana de las comunidades, ante una pandemia.

Citas

Abbasi-Oshaghi, E.; Mmirzaei, F.; Farahani, F.; Khodadadi, I.; Tayebinia, H. (2020). Diagnosis and treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Laboratory, PCR, and chest CT imaging findings. International Journal of Surgery, 79, 143-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.05.018

Akinnuwesi, B. A. et al. (2021). Application of intelligence-based computational techniques for classification and early differential diagnosis of COVID-19 disease. Data Science and Management, In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsm.2021.12.001

Brüssow, H. (2021). COVID-19 by numbers – infections, cases and deaths. Environmental Microbiology, 23(3), 1322-1333. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15377

Carter, C. et al. (2021). SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics: Towards a more comprehensive approach to routine patient testing. Journal of Immunological Methods, 494, 113044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2021.113044

Casarin, S. T. et al. (2020). Tipos de revisão de literatura: considerações das editoras do Journal of Nursing and Health. Journal of Nursing and Health, 10: e20104031. https://periodicos.ufpel.edu.br/ojs2/index.php/enfermagem/article/view/19924

Coltart, C. E. M.; Collet-Fenson, L. (2021). Future development in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.03.012

DW-Brasil. (2021). “O sistema de saúde já colapsou, e vai continuar no colapso”. https://amp.dw.com/pt-br/o-sistema-de-sa%C3%BAde-j%C3%A1-colapsou-e-vai-continuar-no-colapso/a-57130268

Ferenhof, H. A.; Fernandes, R. F. (2016). Desmisticando a revisão de literatura como base para redação científica: Método SSF. Revista ACB: Biblioteconomia, 21(3): 550-563.

G1-Coronavírus. (2021). Vacinação contra Covid: mais d 143 milhões estão totalmente imunizados. https://g1.globo.com/saude/coronavirus/vacinas/noticias2021/12/29/vacinação-contra-a-covid-mais-de-143-milhoes-estao-totalmente-imunizados-13-estados-e-o-df-nao-divulgaram-dados-de-vacinas.ghtml

G1-Mundo. (2021). Pelo segundo dia consecutivo, mundo ultrapassa marca de 1 milhão de casos de Covid em 24 horas. http://g1.globo.com/mundo/noticia/2021/12/29/pelo-segundo-dia-consecutivo-mundo-ultrapassa-marca-de-1-milhao-de-casos-de-covid-em-24-horas.ghtml

Goudouris, E. S. (2021). Laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19. Jornal de Pediatria, 97(1), 7-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2020.08.001

Hellou, M. M. et al. (2021). Nucleic acid amplification tests on respiratory samples for the diagnosis of coronavirus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 23(3), 341-351. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.11.002

Ishige, T. et al. (2020). Highly sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2 by multiplexrRT_PCR for molecular diagnosis of COViD-10 by clinical laboratories. Clinica Chimica Acta, 507, 139-142. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cca.2020.04.023

Jing, R. et al. (2021). Laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19 in China: A review of challenging cases and analaysis. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection, 54(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2020.10.004

Karthik, K. et al. (2020). Biosafety concerns during the collection, transportation, and processing of COVID-19 samples for diagnosis. Archives of Medical Research, 51, 623-630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2020.08.007

Kavsak, P. A.; Wit, K.; Worster, A. (2020). Emerging key laboratory tests for patients with COVID-19. Clinical Biochemistry, 81, 13-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2020.04.009

Lai, C. K. C.; Lam, W. (2021). Laboratory testing for the diagnosis of COVID-19. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 538, 226-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.10.069

Lam, H. Y. et al. A review of epidemiology and public health control measures of COVID-19 variants in Hong Kong, December 2020 to June 2021. IJID Regions, 2, 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijregi.2021.11.002

Leme, L. (2021). Veja quais são as vacinas contra covid-19 já aprovadas para aplicação no Brasil. https://www.acidadeon.com/campinas/cotidiano/vacinas/NOT,0,0,1600052,confira-as-vacinas-contra-covid-19-ja-aprovadas-para-aplicacao-no-brasil.aspx

Li, C. et al. (2020). Laboratory diagnosis of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Clinica Chimica Acta, 510, 35-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.06.045

Nações Unidas. (2021). Para OMS, falha na meta de vacinar 40% da população é “vergonha moral”. https://news.un.org/pt/story/2021/12/1775062

Pourbagheri-Sigaroodi, A.; Bashash, D.; Fateh, F.; Abolghasemi, H. (2020). Laboratory findings in COVID-19 diagnosis and prognosis. Clinica Chimica Acta, 510, 475-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.08.019

Rosa, A.; Lorenzetti, E.; Alecrim, G.; Cocolo, V. (2021). Brasil ultrapassa 400 mil mortes por Covid-19. https://www.cnnbrasil.com.br/saude/2021/04/29/brasil-ultrapassa-400-mil-mortes-por-covid-19

Rosa, M. F. F. et al. (2021). Direct from the COVID-19 crisis: research and innovation sparks in Brazil. Health Research Policy and Systems, 19(10), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-00674-x

Rother, E. T. (2007). Revisão sistemática X revisão narrativa. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, 20(2): v-vi. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-21002007000200001

Ritchie, H. et al. (2021). Coronavirua Pandemic (COVID-19). Published online at OurWorldInData.org. Disponível em: <https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus>.

R7-Brasil. (2021). Mortes por Covid caem em relação a abril, mas maio é o 3° pior mês. https://noticias.r7.com/brasil/mortes-por-covid-caem-em-relacao-a-abril-mas-maio-e-o-3-pior-mes-09062021

Song, L. et al. (2021). Differential diagnosis and prospective grading of COVID-19 at the early stage with simple hematological and biochemical variables. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infections Disease, 99 (2), 115169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115169

Soraya, G. V.; Ulhaq, Z. S. (2020). Crucial laboratory parameters in COVID-19 diagnosis and prognosis: An updated meta-analysis. Medicina Clinica, 155(4), 143-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcle.2020.05.004

Sousa, G. O. et al. (2020). Evolução epidemiológica da COVID-19 no Brasil e no mundo. Research, Society and Development, 9(7), e630974653. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i7.4653

Sousa, M. R. N. et al. (2020). Patogênese e perspectivas de tratamento da Covid-19: uma revisão. Research, Society and Development, 9(7), e05973730. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i7.3730

Taleghani, N.; Taghipour, F. (2021). Diagnosis of COVID-19 for controlling the pandemic: A review of the state-of-the-art. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 174, 112830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2020.112830

Tang, Y.-W.; Schmitz, J. E.; Persing, D. H.; Stratton, C. W. (2020). Laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19: Current issues and challenges. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 58(6), e00512-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00512-20

Vieceli, T. et al. (2020). A predictive score for COVID-19 diagnosis using clinical, laboratory and chest image data. The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 24(4), 343-348. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.bjid.2020.06.009

Younes, N. et al. (2020). Challenges in laboratory diagnosis of the novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Viruses, 12(6), 582. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12060582

Yüce, M.; Filiztekin, E.; Ӧzkaya, K. G. (2021). COVID-19 diagnosis – A review of current methods. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 172, 112752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2020.112752

Zalzala, H. H. (2020). Diagnosis of COVID-19: facts and challenges. New Microbes and New Onfections, 38, 100761. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.nmni.2020.100761

Publicado

13/01/2022

Cómo citar

FIGUEIREDO, S. A.; PAULA, F. B. de A. Diagnóstico de COVID-19 em laboratórios de análisis clínicos. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 1, p. e49511125286, 2022. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v11i1.25286. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25286. Acesso em: 17 jul. 2024.

Número

Sección

Revisiones