Bases conceituais que suportam a relação entre Conhecimento e Patente
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i5.28070Palavras-chave:
Inovação; Patente; Conhecimento; Pesquisa bibliométrica; Proximidade geográfica.Resumo
O interesse sobre pesquisas relacionadas a conhecimento e patentes, vem crescendo no meio acadêmico e gerencial. Em busca de contribuir com a literatura, este estudo utiliza a análise bibliométrica, com uma amostra de 797 artigos que relacionam conhecimento e patentes, extraídos da base de dados Web of Science. Neste estudo, o objetivo é explorar as bases conceituais sobre a relação entre conhecimento e patente e responder à seguinte questão: quais são as bases conceituais que suportam a relação entre conhecimento e patentes? Sobre as principais descobertas, destacamos a hegemonia dos Estados Unidos nos estudos relacionados ao tema, a evolução da China nos últimos anos nesse sentido, além dos avanços da Itália, com número expressivo de estudos na terceira posição. Outro ponto relevante foi a identificação do aumento na produção de artigos sobre conhecimento em mais de 70% nos últimos oito anos (2013-2020). Em relação aos principais temas encontrados na análise de fatores, aponta-se destaque para: aprendizagem e redes organizacionais; inovação e proximidade geográfica; e patente e spillovers de conhecimento. Ao final, foram atingidos os objetivos do estudo, com destaque para a estruturação de análise de patentes ao longo do tempo e a tendência de estudos sobre proximidade geográfica e spillovers de conhecimento, ao se analisarem conhecimento e patente. Outros achados importantes desta pesquisa são: a mostra das principais revistas, autores, número de citações e cocitações, evolução da pesquisa no tempo, além de indicações sobre estudos futuros.
Referências
Ahlstrom, D. (2010). Innovation and growth: How business contributes to society. Academy of management perspectives, 24(3), 11-24.
Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative science quarterly, 45(3), 425-455.
Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1999). Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management science, 45(7), 905-917.
Araújo, C. A. (2006). Bibliometria: evolução histórica e questões atuais. Em questão, 12(1), 11-32.
Arroyabe, M. F. (2021). The role of patent expiration in acquisition decision and target selection in the pharmaceutical industry. R&D Management.
Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American economic review, 86(3), 630-640.
Baghdadi, H. B., & Aouadi, S. (2018). Does Patent Performance Promote Relative Technological Performance in Countries Bordering the Mediterranean? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 9(4), 1246-1269.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.
Barney, J. B. (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of management, 27(6), 643-650.
Bengtsson, M., & Sölvell, Ö. (2004). Climate of competition, clusters and innovative performance. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 20(3), 225-244.
Bezerra, E. A. G., Souza, G. A. A. D., Gonçalves, M. C. P., Versiani, M. S., de Sousa Xavier, M. A., de Oliveira, A. M. E., & de Oliveira Xavier, A. R. E. (2021). Estudo prospectivo de patentes relacionadas a vacinas contra o SARS-CoV-2. Research, Society and Development, 10(10), e237101018803-e237101018803.
Björkman, I., Stahl, G. K., & Vaara, E. (2007). Cultural differences and capability transfer in cross-border acquisitions: The mediating roles of capability complementarity, absorptive capacity, and social integration. Journal of international business studies, 38(4), 658-672.
Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional studies, 39(1), 61-74.
Camargo, B. V., & Justo, A. M. (2013). Tutorial para uso do software de análise textual IRAMUTEQ. Florianopolis-SC: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.
Camisón, C., & Forés, B. (2010). Knowledge absorptive capacity: New insights for its conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Business Research, 63(7), 707-715.
Cantelli, G., Cochrane, G., Brooksbank, C., McDonagh, E., Flicek, P., McEntyre, J. & Apweiler, R. (2021). The European Bioinformatics Institute: empowering cooperation in response to a global health crisis. Nucleic acids research, 49(D1), D29-D37.
Cappelli, R., Corsino, M., Laursen, K., & Torrisi, S. (2018). Technological Competition & Patent Strategy: Protection, Blocking Rivals or the Freedom to Operate. In Academy of Management Proceedings. (1), 18067. Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
Chen, K. H., & Liao, P. Y. (2012). A comparative study on world university rankings: a bibliometric survey. Scientometrics, 92(1), 89-103.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
Chueke, G. V., & Amatucci, M. (2015). O que é bibliometria? Uma introdução ao Fórum. Internext, 10(2), 1-5.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 128-152.
Cruz, S. C., & Teixeira, A. A. (2010). The evolution of the cluster literature: Shedding light on the regional studies–regional science debate. Regional studies, 44(9), 1263-1288.
Curado, C., & Bontis, N. (2006). The knowledge-based view of the firm and its theoretical precursor. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 3(4), 367-381.
Da Veiga, C. P., Da Veiga, C. R. P., Del Corso, J. M., & Da Silva, W. V. (2015). Dengue vaccines: a perspective from the point of view of intellectual property. International journal of environmental research and public health, 12(8), 9454-9474.
Dahlberg, I. (1978). Fundamentos teórico-conceituais da classificação. Revista de Biblioteconomia de Brasília, 6 (1), 9-21.
Dahlberg, I. (1995). Current trends in knowledge organization. Organización del conocimiento em sistemas de información y documentación. Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza, 7-25.
Dikova, D., & Van Witteloostuijn, A. (2007). Foreign direct investment mode choice: entry and establishment modes in transition economies. Journal of international business studies, 38(6), 1013-1033.
Dong, J., Liu, R., Qiu, Y., & Crossan, M. (2021). Should knowledge be distorted? Managers' knowledge distortion strategies and organizational learning in different environments. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(3), 101477.
Fang, Y., Wade, M., Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. (2013). An exploration of multinational enterprise knowledge resources and foreign subsidiary performance. Journal of World Business, 48(1), 30-38.
Felin, T., & Hesterly, W. S. (2007). The knowledge-based view, nested heterogeneity, and new value creation: Philosophical considerations on the locus of knowledge. Academy of management review, 32(1), 195-218.
Ferreras-Méndez, J. L., Fernández-Mesa, A., & Alegre, J. (2016). The relationship between knowledge search strategies and absorptive capacity: A deeper look. Technovation, 54, 48-61.
Flatten, T. C., Engelen, A., Zahra, S. A., & Brettel, M. (2011). A measure of absorptive capacity: Scale development and validation. European Management Journal, 29(2), 98-116.
Fleming, L. (2001). Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management science, 47(1), 117-132.
Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. (2004). Science as a map in technological search. Strategic management journal, 25(8‐9), 909-928.
Foss, N. J., & Pedersen, T. (2002). Transferring knowledge in MNCs: The role of sources of subsidiary knowledge and organizational context. Journal of International Management, 8(1), 49-67.
Freeman, S., Hutchings, K., Lazaris, M., & Zyngier, S. (2010). A model of rapid knowledge development: The smaller born-global firm. International Business Review, 19(1), 70-84.
Gardenfors, P. (2014). The geometry of meaning: Semantics based on conceptual spaces. MIT press.
Glänzel, W., & Moed, H. F. (2002). Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics, 53(2), 171-193.
Goyal, S., Ahuja, M., & Kankanhalli, A. (2020). Does the source of external knowledge matter? Examining the role of customer co-creation and partner sourcing in knowledge creation and innovation. Information & Management, 57(6), 103325.
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm. Strategic management journal, 17(S2), 109-122.
Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey Part II. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
Guan, J. C., & Yan, Y. (2016). Technological proximity and recombinative innovation in the alternative energy field. Research Policy, 45(7), 1460-1473.
Guo, B., Jin, Y., & Li, Q. (2019). How does spatial crowdedness affect patenting performance in industrial clusters? An empirical study on the moderated U-shaped relationship. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 31(9), 1016-1028.
Hair, J. F., Black, Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2005). Analise Multivariada de Dados. Bookman.
Hair, J., Babin, B., Money, A., & Samouel, P. (2005). Fundamentos de métodos de pesquisa em administração. Bookman Companhia Ed.
Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools (No. w8498). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Haschka, R. E., & Herwartz, H. (2020). Innovation efficiency in European high-tech industries: Evidence from a Bayesian stochastic frontier approach. Research Policy, 49(8), 104054.
Hausman, J. A., Hall, B. H., & Griliches, Z. (1984). Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship (No. t0017). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Hausman, J., & McFadden, D. (1984). Specification tests for the multinomial logit model. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, 1219-1240.
Isaksson, O. H., Simeth, M., & Seifert, R. W. (2016). Knowledge spillovers in the supply chain: Evidence from the high tech sectors. Research Policy, 45(3), 699-706.
Jaffe, A. B. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: evidence from firms' patents, profits and market value.
Jaffe, A. B. (1989). Real effects of academic research. The American economic review, 957-970.
Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (1999). International knowledge flows: Evidence from patent citations. Economics of innovation and new technology, 8 (1-2), 105-136.
Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The Quarterly journal of Economics, 108(3), 577-598.
Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2005). Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter? Academy of management journal, 48(6), 999-1015.
Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of management journal, 45(6), 1183-1194.
Keller, W. (2004). International technology diffusion. Journal of economic literature, 42(3), 752-782.
Kiessling, T. S., Richey, R. G., Meng, J., & Dabic, M. (2009). Exploring knowledge management to organizational performance outcomes in a transitional economy. Journal of world business, 44(4), 421-433.
Koch, S., Bosch, H., Giereth, M., & Ertl, T. (outubro de 2009). Integração iterativa de percepções visuais durante a pesquisa e análise de patentes. Em 2009 IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (pp. 203-210). IEEE.
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization science, 3(3), 383-397.
Kostopoulos, K., Papalexandris, A., Papachroni, M., & Ioannou, G. (2011). Absorptive capacity, innovation, and financial performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(12), 1335-1343.
Kotabe, M., Jiang, C. X., & Murray, J. Y. (2011). Managerial ties, knowledge acquisition, realized absorptive capacity and new product market performance of emerging multinational companies: A case of China. Journal of World Business, 46(2), 166-176.
Lai, L., & Zhang, Y. (2020). The Relationship Between Patent Characteristics and Patent Litigation in the Patent Pool of High-Tech Enterprises. In Recent Trends in Decision Science and Management (pp. 427-441). Springer, Singapore.
Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R., & Pathak, S. (2006). The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of management review, 31(4), 833-863.
Lau, A. K., & Lo, W. (2015). Regional innovation system, absorptive capacity and innovation performance: An empirical study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, 99-114.
Lee, E. Y., & Cin, B. C. (2010). The effect of risk-sharing government subsidy on corporate R&D investment: Empirical evidence from Korea. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(6), 881-890.
Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic management journal, 14(S2), 95-112.
Liu, J., Grubler, A., Ma, T. et al. (2021). Identifying the technological knowledge depreciation rate using patent citation data: a case study of the solar photovoltaic industry. Scientometrics 126, 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03740-x.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization science, 2(1), 71-87.
Marchiori, D., & Franco, M. (2020). Knowledge transfer in the context of inter-organizational networks: Foundations and intellectual structures. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(2), 130-139.
Maurseth, P. B. (2002). Geography and growth-some empirical evidence. NUPI - Norsk Utenrikspolitisk Institutt, N 623.
Maurseth, P. B., & Verspagen, B. (2002). Knowledge spillovers in Europe: a patent citations analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104(4), 531-545.
Mayer, KJ (2006). Spillovers e governança: uma análise dos spillovers de conhecimento e reputação em tecnologia da informação. Academy of Management Journal, 49 (1), 69-84.
Minbaeva, D., Pedersen, T., Björkman, I., Fey, C. F., & Park, H. J. (2014). MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(1), 38-51.
Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (1996). Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic management journal, 17(S2), 77-91.
Nair, S. R., Demirbag, M., & Mellahi, K. (2016). Reverse knowledge transfer in emerging market multinationals: The Indian context. International Business Review, 25(1), 152-164.
Narin, F., Hamilton, K. S., & Olivastro, D. (1997). The increasing linkage between US technology and public science. Research policy, 26(3), 317-330.
Nerur, Rasheed & Natarajan (2008). The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: an author co-citation analysis. Strategic Management Journal, v. 29, p. 319-336.
Okubo, Y. (1997). "Bibliometric Indicators and Analysis of Research Systems: Methods and Examples", OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No. 1997/01, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/ 10.1787 / 208277770603.
Park, H., Yoon, J., & Kim, K. (2013). Using function-based patent analysis to identify potential application areas of technology for technology transfer. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(13), 5260-5265.
Pérez‐Nordtvedt, L., Kedia, B. L., Datta, D. K., & Rasheed, A. A. (2008). Effectiveness and efficiency of cross‐border knowledge transfer: An empirical examination. Journal of management Studies, 45(4), 714-744.
Pigola, A., da Costa, P. R., Carvalho, L. M. C., Porto, G. S., & de Paulo, A. F. (2022). High Analytics Information Technological Routes: a patent network analysis. Research, Society and Development, 11 (4), e38011427569- e38011427569.
Pilkington, A. & Meredith, J. (2009). The evolution of the intellectual structure of operations management – 1980– 2006: a citation/co-citation analysis. Journal of Operations Management, 27, pp. 185–202.
Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004). Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence. International journal of management reviews, 5 (3‐4), 137-168.
Plank, J., & Doblinger, C. (2018). The firm-level innovation impact of public R&D funding: Evidence from the German renewable energy sector. Energy policy, 113, 430-438.
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative science quarterly, 116-145.
Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. (2001). Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of management review, 26(1), 22-40.
Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of documentation, 25(4), 348-349.
Pritchard, A., & Wittig, GR (1981). Bibliometria. Watford: AllM Books.
Quevedo-Silva, F., Santos, E. B. A., Brandão, M. M., & Vils, L. (2016). Estudo bibliométrico: orientações sobre sua aplicação. Revista Brasileira de Marketing, 15(2), 246-262.
Ramos‐Rodríguez, A. R., & Ruíz‐Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000. Strategic management journal, 25(10), 981-1004.
Reinert, M. (1990). Alceste une méthodologie d'analyse des données textuelles et une application: Aurelia De Gerard De Nerval. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de méthodologie sociologique, 26(1), 24-54.
Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S71-S102.
Roper, S., & Hewitt-Dundas, N. (2015). Knowledge stocks, knowledge flows and innovation: Evidence from matched patents and innovation panel data. Research Policy, 44(7), 1327-1340.
Rosenkopf, L., & Almeida, P. (2003). Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management science, 49(6), 751-766.
Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic management journal, 22(4), 287-306.
Schleimer, S. C., & Pedersen, T. (2014). The effects of MNC parent effort and social structure on subsidiary absorptive capacity. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(3), 303-320.
Singh, J. (2005). Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management science, 51(5), 756-770.
Small, H., & Garfield, E. (1985). The geography of sciencew: disciplinary and national mappings. Journal of Information Science, 11(4), 147-159
Song, J. (2014). Subsidiary absorptive capacity and knowledge transfer within multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(1), 73-84.
Stuart, T. E., & Podolny, J. M. (1996). Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic management journal, 17(S1), 21-38.
Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic management journal, 17(S2), 27-43.
Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research policy, 15(6), 285-305.
Thompson, P., & Fox-Kean, M. (2005). Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: A reassessment. American Economic Review, 95(1), 450-460.
Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations. The Rand journal of economics, 172-187.
Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., & Jaffe, A. (1997). University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention. Economics of Innovation and new technology, 5(1), 19-50.
Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of management journal, 44(5), 996-1004.
Van den Bosch, F. A., Volberda, H. W., & De Boer, M. (1999). Coevolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: Organizational forms and combinative capabilities. Organization science, 10(5), 551-568.
Van Raan, A. F. (1993). Advanced bibliometric methods to assess research performance and scientific development: basic principles and recent practical applications. Research Evaluation, 3(3), 151-166.
Vermeulen, F., & Barkema, H. (2001). Learning through acquisitions. Academy of Management journal, 44(3), 457-476.
Volberda, H. W., Foss, N. J., & Lyles, M. A. (2010). Perspective Absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: How to realize its potential in the organization field. Organization science, 21(4), 931-951.
Wang, D., Sørensen, O. J., & Moini, H. (2018). Disentangling the value creation mechanism in cross‐border acquisitions: A process‐oriented approach. Thunderbird International Business Review, 60(3), 387-409.
Wang, L., Li, S., & You, Z. (2020). The effects of knowledge transfer on innovation capability: A moderated mediation model of absorptive capability and network reliance. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 31(1), 100372.
Wang, W., & Lu, S. (2021). University-industry innovation community dynamics and knowledge transfer: Evidence from China. Technovation, 106, 102305.
Wernerfelt, B. (2013). Small forces and large firms: Foundations of the RBV. Strategic Management Journal, 34(6), 635-643.
White, H. D. & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a Discipline: An Author CoCitation Analysis of Information Science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49: 327-55.
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of management review, 27(2), 185-203.
Zhou, A. J., Fey, C., & Yildiz, H. E. (2018). Fostering integration through HRM practices: An empirical examination of absorptive capacity and knowledge transfer in cross-border M&As. Journal of World Business, 55(2), 100947.
Zhou, K. Z., & Li, C. B. (2012). How knowledge affects radical innovation: Knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing. Strategic management journal, 33(9), 1090-1102.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2022 Franklin Menezes da Silva; Priscila Rezende da Costa
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
1) Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
2) Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
3) Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado.
