Bibliometric study of geotechnologies on the analysis of environmental vulnerability: perspectives for environmental management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i10.32548Keywords:
Scientific production; Ecological Risk; GIS.Abstract
Population growth and, consequently, the uncontrolled growth of municipalities, increased demand for natural resources, inadequate disposal, and waste didisposalre factors significantly contribute to environmental degradation. In this context, an environment changes according to its degree of susceptibility, and this characteristic consists of the sensitivity it has to resist particular stress, thus being called vulnerability. In vulnerability analysis, natural (elevation, vegetation, soil type, etc.) and anthropic factors (land use, population density, etc.) are considered. To evaluate the factors most used in scientific works that deal with environmental vulnerability, a bibliographic survey was carried out using scientometrics and a bibliometric approach. The research base was SciVerse Scopus, and the search words were "Environmental Vulnerability" AND GIS* OR "Remote Sensing.”. Remote Control (SR) with Geographic Information Systems (GIS) combined with mathematical, and statistical analysis methods reduce the data size and generate more reliable results. The study also showed that, regardless of the technique used, environmental vulnerability analyzes have the same principle and variables, even though there is variation in the type and quantity of factors according to the region studied. Thus, there is no general rule for selecting the number of variables necessary for such an analysis.
References
Andrade, R. L. (2016). A influência das redes de coautoria na performance dos bolsistas de produtividade e nos programas de pós-graduação em engenharia de produção. [Dissertação de Mestrado]. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife. https://repositorio.ufpe.br/handle /123456789/17264.
Belward, A. S: Skoien, J. O. (2015). “Who Launched What, When and Why; Trends in Global Land-Cover Observation Capacity from Civilian Earth Observation Satellites.” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing: Official Publication of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 103 (May): 115–28.
CONAB. (2020). Acompanhamento da Safra Brasileira de Grãos. Primeiro levantamento, Brasília. https://www.conab.gov.br/component/k2/item/download/35523_38fae3bc88d9b5f 875d991b8be1490da.
Criado, M. O. U., Sánchez, J. J. N. & Valentín, E. M. M. (2018). A research agenda on open innovation and entrepreneurship: a co-word analysis. Administrative Sciences, 8(34), 1-17.
Grácio, M. C. C. (2016). Acoplamento bibliográfico e análise de cocitação: revisão teórico-conceitual. Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação, 21(47), 82-99.
Grecchi R. C., Gwyn, Q. H., Béinié, G. B., Formaggio, A. R. & Fahl, F. C. (2014). Land use and land cover changes in the Brazilian Cerrado: A multidisciplinary approach to assess the impacts of agricultural expansion. Applied Geography, 55, 300-312.
Grigio, A.M. (2003). Aplicação do sensoriamento remoto e sistemas de informação geográfica na determinação da vulnerabilidade natural e ambiental do Município de Guaramé (RN): simulação de risco às atividades da indústria petrolífera. o [Dissertação de mestrado]. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geodinâmica e Geofísica. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte. https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/18766/1/AlfredoMG.pdf.
ISO 14091:2021. (2021). Adaptation to climate change: Guidelines on vulnerability, impacts and risk assessment. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:14091:ed-1:v1:en.
Li, A., Wang, A., Liang, S. & Zhou, W. (2006) Eco-environmental vulnerability evaluation in mountainous region using remote sensing and GIS – a case study in the upper reaches of Minjiang River, China. Ecological Modelling, 192, 175–187.
Lorena, R.B., Santos, J.R., Shimabukuro, Y.E., Sant’anna, H.M., Sant’anna, H.S.S. & Menezes, R.S. (2001). Dados multitemporais de sensoriamento remoto para análise da dinâmica do solo e da cobertura da terra na região do Peixoto (AC). In: SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE SENSORIAMENTO REMOTO, FOZ DO IGUAÇU. Anais X SBSR, 1653-1656.
Machado Junior, C., Souza, M. T. S., Parisotto, I. R. D. S., & Palmisano, A. (2016). As Leis da Bibliometria em Diferentes Bases de Dados Científicos. Revista de Ciências da Administração, 18(44), 111-123.
Menezes, S. D. & Caregnato, S. E. (2018). Produção científica brasileira em química entre 2004 e 2013: análise dos artigos indexados na Web of Science. Encontros Bibli: Revista Eletrônica de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, 23(53), 25-38.
Microsoft Excel. (2020) Microsoft 365: Excel. https://www.microsoft.com/pt-br/mi crosoft-365/excel.
Milanezi, C. H. da S. & Pereira, J. G. (2016). Caracterização da Vulnerabilidade Ambiental na Microbacia Do Córrego Azul, Ivinhema – MS. Geografia, 25(1), 43–63.
Mueller, S. (2013). Estudos métricos da informação em ciência e tecnologia no Brasil realizados sobre a unidade de análise artigos de periódicos. Metrical studies on science and technology information in Brazil having the scientific article as unit of analysis. Liinc em Revista, 9(1).
Nguyen, A. K., Liou, Y., Li, M. & Tran, T. A. (2016). Zoning eco-environmental vulnerability for environmental management and protection. Ecological Indicators, 69, 100-117.
Ruas, T. L. & Pereira, L. (2014). Como construir indicadores de Ciência, tecnologia e inovação usando web of science, Derwent World Patent Index, Bibexcel e Pajek? Perspectivas Em Ciência Da Informação, 19(3), 52–81.
Sahoo S., Dhar, A. & Kar, A. (2016). Environmental vulnerability assessment using Grey Analytic Hierarchy Process based model. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 56, 145–154.
Si-Yuan W., Jing-Shi L. & Cun-Jian Y. (2008). Eco-Environmental Vulnerability Evaluation in the Yellow River Basin, China. Pedosphere, 18, 171-182.
Souza, E. da S. & Fontanele, R.E.S. (2019). Mapeamento da produção científica internacional sobre Valores Humanos Básicos. Em Questão, Porto Alegre, 25(3), 214-245.
Tagliani, C.R.A. (2003). Técnica para Avaliação da Vulnerabilidade Ambiental de Ambientes Costeiros Utilizando um Sistema Geográfico de Informação. In: Simpósio Brasileiro De Sensoriamento Remoto, Belo Horizonte. Anais XI SBSR, 11, p. 1657-1664.
The Mendeley Support Tea. (2017). Mendeley Reference Manager for Desktop. Versão 1.17.
Van Eck, N.J. & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Y. Ding, R. R.; Wolfram, D. Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice, 285–320.
Vosviewer. (2020). Visualizing scientific landscapes. Versão 1.6.15 de 2020.
Wang X. D., Zhong, X. H., Liu, S.Z., Liu, J. G., Wang, Z.Y. & Li, M. H. (2008). Regional assessment of environmental vulnerabily in the Tibean Plateau: Development and application of a new method. Journal of Arid Environments, 72, 1929-1939.
Zhao J., Ji, G., Tian, Y., Chen. Y. & Wang, Z. (2018). Environmental vulnerability assessment for mainland China based on entropy method. Ecological Indicators, 91, 410–422.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Diane Luiza Biesdorf; Camila Leonardo Mioto; Domingos Sávio Barbosa; Antonio Conceição Paranhos Filho; Normandes Matos da Silva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
