Influência do formato do implante e da plataforma protética na reabsorção óssea cervical: Uma revisão sistemática
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v13i1.44722Palavras-chave:
Perda óssea cervical; Forma do implante; Plataforma protética; Implantes dentários.Resumo
Objetivo: O objetivo desta revisão sistemática foi avaliar criticamente a literatura existente e responder à pergunta: "Qual formato de implante e plataforma protética promove a menor reabsorção cervical?". Material e método: Foram pesquisadas através das bases de dados SCOPUS, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, Lilacs e Google Scholar em setembro de 2023. Resultados: A pesquisa nas bases de dados resultou em 2850 artigos. Dos 12 artigos selecionados para leitura integral, 2 permaneceram nesta revisão sistemática. Há falta de informação para formar uma opinião e para efetuar uma análise estatística dos dados, pelo que se procedeu a uma análise descritiva. Conclusões: Com base nos estudos incluídos nesta revisão sistemática, a forma do implante influencia a estabilidade primária e a osseointegração, mas ainda não é possível relacioná-la diretamente com o POC. No entanto, o tipo de plataforma protética tem uma influência direta. Para além do tipo de plataforma protética utilizada, as várias características relacionadas com a forma do implante devem ser consideradas para manter níveis ósseos satisfatórios.
Referências
Camarda, A. J., Durand, R., Benkarim, M., Rompré, P. H., Guertin, G., & Ciaburro, H. (2021). Prospective randomized clinical trial evaluating the effects of two different implant collar designs on peri-implant healing and functional osseointegration after 25 years. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 32(3), 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13699.
Gago-García, A., Barrilero-Martín, C., Petrakakis, P., de Elio-Oliveros, J., Del Canto-Pingarrón, M., Alobera-Gracia, M. Á., & Seco-Calvo, J. (2021). Implant-prosthetic Rehabilitation with and without Platform Switching: A Retrospective Clinical Cohort Study. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 22(9), 1041-1047.
Juan-Montesinos, A., Agustín-Panadero, R., Solá-Ruiz, M. F., Marco-Pitarch, R., Montiel-Company, J. M., & Fons-Badal, C. (2022). Comparative Study by Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Peri-Implant Effect of Two Types of Platforms: Platform-Switching versus Conventional Platforms. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(6), 1743. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11061743.
Abrahamsson, I., & Berglundh, T. (2009). Effects of different implant surfaces and designs on marginal bone-level alterations: a review. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 20, 207-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01783.x.
Aslam, A., & Ahmed, B. (2016). Platform-switching to preserve peri-implant bone: a meta-analysis. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan, 26(4), 315-319.
Fuda, S., Martins, B. G. D. S., Castro, F. C., Heboyan, A., Gehrke, S. A., Fernandes, J. C. H., Mello-Moura, A. C. V., & Fernandes, G. V. O. (2023). Marginal Bone Level and Clinical Parameter Analysis Comparing External Hexagon and Morse Taper Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics (Basel), 13(9), 1587. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13091587.
Annibali, S., Bignozzi, I., Cristalli, M. P., Graziani, F., La Monaca, G., & Polimeni, A. (2012). Peri-implant marginal bone level: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing platform switching versus conventionally restored implants. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 39(11), 1097-1113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.2012.01930.x.
Atieh, M. A., Ibrahim, H. M., & Atieh, A. H. (2010). Platform switching for marginal bone preservation around dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Periodontology, 81(10), 1350-1366. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100232.
Rothamel, D., Heinz, M., Ferrari, D., Eissing, A., Holtmann, H., Schorn, L., & Fienitz, T. (2022). Impact of machined versus structured implant shoulder designs on crestal bone level changes: a randomized, controlled, multicenter study. International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 8(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-022-00432-4.
Pera, F., Menini, M., Bagnasco, F., Mussano, F., Ambrogio, G., & Pesce, P. (2021). Evaluation of internal and external hexagon connections in immediately loaded full-arch rehabilitations: A within-person randomized split-mouth controlled trial with a 3-year follow-up. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 23(4), 562-567. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13029.
Bittencourt, A. B. B. C., Neto, C. L. M. M., Penitente, P. A., Pellizzer, E. P., Dos Santos, D. M., & Goiato, M. C. (2021). Comparison of the Morse Cone Connection with the Internal Hexagon and External Hexagon Connections Based on Microleakage - Review. Prague Medical Report, 122(3), 181-190. https://doi.org/10.14712/23362936.2021.15.
Lazzara, R. J., & Porter, S. S. (2006). Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 26(1), 9-17.
Kowalski, J., Lapinska, B., Nissan, J., & Lukomska-Szymanska, M. (2021). Factors influencing marginal bone loss around dental implants: a narrative review. Coatings, 11(7), 865. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11070865.
Oliveira, H., Brizuela Velasco, A., Ríos-Santos, J. V., Sánchez Lasheras, F., Lemos, B. F., Gil, F. J., Carvalho, A., & Herrero-Climent, M. (2020). Effect of different implant designs on strain and stress distribution under non-axial loading: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(13), 4738. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134738.
Heimes, D., Becker, P., Pabst, A., Smeets, R., Kraus, A., Hartmann, A., Sagheb, K., & Kämmerer, P. W. (2023). How dental implant macrogeometry influences primary implant stability: A narrative review. International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 9(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00485-z.
Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., Whiting, P., & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n160.
Pozzi, A., Agliardi, E., Tallarico, M., & Barlattani, A. (2014). Clinical and radiological outcomes of two implants with different prosthetic interfaces and neck configurations: randomized, controlled, split-mouth clinical trial. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 16(1), 96-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00465.x.
Gultekin, B. A., Gultekin, P., Leblebicioglu, B., Basegmez, C., & Yalcin, S. (2013). Clinical evaluation of marginal bone loss and stability in two types of submerged dental implants. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 28(3), 815-823. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3087.
Brånemark, P. I., Hansson, B. O., Adell, R., Breine, U., Lindström, J., Hallén, O., & Ohman, A. (1977). Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Supplementum, 16, 1-132.
Bedrossian, E., & Bedrossian, E. (2019). Treatment planning the edentulous mandible. Review of biomechanical and clinical considerations: an update. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.7196.
Maier, F. M. (2016). Initial Crestal Bone Loss After Implant Placement with Flapped or Flapless Surgery - A Prospective Cohort Study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 31(4), 876-883.
Naeini, E. N., De Bruyn, H., Bronkhorst, E. M., & D'haese, J. (2023). Long-Term Effect of Guided Implant Surgery on Clinical Outcomes and Peri-Implantitis of Maxillary Implants - An Observational Cohort Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(13), 4432. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134432.
Vlahović, Z., Mihailović, B., Lazić, Z., & Golubović, M. (2013). Comparative radiographic and resonance frequency analyses of the peri-implant tissue after dental implants placement using flap and flapless techniques: an experimental study on domestic pigs. Vojnosanit Pregl, 70(6), 586-594
Bagde, H., Pawar, S. K., Hotchandani, K., Malik, N., Awasthi, V., & Patil, M. V. (2023). Healing of Peri-Implant Tissue following Flapless Implant Surgery. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, 15(Suppl 2), S1139-S1141.
Cahyaningtyas, N. A., Miranda, A., Metta, P., & Bawono, C. A. (2023). Dental implant macrodesign features in the past 10 years: A systematic review. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology, 27(2), 131-139. https://doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_676_21
Kreve, S., Ferreira, I., da Costa Valente, M. L., et al. (2022). Relationship between dental implant macro-design and osseointegration: a systematic review. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-022-01116-4.
Vandamme, K., Naert, I., Geris, L., Sloten, J. V., Puers, R., & Duyck, J. (2007). Influence of controlled immediate loading and implant design on peri-implant bone formation. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.2006.01014.x.
Alshehri, M., & Alshehri, F. (2016). Influence of Implant Shape (Tapered vs Cylindrical) on the Survival of Dental Implants Placed in the Posterior Maxilla: A Systematic Review. Implant Dentistry, 25(6), 855-860. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000490.
Sargolzaie, N., Arab, H. R., & Moghaddam, M. M. (2017). Evaluation of crestal bone resorption around cylindrical and conical implants following 6 months of loading: A randomized clinical trial. European Journal of Dentistry, 11(3), 317-322. https://doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_38_17.
Park, H., Moon, I. S., Chung, C., Shin, S. J., Huh, J. K., Yun, J. H., & Lee, D. W. (2021). Comparison of peri-implant marginal bone level changes between tapered and straight implant designs: 5-year follow-up results. Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science, 51(6), 422-432. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2101180059.
Gehrke, S. A., Júnior, J. A., Treichel, T. L. E., et al. (2022). Effects of insertion torque values on the marginal bone loss of dental implants installed in sheep mandibles. Scientific Reports, 12, 538. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04313-5.
Vandeweghe, S., Cosyn, J., Thevissen, E., Teerlinck, J., & De Bruyn, H. (2012). The influence of implant design on bone remodeling around surface-modified Southern Implants®. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 14(5), 655-662. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00308.x.
Cehreli, M., Sahin, S., & Akça, K. (2004). Role of mechanical environment and implant design on bone tissue differentiation: current knowledge and future contexts. Journal of Dentistry, 32(2), 123-132.
Nandini, N., Kunusoth, R., Alwala, A. M., Prakash, R., Sampreethi, S., & Katkuri, S. (2022). Cylindrical Implant Versus Tapered Implant: A Comparative Study. Cureus, 14(9), e29675. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.29675.
Stoilov, M., Shafaghi, R., Stark, H., Marder, M., Kraus, D., & Enkling, N. (2023). Influence of Implant Macro-Design, -Length, and -Diameter on Primary Implant Stability Depending on Different Bone Qualities Using Standard Drilling Protocols - An In Vitro Analysis. Journal of Functional Biomaterials, 14(9), 469. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14090469.
Sargolzaie, N., Arab, H. R., & Moghaddam, M. M. (2017). Evaluation of crestal bone resorption around cylindrical and conical implants following 6 months of loading: A randomized clinical trial. European Journal of Dentistry, 11(3), 317-322. https://doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_38_17.
Askar, H., Wang, I. C., Tavelli, L., Chan, H. L., & Wang, H. L. (2020). Effect of Implant Vertical Position, Design, and Surgical Characteristics on Mucosal Vertical Dimension: A Meta-Analysis of Animal Studies. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 35(3), 461-478. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.8178.
Vervaeke, S., Dierens, M., Besseler, J., & De Bruyn, H. (2014). The influence of initial soft tissue thickness on peri-implant bone remodeling. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 16(2), 238-247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00474.x.
Suárez-López Del Amo, F., Lin, G. H., Monje, A., Galindo-Moreno, P., & Wang, H. L. (2016). Influence of Soft Tissue Thickness on Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Periodontology, 87(6), 690-699.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Victor de Melo Soares; Andréa Cândido dos Reis
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
1) Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
2) Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
3) Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado.
