Uso de anestesia computarizada en la percepción del dolor y la ansiedad de los niños durante la atención odontológica: protocolo para un ensayo clínico aleatorizado
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i7.42516Palabras clave:
Anestesia; Ansiedad; Comportamiento; Percepción del dolor; Odontopediatría.Resumen
Este estudio fue diseñado para evaluar el uso de anestesia computarizada durante el cuidado dental en niños. Este ensayo controlado aleatorio se llevará a cabo con 92 niños de 5 a 11 años. Los niños serán asignados al azar para recibir anestesia convencional - grupo de control, a anestesia computarizada - grupo de intervención. Para medir la ansiedad del niño se utilizará la Subescala Dental del Children's Fear Survey Schedule - CFSS-DS y el VENHAM Picture Test Modified - VPTM, así como la verificación de la frecuencia cardíaca. Se evaluará el estilo de afrontamiento con la Escala Dental Monitor-Blunter - MBDS. La conducta del niño será evaluada mediante la versión brasileña de la escala VENHAM y el dolor será evaluado mediante la Faces Pain Scale – Revised (FPS-R) y la Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability (FLACC). El nivel de cortisol se evaluará antes y después del procedimiento, a través de saliva no estimulada. El estrés del odontólogo se evaluará mediante la escala analógica visual (EVA). Dados los resultados contradictorios sobre los beneficios de la anestesia computarizada en la literatura, se cree que los resultados ayudarán a definir la mejor estrategia para reducir la percepción del dolor, la ansiedad y el comportamiento.
Citas
Allen, K. D., Kotil, D., Larzelere, R. E., Hutfless, S., & Beiraghi, S. (2002). Comparison of a computerized anesthesia device with a traditional syringe in preschool children. Pediatric Dentistry, 24(4).
Amoudi, N. Al, Feda, M., Sharaf, A., Hanno, A., & Farsi, N. (2008). Assessment of the anesthetic effectiveness of anterior and middle superior alveolar injection using a computerized device versus traditional technique in children. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.33.2.d666m2l43334274p
Asarch, T., Allen, K., Petersen, B., & Beiraghi, S. (1999). Efficacy of a computerized local anesthesia device in pediatric dentistry. Pediatric Dentistry, 21(7).
Baghdadi, Z. D. (1999). Evaluation of electronic dental anesthesia in children. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics, 88(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70055-7
Baghlaf, K., Alamoudi, N. M., Elashiry, E., Farsi, N., El Derwi, D. A., & Abdullah, A. M. (2015). The pain-related behavior and pain perception associated with computerized anesthesia in pulpotomies of mandibular primary molars: A randomized controlled trial. Quintessence International, 46(9). https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a34553
Barlow, D. H. (2002). The nature of anxious apprehension. In Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treatment of anxiety and panic (Vol. 704).
Berrendero, S., Hriptulova, O., Salido, M. P., Martínez-Rus, F., & Pradíes, G. (2021). “Comparative study of conventional anesthesia technique versus computerized system anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial.” Clinical Oral Investigations, 25(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03553-5
Bieri, D., Reeve, R. A., Champion, D. G., Addicoat, L., & Ziegler, J. B. (1990). The faces pain scale for the self-assessment of the severity of pain experienced by children: Development, initial validation, and preliminary investigation for ratio scale properties. Pain, 41(2), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(90)90018-9
Cademartori, M. G., Da Rosa, D. P., Oliveira, L. J. C., Corrêa, M. B., & Goettems, M. L. (2017). Validity of the Brazilian version of the Venham’s behavior rating scale. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12231
Cademartori, M. G., Martins, P., Romano, A. R., & Goettems, M. L. (2017). Behavioral changes during dental appointments in children having tooth extractions. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_195_16
Da Silva, F. C., & Thuler, L. C. S. (2008). Cross-cultural adaptation and translation of two pain assessment tools in children and adolescents. Jornal de Pediatria, 84(4). https://doi.org/10.2223/JPED.1809
Deepak, V., Challa, R., Kamatham, R., & Nuvvula, S. (2017). Comparison of a new auto-controlled injection system with traditional syringe for mandibular infiltrations in children: A randomized clinical trial. Anesthesia: Essays and Researches, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.194535
Elbay, Ü. Ş., Elbay, M., Kaya, E., & Cilasun, Ü. (2016). Intraligamentary and supraperiosteal anesthesia efficacy using a computer controlled delivery system in mandibular molars. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 40(3). https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4628-40.3.193
Feda, M., Amoudi, N. Al, Sharaf, A., Hanno, A., Farsi, N., Masoud, I., & Almushyt, A. (2010). A comparative study of children’s pain reactions and perceptions to AMSA injection using CCLAD versus traditional injections. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.34.3.3201l74255560520
França, A. J. B. de, Barbirato, D. da S., Vasconcellos, R. J. de H., Pellizzer, E. P., Moraes, S. L. D. de, & Vasconcelos, B. C. do E. (2022). Do Computerized Delivery Systems Promote Less Pain and Anxiety Compared to Traditional Local Anesthesia in Dental Procedures? A Systematic Review of the Literature. In Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Vol. 80, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2021.11.018
Gadicherla, S., Shenoy, R. P., Patel, B., Ray, M., Naik, B., & Pentapati, K. C. (2018). Estimation of salivary cortisol among subjects undergoing dental extraction. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.54369
Garret-Bernardin, A., Cantile, T., D’Antò, V., Galanakis, A., Fauxpoint, G., Ferrazzano, G. F., De Rosa, S., Vallogini, G., Romeo, U., & Galeotti, A. (2017). Pain experience and behavior management in pediatric dentistry: A comparison between traditional local anesthesia and the wand computerized delivery system. Pain Research and Management, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7941238
Helmy, R. H., Zeitoun, S. I., & El-Habashy, L. M. (2022). Computer-controlled Intraligamentary local anaesthesia in extraction of mandibular primary molars: randomised controlled clinical Trial. BMC oral health, 22(1), 194. http:∕∕doi.org∕10.1186∕s12903-022-02194-2
Hicks, C. L., Von Baeyer, C. L., Spafford, P. A., Van Korlaar, I., & Goodenough, B. (2001). The Faces Pain Scale - Revised: Toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement. Pain, 93(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00314-1
Hochman, M., Chiarello, D., Hochman, C. B., Lopatkin, R., & Pergola, S. (1997). Computerized local anesthetic delivery vs. traditional syringe technique. Subjective pain response. The New York State Dental Journal, 63(7).
Kandiah, P., & Tahmassebi, J. F. (2012). Comparing the onset of maxillary infiltration local anaesthesia and pain experience using the conventional technique vs. the Wand in children. British Dental Journal, 213(9). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.988
Langthasa, M., Yeluri, R., Jain, A. A., & Munshi, A. K. (2012). Comparison of the pain perception in children using comfort control syringe and a conventional injection technique during pediatric dental procedures. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, 30(4). https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.108931
Lin, J., Zhao, H., Shen, J., & Jiao, F. (2017). Salivary Cortisol Levels Predict Therapeutic Response to a Sleep-Promoting Method in Children with Postural Tachycardia Syndrome. Journal of Pediatrics, 191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.08.039
Malamed SF. (2013) Handbook of Local Anesthesia-sixth edition. Elsevier. 314 p., Elsevier (2013).
Mathias, F. B., Cademartori, M. G., & Goettems, M. L. (2020). Factors associated with children’s perception of pain following dental treatment. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-019-00456-2
Meechan, J. G., Howlett, P. C., & Smith, B. D. (2005). Factors influencing the discomfort of intraoral needle penetration. Anesthesia Progress, 52(3). https://doi.org/10.2344/0003-3006(2005)52[91:FITDOI]2.0.CO;2
Merkel, S. I., Voepel-Lewis, T., Shayevitz, J. R., & Malviya, S. (1997). The FLACC: a behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children. Pediatric Nursing, 23(3).
Miller, S. M. (1987). Monitoring and blunting: Validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(2). https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.52.2.345
Mitchell, A. M., Crane, P. A., & Kim, Y. (2008). Perceived stress in survivors of suicide: Psychometric properties of the perceived stress scale. Research in Nursing and Health, 31(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20284
Mittal, M., Kumar, A., Srivastava, D., Sharma, P., & Sharma, S. (2015). Pain Perception: Computerized versus Traditional Local Anesthesia in Pediatric Patients. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 39(5), 470–474. https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4628-39.5.470
Muzumdar, P. G., Bendgude, V., & Mathur, A. (2021). Comparative evaluation of pain related behavior during administration of local anesthesia using the conventional syringe and the computerized controlled local anesthetic device in children exhibiting different levels of anxiety: In vivo study. Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International, 33(41A), 285-294. http://doi.org/10.9734/jpri/v33i41A32328
Nabwera, H. M., Bernstein, R. M., Agbla, S. C., Moore, S. E., Darboe, M. K., Colley, M., Jallow, A. T., Bradbury, R., Karafin, J., Fulford, A. J., & Prentice, A. M. (2018). Hormonal correlates and predictors of nutritional recovery in Malnourished African Children. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, 64(5). https://doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fmx075
Palm, A. M., Kirkegaard, U., & Poulsen, S. (2004). The Wand versus traditional injection for mandibular nerve block in children and adolescents: Perceived pain and time of onset. Pediatric Dentistry, 26(6).
Queiroz, A. M., Carvalho, A. B., Censi, L. L., Cardoso, C. L., Leite-Panissi, C. R., da Silva, R. A. B., de Carvalho, F. K., Nelson-Filho, P., & da Silva, L. A. B. (2015). Stress and anxiety in children after the use of computerized dental anesthesia. Brazilian Dental Journal, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201300211
Ramos-Jorge, M. L., Marques, L. S., Pavia, S. M., Serra-Negra, J. M., & Pordeus, I. A. (2006). Predictive factors for child behaviour in the dental environment. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry : Official Journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03262561
Salameh, E., Alshaarani, F., Hamed, H. A., & Nassar, J. A. (2015). Investigation of the relationship between psychosocial stress and temporomandibular disorder in adults by measuring salivary cortisol concentration: A case-control study. Journal of Indian Prosthodontist Society, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.158075
Shetty, S., Dalvi, S., Katge, F., Patil, D., Chimata, V. K., & Shetty, A. (2022). Comparison of pain perception between computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery and the conventional syringe for inferior alveolar nerve block in children. Dental and medical problems, 59(4), 523-529. http://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/135897
Skrinjar, I., Vidranski, V., Brzak, B. L., Juras, D. V., Rogulj, A. A., Brailo, V., & Boras, V. V. (2019). Salivary cortisol levels in patients with oral lichen planus - A pilot case-control study. Dentistry Journal, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/dj7020059
Smaïl-Faugeron, V., Muller-Bolla, M., Sixou, J. L., & Courson, F. (2015). Split-mouth and parallel-arm trials to compare pain with intraosseous anaesthesia delivered by the computerised Quicksleeper system and conventional infiltration anaesthesia in paediatric oral healthcare: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 5(7). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007724
Smaïl-Faugeron, V., Muller-Bolla, M., Sixou, J. L., & Courson, F. (2019). Evaluation of intraosseous computerized injection system (QuickSleeperTM) vs conventional infiltration anaesthesia in paediatric oral health care: A multicentre, single-blind, combined split-mouth and parallel-arm randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 29(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12494
Smolarek, P. de C., da Silva, L. S., Martins, P. R. D., Hartman, K. da C., Bortoluzzi, M. C., & Chibinski, A. C. R. (2020). Evaluation of pain, disruptive behaviour and anxiety in children aging 5-8 years old undergoing different modalities of local anaesthetic injection for dental treatment: a randomised clinical trial. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 78(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2020.1757752
Spielberger, C. D. (1972). Anxiety as an emotional state. In Anxiety. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-657401-2.50009-5
Tahmassebi, J. F., Nikolaou, M., & Duggal, M. S. (2009). A comparison of pain and anxiety associated with the administration of maxillary local analgesia with Wand and conventional technique. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry : Official Journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03321604
Versloot, J., Veerkamp, J. S. J., & Hoogstraten, J. (2005). Computerized anesthesia delivery system vs. traditional syringe: Comparing pain and pain-related behavior in children. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 113(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2005.00252.x
Willis, M. H. W., Merkel, S. I., Voepel-Lewis, T., & Malviya, S. (2003). FLACC Behavioral Pain Assessment Scale: a comparison with the child’s self-report. Pediatric Nursing, 29(3).
Zhu, Y., Chen, X., Zhao, H., Chen, M., Tian, Y., Liu, C., Han, Z. R., Lin, X., Qiu, J., Xue, G., Shu, H., & Qin, S. (2019). Socioeconomic status disparities affect children’s anxiety and stress-sensitive cortisol awakening response through parental anxiety. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 103, 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.01.008
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Fernanda Vieira Almeida; Giulia Tarquinio Demarco; Mariana Gonzalez Cademartori; Marina Sousa Azevedo; Marília Leão Goettems; Flávio Fernando Demarco
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Los autores que publican en esta revista concuerdan con los siguientes términos:
1) Los autores mantienen los derechos de autor y conceden a la revista el derecho de primera publicación, con el trabajo simultáneamente licenciado bajo la Licencia Creative Commons Attribution que permite el compartir el trabajo con reconocimiento de la autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista.
2) Los autores tienen autorización para asumir contratos adicionales por separado, para distribución no exclusiva de la versión del trabajo publicada en esta revista (por ejemplo, publicar en repositorio institucional o como capítulo de libro), con reconocimiento de autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista.
3) Los autores tienen permiso y son estimulados a publicar y distribuir su trabajo en línea (por ejemplo, en repositorios institucionales o en su página personal) a cualquier punto antes o durante el proceso editorial, ya que esto puede generar cambios productivos, así como aumentar el impacto y la cita del trabajo publicado.
