Innovative Teachers: paradigm shifts based on the needs presented by students

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i7.4428

Keywords:

Innovative Teachers; Training; Students.

Abstract

This research is the product of a research on innovative practices developed at the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Ceará (IFCE), methodological innovations gravitate around the use of technologies, gamification, simulation of professional daily life, among other categories. We aim to highlight training processes stimulated by students, based on teachers' speeches that bring together the innovation of pedagogical practices supported by the needs highlighted by students. We base our reflections on the discourse of 19 teachers who claim to have initiated the innovations based on the needs and demands of students, the student being an important and integral part in the process of teaching, learning and teacher training. The analyses were carried out based on microanalysis and as a collection tool the online questionnaire was used, this process was conducted in the light of qualitative research. Significant changes were noted in the spaces and in the construction of actions aimed at moments of lucid learning, close to reality that progressively deconstruct practices disconnected from the contexts of the students.

References

Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Chizzotti, A. (1998). Pesquisa em ciências humanas e sociais. São Paulo: Cortez.

Fernandes, A. C. A; Silva, Katia A G.S, Silva, F. S; Braga, C. B & Lopes, L. F. O (2019). Discurso coletivo sobre práticas pedagógicas inovadoras: Percepções de professores de um instituto federal de ensino superior. Revista Revelli, v. 11.

Filatro, A. (2018). Metodologias inov-ativas na educação presencial, a distância e corporativa. São Paulo: Saraiva Educação.

Freire, P. (2005). Pedagogia do oprimido. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Paz e Terra.

Gatti, B. A.. (2019). Professores do Brasil: Novos cenários de formação. Brasília: Unesco.

Giraffa, L. M. M. (2012). Docentes analógicos e alunos da geração digital: Desafios e possibilidades na escola do século XXI. Reinvenção Pedagógica?: Reflexões acerca do uso de tecnologias digitais na educação.

IBGE. (2017). Pesquisa nacional por amostra de domicílios contínua.

Mattar, J. (2010). Games em educação: Como os nativos digitais aprendem. São Paulo: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Padilha, P. R. … [et al.] (org.) (2019). 50 olhares sobre os 50 anos da pedagogia do oprimido. São Paulo: Instituto Paulo Freire.

Prensky, M. (2005). Escute os nativos. Liderança educacional, 63(4), pp. 8-13.

Rego, T. C. (1995). Vygotsky: Uma perspectiva histórico-cultural da educação. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes.

Saviani, D. (2011). Pedagogia histórico-crítica: Primeiras aproximações. 11. ed. rev. Campinas, SP: Autores Associados.

Scanlon, E. & Issroff, K. (2005). Activity theory and higher education: Evaluating learning technologies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, v. 21, pp. 430-439.

Strauss, A. & Corbin, J.. (2008). Pesquisa qualitativa: Técnicas e procedimentos para o desenvolvimento da teoria fundamentada. (2008). 2.ed. Porto Alegre, RS: Artmed.

Tardif, M. (2014). Saberes docentes e formação profissional. 17.ed. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes.

Published

29/05/2020

How to Cite

ALMEIDA, A. C. F. de; LOPES, L. F. de O.; BRAGA, C. B. Innovative Teachers: paradigm shifts based on the needs presented by students. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 7, p. e576974428, 2020. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v9i7.4428. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/4428. Acesso em: 28 apr. 2024.

Issue

Section

Education Sciences