A Actividad pesquera en la Plataforma Marítima de Pesca Amadora en Mongaguá (Brasil), Atlántico Suroeste
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i9.8020Palabras clave:
Pesca deportiva; Ordenación pesquera; . Conservación; Servicios ecosistémicos culturales; Sistemas socioecológicosResumen
El presente estudio tuvo como objetivo caracterizar los aspectos pesqueros y socioeconómicos de los pescadores deportivos en la Plataforma Marítima de Pesca Amadora de Mongaguá (São Paulo, Brasil), Suroeste Atlántico Sur. Los datos fueron recolectados a través de entrevistas y muestras fueron identificadas, pesadas y Medido. Se entrevistaron 114 pescadores, predominantemente hombres, con una edad promedio de 51 (SD ±13,5) años, entre diciembre de 2012 y agosto de 2016. Las pesquerías grupales duraron 8,2 (± 4,8) horas, con una captura media de 9,4 (± 11,8) peces / pescador / día y 1,9 ± 3,5 kg / día / pescador. La captura media anual de 30.120 (± 23.177), superior al 40% de la pesca comercial desembarcada en el municipio, en el mismo período (65.145,9 ±16.575,7 kg). La especie más buscada fue Trichiurus lepturus (pez espada), aunque las más capturadas fueron el bagre (familia Ariidae). Fue posible registrar diferentes combinaciones de técnicas, dispositivos y cebos para capturar especies con diferentes preferencias de hábitat debajo de la plataforma. Los pescadores deportivos señalaron problemas relacionados con la infraestructura, conflictos con la pesca comercial y los surfistas, así como problemas ecológicos relacionados con la reducción del tamaño de los peces capturados. Recomendamos medidas de gestión integral que consideren los grupos sociales involucrados, así como la sostenibilidad de la actividad.
Citas
Aas,Ø. (2002). The next chapter: multicultural and cross-disciplinary progress in evaluating recreational fisheries. In Recreational Fisheries: Ecological, Economic and Social Evaluation, (pp 252-263). UK: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470995402.ch17.
Alho, C. J. R. & Reis, R. E. (2017). Exposure of Fishery Resources to Environmental and Socioeconomic Threats within the Pantanal Wetland of South America. International Journal of Aquaculture and Fishery Sciences, 3(2), 022-029. doi: 10.17352/2455-8400.000024.
Annis, G.M.; Pearsall, D.R.; Kahl, K.J.; Washburn, E.L.; May, C.A.; Taylor, R.F.; Cole, J.B… Doran, P.J. (2017) Designing coastal conservation to deliver ecosystem and human well-being benefits. PLoS ONE 12(2): e0172458. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172458.
Anon. (2015) Bíblia do pescador: O anuário brasileiro de estudo da pesca esportiva. Editora Um, São Paulo. 400p.
Arlinghaus, R. (2006) Overcoming human obstacles to conservation of recreational fishery resources, with emphasis on central Europe. Environmental Conservation, 33(1), 6-59. doi:10.1017/S0376892906002700.
Arlinghaus, R.; Mehner, T. & Cowx, I. G. (2002). Reconciling traditional inland fisheries management and sustainability in industrialized countries, with emphasis on Europe. Fish and Fisheries, 3, 261-316. doi:10.1046/j.1467-2979.2002.00102.x.
Arlinghaus, R.; Alós, J.; Beardmore, B.; Daedlow, K.; Dorow, M.; Fujitani, M., … Wolter, C. (2016). Understanding and Managing Freshwater Recreational Fisheries as Complex Adaptive Social-Ecological Systems. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture, 25(1), 1–41. doi:10.1080/23308249.2016.1209160.
Australian Recreational Fishing Advisory Committee. (2011). Recreational fishing in Australia - 2011 and beyond: national industry development strategy. Commonwealth of Australia. Recuperado de https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/sitecollectiondocuments/fisheries/recreational/rec-fishing-june2011.pdf. Acesso em 11/09/2020.
Barrella, W.; Ramires, M.; Rotundo, M. M.; Petrere Jr, M. Clauzet, M. & Giordano, F. (2016). Biological and socio-economic aspects of recreational fisheries and their implications for the management of coastal urban areas of south-eastern Brazil. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 23(3-4), 303-314. doi:10.1111/fme.12173.
Basaglia, T.P. & Vieira, J.P. (2005). Recreational Fishing at Cassino Beach, Southern Brazil: The need of ecological information associated to target species. Braz. J. Aquat. Sci. Technol. 9(1), 25-29. doi: 10.14210/bjast.v9n1.p25-29.
Bennett, N. J.; Roth, R.; Klain, S. C.; Chan, K.; Christie, P.; Clark, D. A., … Wyborn, C. (2017). Conservation social science: Understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation. Biological Conservation, 205, 93–108.
doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.006.
Bodin, O. (2017). Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science, 357, 659. doi:10.1126/science.aan1114.
Boucquey, N. (2017). “That”s my livelihood, it’s your fun’: The conflicting moral economies of commercial and recreational fishing. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 138–150. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.018.
Bower, S. D.; Danylchuk, A. J.; Raghavan, R.; Danylchuk, S. C.; Pinder, A. C.; Alter, A. M., & Cooke, S. J. (2017). Involving recreational fisheries stakeholders in development of research and conservation priorities for mahseer (Tor spp.) of India through collaborative workshops. Fisheries research, 186, 665-671. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2016.05.011.
Brasil, Ministério do turismo. (2010). Turismo de Pesca: Orientações Básicas. Brasília: Ministério do turismo. Recuperado de
http://www.turismo.gov.br/sites/default/turismo/o_ministerio/publicacoes/downloads_publicacoes/Turismo_de_Pesca_Versxo_Final_IMPRESSxO_.pdf. Acesso em 11/09/2020.
Brinson, A.A., & Wallmo, K. (2017). Determinants of Saltwater Anglers’ Satisfaction with Fisheries Management: Regional Perspectives in the United States. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 37(1), 225-234. doi:10.1080/02755947.2016.1235629.
Brown, E, J.; Vasconcelos, R.P.; Wennhage, H.; Bergström, U.; Støttrup, J.G.; Wolfshaar, K.; Millisenda, G.; Colloca, F. & Le Pape, O. (2018). Conflicts in the coastal zone: human impacts on commercially important fish species utilizing coastal habitat. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 75(4): 1203-1213. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsx237.
Camp, E. V.: Ahrens, R. N. M.: Crandall, C. & Lorenzen, K. (2018). Angler travel distances: Implications for spatial approaches to marine recreational fisheries governance. Marine Policy, 87, 263–274. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2017.10.003.
Carpenter, K.E. (2002). FAO species identification sheets for fishery purposes: The living marine resources of the Western Central Atlantic (fishing area 31). Roma: FAO, v.1-3.
Carpenter, S. R.; Brock, W. A.; Hansen, G. J.; Hansen, J. F.; Hennessy, J. M.; Isermann, D. A., ... & Tunney, T. D. (2017). Defining a Safe Operating Space for inland recreational fisheries. Fish and Fisheries, 18(6), 1150-1160.
Catella, A.C. (2003). A Pesca no Pantanal Sul: situação atual e perspectivas. Corumbá: Embrapa Pantanal. Recuperado de https://www.embrapa.br/busca-de-publicacoes/ /publicacao/799005/a-pesca-no-pantanal-sul-situacao-atual-e-perspectivas.
Acesso em 11/09/2020.
Chi, J. & Chi, Y.N. (2006). Profiling saltwater recreational anglers toward the threats of marine environment. International Journal of Management and Sustainability, 7(2), 72‑82. doi:10.18488/journal.11.2018.72.72.82.
Cisneros-Montemayor, A. M.; Harper, S., & Tai, T. C. (2018). The market and shadow value of informal fish catch: a framework and application to Panama. Natural Resources Forum, 42(2), 83–92. doi:10.1111/1477-8947.12143.
Cole, V. J.; Chick, R. C. & Hutchings, P. A. (2018). A review of global fisheries for polychaete worms as a resource for recreational fishers: diversity, sustainability and research needs. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 28(3): 543-556. doi:10.1007/s11160-018-9523-4.
Cooke, S. & Cowx, I.G (2006). Contrasting recreational and commercial fishing: searching for common issues to promote unified conservation of fisheries resources and aquatic environments. Biological Conservation, 128 (1): 93 108.
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.019.
Cooke, S. J.; Cowx, I.G. & Schramm, H.L. (2007). Catch-and-release science and its application to conservation and management of recreational fisheries. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 14(3): 73-79. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2400.2007.00527.x.
Cowan Jr, J.H. & Rose, K.A., (2016) Oil and Gas Platforms in the Gulf of Mexico: Their Relationship to Fish and Fisheries, Fisheries and Aquaculture in the Modern World. In: Fisheries and Aquaculture in the Modern World, (pp 95-122). Ed. by H. Mikkola, UK: InTech. doi: 10.5772/63026.
Dianno, M.V. (2007). Mongaguá: História da minha cidade. São Paulo: Ed. Do autor. 256pp.
Eschmeyer, W.N.; Fricke, R. & Van Der Laan, R. (2017). Catalog of Fishes: Genera, Species, References. Online Version. Recuperado de: http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp. Acesso em 11/09/2020.
FAO. (2012). Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries: Recreational Fisheries. Roma: FAO. 176pp. Recuperado de http://www.fao.org/3/i2708e/i2708e00.htm. Acesso em 11/09/2020.
FAO. (2013). Fisheries and Aquaculture Statistics Recreational Fisheries. Roma: FAO. 233pp. Recuperado de https://www.agriculture.gov.au/abares/research-topics/fisheries/fisheries-and-aquaculture-statistics. Acesso em 11/09/2020.
Ferter, K.; Weltersbach, M.S.; Humborstad. O.; Fjelldal, P. G.; Sambraus, F.; Strehlow, H.V. & Vølstad, J. H. (2015). Dive to survive: effects of capture depth on barotrauma and post-release survival of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) in recreational fisheries. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72(8), 2467-2481. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsv102.
Figueiredo, J.L. & Menezes, N.A. (1978). Manual de Peixes marinhos do sudeste do Brasil. 2 Teleostei (1). São Paulo: Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo. 110p.
Figueiredo, J.L. & Menezes, N.A. (1980). Manual de peixes marinhos do sudeste do Brasil. 3 Teleostei (2). São Paulo: Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo. 90p.
Figueiredo, J.L. & Menezes, N.A. (2000). Manual de peixes marinhos do sudeste do Brasil.6 Teleostei (5). São Paulo: Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo. 116p.
Fischer, L.G.; Pereira, L.E.D. & Vieira, J.P. (2004). Peixes estuarinos e costeiros: Série Biodiversidade do Atlântico Sudoeste 01. Rio Grande: Editora Coscientia. 127p.
Fisher, E.; Bavinck, M. & Amsalu. A. (2018) Transforming asymmetrical conflicts over natural resources in the Global South. Ecology and Society, 23(4), 28. . doi: 10.5751/ES-10386-230428
Fontaine, C. (2017) Asian Australian Cultures of Recreational Fishing, Honours Degree of Bachelor of Science - Human Geography, Geography and Sustainable Communities, AU: University of Wollongong. Recuperado de
https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=thss. Acesso em 11/09/2020.
Freire, K.M.F.; Machado, M.L. & Crepaldi, D. (2012). Overview of Inland Recreational Fisheries in Brazil. Fisheries, 37 (11), 484-494. doi:10.1080/03632415.2012.731867.
Freire, K.M.F.; Tubino, R.A.; Monteiro-Neto, C.; Andrade-Tubino, M.F.; Belruss, C. G.; Tomás A.R.G.; Tutui, L.S., Castro, P.M.G.; Maruyama, L.S.; Catella, A.C.; Crepaldi, D.V.;
Daniel, C.R.A.; Machado, M. L.; Mendonça, J.T.; Moro, P.S.; Motta, F.S.; Ramires, M.; Silva M. H. C. & Vieira, J. P. (2016). Brazilian recreational fisheries: current status, challenges and future direction. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 23(3-4), 276-290. https://doi.org/10.1111/fme.12171.
Froese, R. (2004). Keep it simple: three indicators to deal with overfishing. Fish and Fisheries, 5(1), 86-91. Recuperado de https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11897517.pdf. Acesso em 11/09/2020.
Froese R. & Pauly D. (2015). FishBase. Versão 7/2017. Disponível em: . Acesso em 12 jun. 2018.
García-Llorente, M.; Harrison, P. A.; Berry, P.; Palomo, I.; Gómez-Baggethun, E.; Iniesta-Arandia, I… Martín-López, B. (2016). What can conservation strategies learn from the ecosystem services approach? Insights from ecosystem assessments in two Spanish protected areas. Biodiversity and Conservation, 27(7), 1575–1597. doi: 10.1007/s10531-016-1152-4.
Giovos, I.; Keramidas, I.; Antoniou, C.; Deidun, A.; Font, T.; Kleitou, P.; Lloret J.; Matić-Skok S.; Said, A.; Tiralongo, F. & Moutopoulos, D. K. (2018). Identifying recreational fisheries in the Mediterranean Sea through social media. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 25(4), 287–295. doi: 10.1111/fme.12293.
Gordoa, A.; Dedeu, A. L.; & Boada, J. (2019). Recreational fishing in Spain: First national estimates of fisher population size, fishing activity and fisher social profile. Fisheries Research, 211, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2018.10.026.
Hadley, J. A. (2012) Social and Economic Profile of Ocean Fishing Piers in North Carolina. US: North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality. E
Recuperado de https://digital.ncdcr.gov/digital/collection/p16062coll9/id/253883. Acesso em 11/09/2020.
Hanazaki N.; Castro F.D.; Oliveira V.G. & Peroni N. (2007). Between the sea and the land: the livelihood of estuarine people in southeastern Brazil. Ambiente e Sociedade, 10(1), 121-136. doi:10.1590/S1414-753X2007000100008.
Hughes, R. M. (2015). Recreational fisheries in the USA: economics, management strategies, and ecological threats. FishSci, 81, 1-9. doi:10.1007/s12562-014-0815-x.
Hunt, L. M. (2005). Recreational Fishing Site Choice Models: Insights and Future Opportunities. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 10(3), 153–172.
doi:10.1080/10871200591003409.
Hunt, L. M.; Arlinghaus, R.; Lester, N., & Kushneriuk, R. (2011). The effects of regional angling effort, angler behavior, and harvesting efficiency on landscape patterns of overfishing. Ecological Applications, 21(1), 2555-2575. doi:10.1890/10-1237.1.
Hutubessy, M. & Hayward, J.W.P. (2017). Small is beautiful: Marine small-scale fisheries catches from the South-West Maluku Regency. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. doi :10.1088/1755-1315/89/1/012003.
Hyder, K.; Weltersbach, M. S.; Armstrong, M.; Ferter, K.; Townhill, B.; Ahvonen, A., … Birzaks, J. (2017). Recreational sea fishing in Europe in a global context-Participation rates, fishing effort, expenditure, and implications for monitoring and assessment. Fish and Fisheries, 19(2), 225–243. doi:10.1111/faf.12251
Instituto de Pesca. 2016. A Pesca em Mongaguá. Disponível em: http://www.propesq.pesca.sp.gov.br/26/conteudo. Acessado em: 19 jun. 2017, 19:38.
Jones, A. R.; Schlacher, T. A.; Schoeman, D. S.; Weston, M. A., & Withycombe, G. M. (2017). Ecological research questions to inform policy and the management of sandy beaches. Ocean & Coastal Management, 148, 158–163. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.07.020.
Klinger, D.H.; Eikeset, A.M.; Davisdottir, B.; Winter, A.M., & Watson, J.R. (2018). The mechanics of the blue growth: managing the use of natural resources with oceanic multiple sectors of interaction. Marine Policy, 87, 356-362. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2017.09.025
Lang, T. 2014. The Role of Hatcheries in Ensuring Social and Economic Benefits of Fisheries in the United States. Fisheries, 39 (11), 556-557. doi:10.1080/03632415.2014.966091.
Lennox, R. J.; Alós, J.; Arlinghaus, R.; Horodysky, A.; Klefoth, T.; Monk, C. T. & Cooke, S. J. (2017). What makes fish vulnerable to capture by hooks? A conceptual framework and a review of key determinants. Fish and Fisheries, 18(5), 986-1010. doi:10.1111/faf.12219.
Lewin, W. C.; Strehlow, H. V.; Ferter, K.; Hyder, K.; Niemax, J.; Herrmann, J. P. & Weltersbach, M.S. (2018). Estimating post-release mortality of European sea bass based on experimental angling. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 75(4), 1483-1495. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsx240.
Lewis, S.D.; Braun, A.S. & Fountoura N.F. (2001). Relative seasonal fish abundance caught by recreational fisheries on Cidreira Pier, southern Brazil. Fisheries Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 15(3),149-151. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0426.1999.00134.x.
Lloret, J.; Cowx, I. G.; Cabral, H.; Castro, M.; Font, T.; Gonçalves, J. M. S., … Erzini, K. (2016). Small-scale coastal fisheries in European Seas are not what they were: Ecological, social and economic changes. Marine Policy, 98, 176-186. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2016.11.007.
Lök, A.; Metin, C.; Ulas A.; Düzbastilar F.O. & Tokaç, A. (2012). Artificial reefs in Turkey. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 59, 192-195. doi:10.1006/jmsc.2002.1221.
Løkkeborg, S.; Siikavuopio, S. I.; Humborstad, O. B.; Utne-Palm, A. C., & Ferter, K. (2014). Towards more efficient longline fisheries: fish feeding behaviour, bait characteristics and development of alternative baits. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 24(4), 985-1003. doi:10.1007/s11160-014-9360-z.
Lynch, A. J.; Cooke, S. J.; Beard Jr, T. D.; Kao, Y. C.; Lorenzen, K.; Song, A. M., ... & Cowx, I. G. (2017). Grand challenges in the management and conservation of North American inland fishes and fisheries. Fisheries, 42(2), 115-124. doi:10.1080/03632415.2017.1259945.
Marceniuk, A.P. (2005). Chave para a identificação das espécies de bagres marinhos (Siluriformes, Ariidae) da Costa Brasileira. Boletim do Instituto de Pesca, 31 (2): 89-101.
Martin, S. L.; Ballance, L. T., & Groves, T. (2016). An Ecosystem Services Perspective for the Oceanic Eastern Tropical Pacific: Commercial Fisheries, Carbon Storage, Recreational Fishing, and Biodiversity. Frontiers in Marine Science, 3. doi:10.3389/fmars.2016.00050.
Menezes, N.A. & Figueiredo, J.L. (1980). Manual de peixes marinhos do sudeste do Brasil. IV. Teleostei (3). São Paulo: Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo. 96 p.
Menezes, N.A. & Figueiredo, J.L. (1985). Manual de peixes marinhos do sudeste do Brasil. V. Teleostei (4). São Paulo: Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo. 105 p.
Menezes, N.A.; Buckup, P.A., Figueiredo, J.L.; Moura, R.L. (2003). Catálogo das espécies de peixes marinhos do Brasil. São Paulo: Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo. 159 p.
Morgera, E. & Ntona, M. (2018). Linking small-scale fisheries to international obligations on marine technology transfer. Marine Policy, 93, 295-306. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2017.07.021.
Motta, F.S.; Mendonça, J.T. & Moro, P.S. (2016). Collaborative assessment of recreational fishing in a subtropical estuarine system: a case study with fishing guides from south-eastern Brazil. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 23 (3-4):1-13. doi:10.1111/fme.12172
Nelson, J.S.; Grande, T.C. & Wilson, M.V. (2016). Fishes of the World. US: John Wiley & Sons. p. 707.
Novaglio, C.; Smith, A. D. M.; Frusher, S.; Ferretti, F., Klaer, N., & Fulton, E. A. (2018). Fishery Development and Exploitation in South East Australia. Frontiers in Marine Science, 5. doi:10.3389/fmars.2018.00145.
O’toole, A, C.; Danylchuk, A, J.; Suski, C.D. & Cooke, S. J. (2010). Consequences of catch-and-release angling on the physiological status, injury, and immediate mortality of great barracuda (Sphyraena barracuda) in The Bahamas. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 67 (8): 1667-1675. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsq090
Oliveira, R.M. (2011). Avaliação dos Benefícios Gerados com a Recuperação da Plataforma de Pesca, Lazer e Turismo de Mongaguá-SP ao Desenvolvimento Turístico da Cidade. Monografia, Rosana: Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, 60 p.
Pascual, U.; Balvanera, P.; Díaz, S.; Pataki, G.; Roth, E.; Stenseke, M., ... & Maris, V. (2017). Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26, 7-16. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006
Peixer, J. & Petrere Jr. M. 2009. Sport fishing in Mogi-Guaçu River, State of São Paulo, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 9(64), 1081- 1090. doi:10.1590/S1519-69842009000500011
Petrere Jr., M. (2014). Pesque e Solte: Proteção ou dano para os peixes? Ciência Hoje, 53:16–19. Recuperado em: https://cienciahoje.org.br/artigo/pesque-solte-lazer-ou-crueldade. Acesso em 11/09/2020.
Pinder, A,C.; Velterop, R.; Cooke, S. C. & Britton, J. R. (2017). Consequences of catch-and-release angling for black bream Spondyliosom acantharus, during the parental care period: implications for management. ICES Journal of Marine Science,74(1), 254-262. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsw151.
Pita, P.; Hyder, K.; Gomes, P.; Pita, C.; Rangel, M.; Veiga, P., … Villasante, S. (2018). Economic, social and ecological attributes of marine recreational fisheries in Galicia, Spain. Fisheries Research, 208, 58–69. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2018.07.014.
Qiu, J.; Game, E. T.; Tallis, H.; Olander, L. P.; Glew, L.; Kagan, J. S., ... & Reed, J. (2018). Evidence-based causal chains for linking health, development, and conservation actions. BioScience, 68(3), 182-193. doi:org/10.1093/biosci/bix167
Radford, Z.; Hyder, K.; Zaraus, L.; Mugerza, E.; Ferter, K.; Prellezo, R.; Strehlow, H. V.; Townhill, B.; Lewin, W. & Weltersbach, M.S. (2018). The impact of marine recreational fishing on key fish stocks in European waters. PLoS ONE, 13(9), 1-16. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0201666.
Rees, E. M. A.; Edmonds-Brown, V. R.; Alam, F.M; Wright, R. M.; Britton J. R.; Davies, G.D.; Cowx, I. G. (2017). Socio-economic drivers of specialist anglers targeting the non-native European catfish (Silurus glanis) in the UK. PLoS ONE, 12(6), 1-13. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0178805
Reynolds, E. M.; Cowan, J. H., Lewis, K. A., & Simonsen, K. A. (2018). Method for estimating relative abundance and species composition around oil and gas platforms in the northern Gulf of Mexico, USA. Fisheries Research, 201, 44-55. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2018.01.00
Sant’anna. D.V. (2011) A pesca amadora em plataformas de pesca do litoral norte do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Monografia. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Recuperado em: https://lume.ufrgs.br/handle/10183/40130. Acesso em 11/09/2020
Scholtens, J. & Bavinck M. (2018). Transforming conflicts from the bottom-up? Reflections on civil society efforts to empower marginalized fishers in postwar Sri Lanka. Ecology and Society 23(3), 31. doi: 10.5751/ES-10216-230331
Schork, G.; Mottola L.S.M. & Silva, M.H. (2010) Diagnóstico da pesca amadora embarcada na região de São Francisco do Sul (SC). Revista do CEPSUL, 1(1): 8-17. Recuperado em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277155005_Diagnostico_da_pesca_amadora_embarcada_na_regiao_de_Sao_Francisco_do_Sul_SC. Acesso em 11/09/2020.
Shrestha, R. K.; Seidl, A. F. & Moraes A.S. (2002). Value of recreational fishing in the Brazilian Pantanal: a travel cost analysis using count data models. Ecological Economics, 42 (1-2): 289-299. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00106-4
Silva, F. L.; Souza, T.R.; Molitzas, R.; Barrella, W. & Ramires, M. (2016). Aspectos socioeconômicos e etnoecológicos da pesca esportiva praticada na Vila Barra do Una, Peruíbe/SP. Unisanta Bioscience, 5(1), 129-142. Recuperado em: https://periodicos.unisanta.br/index.php/bio/article/view/646/680. Acesso em 11/09/2020.
Sinclair, M.; Ghermandi, A. & Sheela, A. M. (2018). A crowdsourced valuation of recreational ecosystem services using social media data: An application to a tropical wetland in India. Science of The Total Environment, 642, 356–365. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.056
Tsuruda, J.M.; Nascimento, R.B.; Barrella, W.; Ramires, M. & Rotundo, M.M. (2013). A pesca esportiva e o perfil socioeconômico na Ponta dos Galhetas, Praia das Astúrias, Guarujá/SP. Unisanta Bioscience, 2(1), 22-34. Recuperado em: https://periodicos.unisanta.br/index.php/bio/article/download/126/112. Acesso em 11/09/2020.
Vieira, J.C. & Antunes, M.C. (2017). Touristic big-game fishing in Saint Michael Island (Azores): Evaluating anglers’ profiles, perceptions about the destination and business revenues. Tourism Economics, 23(6), 1-7. doi:10.1177/1354816616686414.
Ware, D. (2017). Sustainable resolution of conflicts over coastal values: a case study of the Gold Coast Surf Management Plan. Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs, 9(1), 1-13. doi:10.1080/18366503.2017.1278501.
Weltersbach, M, S. & Strehlow, H, V. (2013). Dead or alive—estimating post-release mortality of Atlantic cod in the recreational fishery. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 70(4), 864-872. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fst038.
Zarauz, L.; Ruiz, J.; Urtizberea, A.; Andonegi, E.; Mugerza, E. & Artetxe, I. (2015) Comparing different survey methods to estimate European sea bass recreational catches in the Basque Country. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72(4), 1181-1191. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv054
Zenaid A.K. & Prado R.A. (2012). Peixes fluviais do Brasil. Campinas: Pescaventura, 360 p.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2020 Uelcio Jackson Magalhaes Alves Junior; Matheus Marcos Rotundo; Miguel Petrere Junior; Walter Barrellla; Milena Ramires
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Los autores que publican en esta revista concuerdan con los siguientes términos:
1) Los autores mantienen los derechos de autor y conceden a la revista el derecho de primera publicación, con el trabajo simultáneamente licenciado bajo la Licencia Creative Commons Attribution que permite el compartir el trabajo con reconocimiento de la autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista.
2) Los autores tienen autorización para asumir contratos adicionales por separado, para distribución no exclusiva de la versión del trabajo publicada en esta revista (por ejemplo, publicar en repositorio institucional o como capítulo de libro), con reconocimiento de autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista.
3) Los autores tienen permiso y son estimulados a publicar y distribuir su trabajo en línea (por ejemplo, en repositorios institucionales o en su página personal) a cualquier punto antes o durante el proceso editorial, ya que esto puede generar cambios productivos, así como aumentar el impacto y la cita del trabajo publicado.