Techniques and complications of breast augmentation: a literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i2.40027Keywords:
Mammoplasty; Breast implant; Plastic surgery.Abstract
According to the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Brazil has the highest rate of plastic surgeries in the world. Following the world standard, breast augmentation is one of the most common cosmetic procedures in Brazil, being considered one of the safest procedures with the highest efficiency rate. This review aims to analyze the techniques and risks of breast augmentation. For the elaboration of the work, the integrative bibliographic review methodology was used. Regarding the surgical technique, two surgical methods are used to locate the implant, the subglandular and submuscular methods, with three options for incision methods: inframammary, periareolar and axillary for incision. it is essential to achieve the aesthetic and functional objective desired by the patient. Currently, implants are divided between anatomical shape and round shape, with the round being divided into 3 subtypes: round with high profile, round with super-high profile and round with low profile. In every surgical procedure there is a risk of complications, with ASIA syndrome, infection and seroma being the most common in mammoplasty. From the present study, it is possible to observe that there are several techniques for performing the silicone implant and when choosing, the plastic surgeon must take the technical criteria proven in the medical literature and the patient's desire.
References
Baxter, R. (2004). Indications and practical applications for high-profile saline breast implants. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 24(1), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2003.10.005
Biazus, J. V., Zucatto, A. E., & De Melo, M. P. (2012). Cirurgia da Mama. Artmed.
Biggs, T. M., & Yarish, R. S. (1988). Augmentation mammaplasty: retropectoral versus retromammary implantation. Clinics in plastic surgery, 15(4), 549–555.
Botelho, F.M., (2009). Corpo, risco e consumo: uma etnografia das atletas de fisiculturismo. Revista Habitus (Rio de Janeiro), 7(1), 104-119. https://doi.org/10.14295/idonline.v13i47.2089
Calderón, J. M., & Carriquiry, C. (2016). Actualidad en mamoplastía de aumento. Horizonte Médico (Lima), 16(2), 54–62. http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1727-558X2016000200010&lng=es&tlng=es.
Cárdenas-Camarena, L., & Encinas-Brambila, J. (2009). Round Gel Breast Implants or Anatomic Gel Breast Implants: Which is the Best Choice? Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 33(5), 743–751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-009-9370-8
Cardoso, I., Cardoso, J., & Cardoso, G. (2014). Mastopexia periareolar (circum-areolar) com implante mamário cônico: tratamento de ptose, hipomastia e alterações de posição e tamanho do complexo aréolo-papilar. Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica, 29(3), 368–374. https://doi.org/10.5935/2177-1235.2014RBCP0068
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões. (2001). Programa de Auto-avaliação em Cirurgia - Pré e pós operatório. Digraphic. https://cbc.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Ano1-I.Pre-e-pos-operatorio.pdf
Coombs, D. M., et al. (2019). Breast augmentation surgery: Clinical considerations. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 86(2), 111-122.
Daher, J. C., Amaral, J. D. L. G. do, Pedroso, D. B., Cintra Júnior, R., & Borgatto, M. de S. (2012). Mastopexia associada a implante de silicone submuscular ou subglandular: sistematização das escolhas e dificuldades. Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica, 27(2), 294–300. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1983-51752012000200021
Ferraz, H., Roxo, A., Aboudib, J., Castro, C., Nahas, F., & Serra, F. (2012). Mamoplastia de aumento: análise comparativa das técnicas periareolar e transaxilar. Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica, 27(3), 55–55. http://www.rbcp.org.br/details/1138/mamoplastia-de-aumento--analise-comparativa-das-tecnicas-periareolar-e-transaxilar
Fortes, F. B. (2019). Tipos de Próteses Mamárias: Tire suas dúvidas. In: Dr. Flávio Borges Fortes Cirurgia Plástica. Blog http://clinicaborgesfortes.com.br/tipos-de-proteses-mamarias-esclareca-suas-duvidas/
Gemperli, R., et al. Fundamentos da cirurgia plástica. (1ª. ed.) [s.l: s.n.].
Harvey, K. L., & Clark, S. E. (2016). A guide to breast implants for the non-breast specialist. Women’s Health, 12(6), 533–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745505716687562
Hendricks, H. (2017). Aumento submuscular completo da mama: 650 casos administrados usando uma técnica cirúrgica alternativa. Cirurgia Plástica Estética, 31(2), 147–153.
ISAPS. (2019). International Survey on Aesthetic/cosmetic Procedures Performed in 2019. https://www.isaps.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Global-Survey-2019.pdf.
Jones, G. (2019). Bostwick’s plastic and reconstructive breast surgery. (4ª. ed.) [s.l: s.n.].
Lima, E., & Lima, M. (2018). Cirurgia dermatológica cosmética e corretiva. Guanabara Koogan. https://integrada.minhabiblioteca.com.br/#/books/9788527734431
Magnusson, M. R., et al. (2019). Breast Implant Illness: A Way Forward. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 143, 74s-81s.
Maximiliano, J., et al. (2017). Breast augmentation: Correlation between surgical planning and complication rates after surgery. Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica, 32(3), 332–338.
Mélega, M., et al. (2011). Cirurgia plástica: Os princípios e a atualidade. 1. ed. Guanabara Koogan.
Montemurro, P., Hedén, P., Behr, B., & Wallner, C. (2020). Controllable Factors to Reduce the Rate of Complications in Primary Breast Augmentation: A Review of the Literature. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 45(2), 498–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01726-x
Moon, D. J., & Deva, A. K. (2021). Averse Events Associated with Breast Implants. Clinics in Plastic Surgery, 48, 101–108.
Nahabedian, M. Y. (2019). Round Form-Stable Breast Implants. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 144, 73S81S. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000005953
Olley, P. C. ( 1974). Aspects of plastic surgery. Psychiatric aspects of referral. British Medical Journal, [s. l.], v. 3, p. 348-349.
Prodanov, C. C., & Freitas, E. C. (2013). Metodologia do trabalho científico: métodos e técnicas da pesquisa e do trabalho acadêmico. 2a ed. Nova Hamburgo: Editora Feevale.
Roxo, A. (2001). Análise comparativa entre as técnicas de mamoplastia de aumento transaxilar sem o uso de videoendoscopia e videoassistida. Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica, 28(3), 348–354. http://www.rbcp.org.br/details/1424/pt-BR/analise-comparativa-entre-as-tecnicas-de-mamoplastia-de-aumento-transaxilar-sem-o-uso-de-videoendoscopia-e-videoassistida
Roxo, A. C. W. (2013) Análise comparativa entre as técnicas de mamoplastia de aumento transaxilar sem o uso de videoendoscopia e videoassistida. Rev Bras Cir Plást. 28(3):348-54.
Secretaria de Estado de Saúde do Espírito Santo (2021). Protocolo de avaliação pré-operatória de pacientes para cirurgia eletiva. https://saude.es.gov.br/Media/sesa/Consulta%20P%C3%BAblica/PROTOCOLO%20DE%20AVALIA%C3%87%C3%83O%20PR%C3%89-OPERAT%C3%93RIA%20DE%20PACIENTES%20PARA%20CIRURGIA%20ELETIVA.pdf.
Spear, S. L., Carter, M. E., & Ganz, J. C. (2003). The Correction of Capsular Contracture by Conversion to “Dual-Plane” Positioning: Technique and Outcomes. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 112(2), 456–466. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000070987.15303.1a
Stamm, L., & Rosa, P. (2018). Estética aplicada à cirurgia plástica. Grupo A. https://integrada.minhabiblioteca.com.br/#/books/9788595027978
Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica (2016). Mamoplastia de Aumento. https://sbcp-sc.org.br/cirurgias-e-procedimentos/mama/mamoplastia-de-aumento/.
Sood, A., Xue, Erica Y., Sangiovanni, C., Therattil, Paul J., & Lee, Edward S. (2017). Breast Massage, Implant Displacement, and Prevention of Capsular Contracture After Breast Augmentation With Implants: A Review of the Literature. Eplasty, 17, e41. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5749369/
Souza, M. T., et al. (2010) Revisão integrativa: o que é e como fazer. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082010RW1134
Tavares-Filho, J. M., Franco, D., & Franco, T. (2015). Round versus anatomical breast implants: algorithm for choosing the appropriate form. Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica (RBCP) – Brazilian Journal of Plastic Surgery, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.5935/2177-1235.2015rbcp0173
Tebbetts, J. (2006). Aumento mamário de plano duplo: otimizando as relações implante-tecido mole em uma ampla gama de tipos de mama. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 118(7), 81S102S.
Toronto, C. E., & Remington, R. (Eds.). (2020). A step-by-step guide to conducting an integrative review. Cham, Swizterland: Springer International Publishing
Valente D. S., Carvalho, L. A., & Ferreira, M. T. (2011). Avaliação da qualidade de cicatrizes em mamoplastia de aumento por via submamária e transareolomamilar: um estudo longitudinal prospectivo. Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica, 26(1), 81-86.
Van Klei, W. A., Moons, K. G., Rutten, C. L., Schuurhuis, A., Knape, J. T., Kalkman, C. J., & Grobbee, D. E. (2002). The effect of outpatient preoperative evaluation of hospital inpatients on cancellation of surgery and length of hospital stay. Anesthesia and analgesia, 94(3), 644-649. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200203000-00030
Veloso, C. N., Abbas, K., & Tonin, J. M. F. (2013) Cirurgia plástica: qual o custo da indústria da beleza?. Anais Do Congresso Brasileiro De Custos - ABC. https://anaiscbc.emnuvens.com.br/anais/article/view/20
Vallarta-Rodríguez, R. A., Ruiz-Treviño, J. J., & Guerrero-Burgos, F. (2014). Mamoplastia de aumento dinámica con control de vectores. Cirugía Plástica Ibero-Latinoamericana, 40(4), 377–384. https://doi.org/10.4321/s0376-78922014000400004
Zeitoune, G. C., et al. (2012). Subpeitoral ou subglandular: qual é a melhor localização do implante para pacientes com hipomastia? Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica, 27(3), 428-434.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Amanda Martins Fagundes; Rebeca Bulhões Lopes; Lara de Oliveira Passos; Beatriz Helena Braga Ludwig; Gabrielle de Jesus Paiano; Rafaella Regina Albero Casale; Jessica Reis Lopes; Raphael Balduino da Silva Santos; Larissa Walkyria Garcia Ribeiro; Carolina Cassiano do Rosário; Deborah Figueiredo Costa; Jaynayra Rafayela Trindade Muniz; Ana Júlia Apolinário Bellini; Rodrigo Daniel Zanoni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
