Conformidade de ECRs em instrumentação endodôntica com a declaração CONSORT: Uma revisão sistemática
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i8.17350Palavras-chave:
Endodontia; Instrumentos odontológicos; Ensaios clínicos controlados aleatórios como assunto.Resumo
Esta revisão sistemática teve como objetivo avaliar a adesão à Declaração CONSORT em estudos clínicos comparando diferentes técnicas de instrumentação em Endodontia. Metodologia: Foi realizada uma busca sistemática nas bases de dados Medline. Não houve restrição quanto ao ano ou idioma de publicação. Apenas ensaios clínicos randomizados (ECRs) foram incluídos. Os artigos foram avaliados de acordo com o CONSORT. Análises descritivas do número de estudos por periódico, país e avaliações de qualidade foram realizadas com a ferramenta RoB 2.0 Cochrane Collaboration para avaliar o risco de viés em ECRs. Um total de 6.779 estudos foram identificados, e apenas 33 atendem aos critérios de elegibilidade. Em relação ao risco geral de viés, oito de 33 foram classificados como de risco "baixo" de viés. A pontuação geral CONSORT para os estudos incluídos nesta revisão foi de 22 ± 6,2 pontos. Foram observadas diferenças significativas entre os países (p = 0,03). O intervalo de anos teve influência significativa no escore CONSORT médio (p = 0,01). A adesão dos ECRs de instrumentação endodôntica à declaração CONSORT requer melhorias. A adesão à declaração CONSORT também reduzirá o risco elevado ou algumas preocupações de viés dos estudos na área. CRD42020160552
Referências
Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., Moherm D., Egger, M., Davidoff, F., Elbourne, D., Gøtzsche, P. C., Lang, T.; CONSORT GROUP (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) (2001) The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine 134(8), 663-694.
Aminsobhani, M., Meraji, N., Khoshdel, A., & Ghorbanzadeh, A. (2017) The Effect of Root Canal Preparation Using Single Versus Multiple Endodontic Rotary Files on Post-operative Pain, a Randomised Clinical Trial. European Endodontic Journal 2(1), 1-5.
Aqrabawi, J., & Jamani, K. (2006) Prevalence of post-treatment pain after cleaning and shaping of the root canal system using manual step-back versus rotary nickel titanium. Odonto-stomatologie Tropicale 29(113), 5-9.
Arias, A., de la Macorra, J. C., Azabal, M., Hidalgo, J. J., & Peters, O.A. (2015) Prospective case controlled clinical study of post-endodontic pain after rotary root canal preparation performed by a single operator. Journal of Dentistry 43(3), 389-395.
Arslan, H., Khalilov, R., Doanay, E., & Karatas, E. (2016) The effect of various kinematics on postoperative pain after instrumentation: a prospective, randomized clinical study. Journal of Applied Oral Science 24(5), 503-508.
Bartols, A., Laux, G., & Walther, W. (2016) Multiple-file vs. single-file endodontics in dental practice: a study in routine care. PeerJ 4:e2765.
Chugal, N., Mallya, S. M., Kahler, B., & Lin, L. M. (2017) Endodontic Treatment Outcomes. Dental Clinics of North America 61, 59-80.
Çiçek, E., Koçak, M., Koçak, S., Salam, B., & Türker, S. (2017) Postoperative pain intensity after using different instrumentation techniques: a randomized clinical study. Journal of Applied Oral Science 25(1), 20-26.
Comparin, D., Moreira, E., Souza, E., De-Deus, G., Arias, A., & Silva, E. (2017) Postoperative Pain after Endodontic Retreatment Using Rotary or Reciprocating Instruments: a Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Endodontics 43(7), 1084-1088.
Dalton, B., Orstavik, D., Phillips, C., Pettiette, M., & Trope, M. (1998) Bacterial reduction with nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation. Journal of Endodontics 24(11), 763-767.
Darda, S., Manwar, N., Chandak, M., & Shori, D. D. (2009) An in vivo evaluation of two types of files used to accurately determine the diameter of the apical constriction of a root canal: an in vivo study. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 10(4), 43-50.
Del Fabbro, M., Afrashtehfar, K. I., Corbella, S., El-Kabbaney, A., Perondi, I., & Taschieri, S. (2018) In Vivo and In Vitro Effectiveness of Rotary Nickel-Titanium vs Manual Stainless Steel Instruments for Root Canal Therapy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice 18(1), 59-69.
Dourado, A. T., Caldas Junior, A. de F., Alves, D. F., & Falcao, C. A. (2005) Bacteriemia during endodontic treatment in relation to the technique of biomechanical preparation: randomized clinical trial. Journal of Applied Oral Science 13(4), 334-339.
Endo, M. S., Signoretti, F. G. C., Pavan, N. N. O., Martinho, F. C., & Gomes, B. P. F. A. (2014) Effectiveness of hand iles and the MTwo R system in bacterial reduction in endodontically treated teeth with chronic apical periodontitis. Dental Press Endodontics 4(3), 21-27.
Ensor, H., Lee, R. J., Sudlow, C., & Weir, C. J. (2016) Statistical approaches for evaluating surrogate outcomes in clinical trials: A systematic review. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 26(5), 859-879.
Fava, L. R. G. (1995) Single visit root canal treatment: incidence of postoperative pain using three different instrumentation techniques. International Endodontic Journal 28(2), 103-107.
Feys, F., Bekkering, G. E., Singh, K., & Devroey, D. (2014) Do randomized clinical trials with inadequate blinding report enhanced placebo effects for intervention groups and nocebo effects for placebo groups? Systematic Review 3, 14.
Gambarini, G., Nardo, D., Miccoli, G., Guerra, F., Di Giorgio, R., Di Giorgio, G., Glassman, G., Piasecki, L., & Testarelli, L. (2017) The influence of a new clinical motion for endodontic instruments on the incidence of postoperative pain. Clinica Terapeutica 16(8), e23-e27.
Gathani, K., & Raghavendra, S. S. (2016) Comparison of postoperative pain in single-visit and multiple-visit endodontic therapy using ProTaper Universal, Hero Shaper and the Self-adjusting File - A split-mouth clinical trial. Endo-Endodontic Practice Today 10(1), 23-28.
Gomes, A. C., Soares, A. J., Souza, E. M., Zaia, A. A., & Silva, E. (2017) Intraoperative discomfort associated with the use of a rotary or reciprocating system: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics 42(2), 140-145.
Higgins, J. P., Altman, D. G., Gotzsche, P. C., Jüni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A. D., Savovic, J., Schulz, K. F., Weeks, L., Sterne, J. A.; Cochrane Bias Methods Group; Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343, d5928.
Jain, N., Pawar, A. M., Naganath, M., Gupta, A., & Daryani, H. (2016) Incidence and severity of postoperative pain after canal instrumentation with reciprocating system, continuous rotary single file system, versus SAF system. Endo-Endodontic Practice Today 10(3), 153-160.
Jardine, A. P., da Rosa, R. A., Santini, M. F., Zaccara, I. M., So, M. V. R., & Kopper, P. M. P. (2016) Shaping ability of rotatory or reciprocating instruments in curved canals: a micro-computed tomographic study. Brazilian Oral Research 30(1), 1-5.
Kashefinejad, M., Harandi, A., Eram, S., & Bijani, A. (2016) Comparison of Single Visit Post Endodontic Pain Using Mtwo Rotary and Hand K-File Instruments: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Dentistry 13(1), 10-17.
Kfir, A., Rosenberg, E., & Fuss, Z. (2006) Comparison in vivo of the first tapered and nontapered instruments that bind at the apical constriction. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology 102(3), 395-398.
Kfir, A., Rosenberg, E., Zuckerman, O., Tamse, A., & Fuss, Z. (2003) Comparison of procedural errors resulting during root canal preparations completed by junior dental students in patients using an '8-step method' versus 'serial step-back technique'. International Endodontic Journal 36(1), 49-53.
Khan, K. S., Daya, S., & Jadad, A. (1996) The importance of quality of primary studies in producing unbiased systematic reviews. Archives of Internal Medicine 156(6), 661-666.
Kherlakian, D., Cunha, R., Ehrhardt, I., Zuolo, M., Kishen, A., & Silveira, B. C. (2016) Comparison of the Incidence of Postoperative Pain after Using 2 Reciprocating Systems and a Continuous Rotary System: a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Endodontics 42(2), 171-176.
Krithikadatta, J., Sekar, V., Sudharsan, P., & Velumurugan, N. (2016) Influence of three Ni-Ti cleaning and shaping files on postinstrumentation endodontic pain: A triple-blinded, randomized, controlled trial. Journal of Conservative Dentistry 19(4), 311-316.
Loguercio, A. D., Maran, B. M., Hanzen, T. A., Paula, A. M., Perdigao, J., & Reis, A. (2017) Randomized clinical trials of dental bleaching - Compliance with the CONSORT Statement: a systematic review. Brazilian Oral Research 31(suppl 1), e60.
Marshall, F. J., & Pappin, J. (1988) A crown-down pressureless preparation root canal enlargement technique. Portland, USA: Technique manual, University of Oregon Health Sciences University.
Mohammadi, Z., Jafarzadeh, H., Shalavi, S., & Palazzi, F. (2017) Recent Advances in Root Canal Disinfection: A Review. Iranian Endodontic Journal 12(4), 402-406.
Mollashahi, N. F., Saberi, E. A., Havaei, S. R., & Sabeti, M. (2017) Comparison of Postoperative Pain after Root Canal Preparation with Two Reciprocating and Rotary Single-File Systems: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Iranian Endodontic Journal 12(1), 15-19.
Neelakantan, P., & Sharma, S. (2015) Pain after single-visit root canal treatment with two single-file systems based on different kinematics--a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. Clinical Oral Investigations 19(9), 2211-2217.
Nekoofar, M., Sheykhrezae, M., Meraji, N., Jamee, A., Shirvani, A., Jamee, J., & Dummer, P. M. (2015) Comparison of the effect of root canal preparation by using WaveOne and ProTaper on postoperative pain: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Endodontics 41(5), 575-578.
Neves, M. A. S., Provenzano, J. C., Rôças, I. N., & Siqueira, J. F. (2016) Clinical Antibacterial Effectiveness of Root Canal Preparation with Reciprocating Single-instrument or Continuously Rotating Multi-instrument Systems. Journal of Endodontics 42(1), 25-29.
Pasqualini, D., Alovisi, M., Cemenasco, A., Mancini, L., Paolino, D. S., Bianchi, C. C., Roggia, A., Scotti, N., & Berutti, E. (2015) Micro-Computed Tomography Evaluation of ProTaper Next and BioRace Shaping Outcomes in Maxillary First Molar Curved Canals. Journal of Endodontics 41(10), 1706-1710.
Pasqualini, D., Corbella, S., Alovisi, M., Taschieri, S., Del Fabbro, M., Migliaretti, G., Carpegna, G. C., Scotti, N., & Berutti, E. (2016) Postoperative quality of life following single-visit root canal treatment performed by rotary or reciprocating instrumentation: a randomized clinical trial. International Endodontic Journal 49(11), 1030-1039.
Pereira, A. S., Shitsuka, D. M., Parreira, F. J. & Shitsuka, R. (2018) Metodologia da Pesquisa Científica. 1. ed. – Santa Maria, RS: UFSM, NTE, 119 p.
Peters, O. A., Barbakow, F., & Peters, C. I. (2004) An analysis of endodontic treatment with three nickel-titanium rotary root canal preparation techniques. International Endodontic Journal 37(12), 849-859.
Pettiette, M. T., Delano, E. O., & Trope, M. (2001) Evaluation of success rate of endodontic treatment performed by students with stainless-steel K-files and nickel-titanium hand files. Journal of Endodontics 27(2), 124-127.
Pocock, S. (1983) Clinical Trials: A Practical Approach, Chichester UK: John Wiley & Sons.
Reis, A., de Geus, J. L., Wambier, L., Schroeder, M., & Loguercio, A. D. (2018) Compliance of Randomized Clinical Trials in Noncarious Cervical Lesions With the CONSORT Statement: A Systematic Review of Methodology. Operative Dentistry 43(3), E129-E151.
Relvas, J., Bastos, M., Marques, A., Garrido, A., & Sponchiado, E. (2016) Assessment of postoperative pain after reciprocating or rotary NiTi instrumentation of root canals: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clinical Oral Investigations 20(8), 1987-1993.
Ritt, A. S., Buco, J., Wagner, M. H., Rosa, R. A., Vier-Pelisser, F. V., & Só, M. V. R. (2012) Avaliação da eficácia da instrumentação manual x automatizada durante o retratamento endodôntico em canais radiculares obturados com guta-percha e cimento à base de hidróxido de cálcio. Revista da Faculdade de Odontologia UPF 17(1), 55-59.
Saha, S. G., Gupta, R. K., Bhardwaj, A., Misuriya, A., Saha, M. K., & Nirwan, A. S. (2018) Comparison of the incidence of postoperative pain after using a continuous rotary system, a reciprocating system, and a Self-Adjusting File system in single-visit endodontics: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Journal of Conservative Dentistry 21(3), 333-338.
Sanfelice, C. M., da Costa, F. B., Reis Só, M. V., Vier-Pelisser, F., Souza Bier, C. A., & Grecca, F. S. (2010) Effects of Four Instruments on Coronal Pre-enlargement by Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Journal of Endodontics 36(5), 858-861.
Saumya-Rajesh, P., Krithikadatta, J., Velmurugan, N., & Sooriaprakas, C. (2017) Post-instrumentation pain after the use of either Mtwo or the SAF system: a randomized controlled clinical trial. International Endodontic Journal 50(8), 750-760.
Schriger, D. L., & Altman, D. G. (2006) The content of medical journals instruction for authors. Annals of Internal Medicine 48(6), 743-749.
Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010) CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Journal of Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapeutics 1, 100-107.
Schulz, K. F., Chalmers, I., Hayes, R. J., & Altman, D. G. (1995) Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 273(5), 408-412.
Shahi, S., Asghari, V., Rahimi, S., Lotfi, M., Samiei, M., Yavari, H., Shakouie, S., & Nezafati, S. (2016) Postoperative Pain after Endodontic Treatment of Asymptomatic Teeth Using Rotary Instruments: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Iranian Endodontic Journal 11(1), 38-43.
Shokraneh, A., Ajami, M., Farhadi, N., Hosseini, M., & Rohani, B. (2017) Postoperative endodontic pain of three different instrumentation techniques in asymptomatic necrotic mandibular molars with periapical lesion: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Clinical Oral Investigations 21(1), 413-418.
Topcuoglu, H., & Topcuoglu, G. (2017) Postoperative pain after the removal of root canal filling material using different techniques in teeth with failed root canal therapy: a randomized clinical trial. Acta odontologica Scandinavica 75(4), 249-254.
Tortini, D., Colombo, M., & Gagliani, M. (2007) Apical crown technique to model canal roots. A review of the literature. Minerva Stomatology 56(9), 445-459.
Wan, N., Wang, X. Y., Qi, L., Yan, L., Ma, J., Yin, Y., Gao, W., & Wu, P. (2017) Clinical evaluation of nickel-titanium mechanical instruments in three different movement patterns combined with warm vertical compaction in the single-visit endodontic treatment. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research 21, 893-898.
Wang, C., Xu, P., Ren, L., Dong, G., & Ye, L. (2010) Comparison of post-obturation pain experience following one-visit and two-visit root canal treatment on teeth with vital pulps: a randomized controlled trial. International Endodontic Journal 43(8), 692-697.
Wang, Y., Zhu, Y., Wang, H., Han, J., He, Y., & Zhu, M. (2010) Clinical effect of three kinds of rotary nickel-titanium instruments on root canal preparation of molars. Shanghai kou qiang yi xue 19(2), 118-123.
Wei, X., Lin, Z., & Peng, S. (2003) The effect of root canal preparation with nickel-titanium rotary instruments in reducing post-operative pain. Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi 21(3), 202-204.
Zhou, Z. J., & He, H. (2013) Clinical study on the effects of single visit root canal treatment of chronic periapical periodontitis by two kinds of root canal preparation instruments system. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 22(1), 85-88.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2021 Karla Aguiar Cabral; Ana Cristina Rodrigues Martins; Letícia Maíra Wambier; Nilton Vivacqua-Gomes ; Márcia Rezende; Alessandra Reis; Juliana Larocca de Geus
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
1) Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
2) Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
3) Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado.
