Cost minimization and financial impact of root canal therapy techniques: manual, rotary and reciprocating

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i11.10119

Keywords:

Evaluation of Biomedical Technology; Health Economics; Preparation of the root canal.

Abstract

The root canal therapy consists of phases aimed at cleaning and disinfection of the root canal system. The chemomechanical preparation is the one that makes use of instruments that can be used by means of mechanized techniques (rotary and reciprocation) and manual. The present study seeks to compare the three instrumentation techniques, based on cost and outcome, using the cost – minimization analysis in the perspective of the Social Service of Commerce (SESC - Brazil), and a time horizon of 10 years. The effectiveness of the techniques were raised through literature review and selection of systematic review studies. The costs were measured by the microcosting technique, in addition to the information from the SESC databases. In the analyzed period, the study shows that the use of the rotary system can increase the capacity of care by 44,67%, while the reciprocation system by 168 %.  The financial impact would be R$ 103,683.87 and R$ 735,179.46 for the rotary and reciprocation, respectively. Using as reference the conventional technique, R$ 44.58 more is spent for the treatment with rotary instruments and R$ 84,03 for the reciprocation. Even with the highest allocating efficiency for the reciprocating technique with much greater coverage, the budget impact needs to be analyzed with caution. The incorporation of reciprocating technology demonstrating to be the technique with the highest allocating efficiency, best minimization cost ratio and reasonable cost of additional treatment in relation to other techniques.

References

Almeida, D. O., Chaves, S. C., Souza, R. A., & Soares, F. F. (2017). Outcome of Single-vs Multiple-visit Endodontic Therapy of Nonvital Teeth: A Meta-analysis.

Brasil. Secretaria de Ciência T e IE. (2014). Methodological guideline: economic evaluation of health technologies. Ministério da Saúde. Recuperado de http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/diretrizes_metodologicas_diretriz_avaliacao_economica.pdf

Bueno, C. S. P., de Oliveira, D. P., Pelegrine, R. A., Fontana, C. E., Rocha, D. G. P., & da Silveira Bueno, C. E. (2017). Fracture incidence of WaveOne and Reciproc files during root canal preparation of up to 3 posterior teeth: a prospective clinical study.

Journal of Endodontics, 43(5), 705-708.

Bürklein, S., Hinschitza, K., Dammaschke, T., & Schäfer, E. (2012). Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single‐file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. International endodontic journal, 45(5), 449-461.

Chubb, D. W. R. (2019). A review of the prognostic value of irrigation on root canal treatment success. Australian Endodontic Journal, 45(1), 5-11.

Chugal, N., Mallya, S. M., Kahler, B., & Lin, L. M. (2017). Endodontic treatment outcomes. Dental Clinics, 61(1), 59-80.

da Silva Etges, A. P. B., Paixão Schlatter, R., Lavanholi Neyeloff, J., Vianna Araújo, D., Bahia, L. R., Cruz, L., ... & Anne Polanczyk, C. (2019). Estudos de Microcusteio aplicados a avaliações econômicas em saúde: uma proposta metodológica para o Brasil. JBES: Brazilian Journal of Health Economics/Jornal Brasileiro de Economia da Saúde, 11(1).

De Deus, Q. D. (1992). Obturação do canal radicular. Endodontia. 5ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Medsi, 462-506.

De Mello Vianna, C. M., & Caetano, R. (2009). Methodological Guidelines: Economic Evaluation of Health Technologies. Brazil: Ministry of Health.

de Oliveira, E. P. (2011). Comparative study between manual and rotatory instrumentation techniques to remove the smear layer. RGO: Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia, 59(3).

Del Fabbro, M., Afrashtehfar, K. I., Corbella, S., El-Kabbaney, A., Perondi, I., & Taschieri, S. (2018). In vivo and in vitro effectiveness of rotary nickel-titanium vs manual stainless steel instruments for root canal therapy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Evidence Based Dental Practice, 18(1), 59-69.

Dentsply Brasil. (2020). RECIPROC BLUE - Instructions for Use. Recuperado de http://www.dentsply.com.br/bulas/diretory/R/VDW-Reciproc-Blue.pdf.

Dentsply Sirona. (2020). Protaper Next – Instructions for Use. Recuperado de http://www.dentsply.com.br/bulas/diretory/p/protaper-next.pdf.

Ehrhardt, I. C., Zuolo, M. L., Cunha, R. S., De Martin, A. S., Kherlakian, D., de Carvalho, M. C. C., & Bueno, C. E. D. S. (2012). Assessment of the separation incidence of mtwo files used with preflaring: prospective clinical study. Journal of endodontics, 38(8), 1078-1081.

European Society of Endodontology. (2006). Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. International Endodontic Journal, 39(12), 921-930.

Fernandes, J. D. K. B., Pinho, J. R. O., Queiroz, R. C. D. S., & Thomaz, E. B. A. F. (2016). Avaliação dos indicadores de saúde bucal no Brasil: tendência evolutiva pró-equidade?. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 32, e00021115.

Gavini, G., Santos, M. D., Caldeira, C. L., Machado, M. E. D. L., Freire, L. G., Iglecias, E. F., ... & Candeiro, G. T. D. M. (2018). Nickel–titanium instruments in endodontics: a concise review of the state of the art. Brazilian oral research, 32.

Guelzow, A., Stamm, O., Martus, P., & Kielbassa, A. M. (2005). Comparative study of six rotary nickel–titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation. International endodontic journal, 38(10), 743-752.

Gutmann, J. L., & Gao, Y. (2012). Alteration in the inherent metallic and surface properties of nickel–titanium root canal instruments to enhance performance, durability and safety: a focused review. International endodontic journal, 45(2), 113-128.

Matos Neto, M., Santos, S. S. F., Leão, M. V. P., Habitante, S. M., Rodrigues, J. R. D. D., & Jorge, A. O. C. (2012). Effectiveness of three instrumentation systems to remove Enterococcus faecalis from root canals. International endodontic journal, 45(5), 435-438.

Neelakantan, P., Ahmed, H. M. A., Chang, J. W. W., Nabhan, M. S., Wei, X., Cheung, G. S. P., & Gomes, B. P. (2019). Effect of instrumentation systems on endotoxin reduction from root canal systems: A systematic review of clinical studies and meta‐analysis. Australian Endodontic Journal, 45(3), 407-413.

Park, S. K., Kim, Y. J., Shon, W. J., You, S. Y., Moon, Y. M., Kim, H. C., & Lee, W. (2014). Clinical efficiency and reusability of the reciprocating nickel–titanium instruments according to the root canal anatomy. Scanning: The Journal of Scanning Microscopies, 36(2), 246-251.

Peralta-Mamani, M., Rios, D., Duarte, M. A. H., JF, S. J., & Honorio, H. M. (2019). Manual vs. rotary instrumentation in endodontic treatment of permanent teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. American journal of dentistry, 32(6), 311-324.

Pinto, M., Santos, M., & Trajman, A. (2016). Limiar de custo-efetividade: uma necessidade para o Brasil. J Bras Econ Saúde, 8(1), 58-60.

Schwendicke, F., & Göstemeyer, G. (2016). Cost-effectiveness of single-versus multistep root canal treatment. Journal of endodontics, 42(10), 1446-1452.

Siddique, R., & Nivedhitha, M. S. (2019). Effectiveness of rotary and reciprocating systems on microbial reduction: A systematic review. Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD, 22(2), 114.

Silva, E. N. D., Silva, M. T., & Pereira, M. G. (2016). Health economic evaluation studies: definition and applicability to health systems and services. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, 25(1), 205-207.

Siqueira Junior, J. F., Rôças, I. D. N., Marceliano-Alves, M. F., Pérez, A. R., & Ricucci, D. (2018). Unprepared root canal surface areas: causes, clinical implications, and therapeutic strategies. Brazilian oral research, 32.

Vaudt, J., Bitter, K., Neumann, K., & Kielbassa, A. M. (2009). Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel–titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments. International endodontic journal, 42(1), 22-33.

Yared, G. (2008). Canal preparation using only one Ni‐Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations. International endodontic journal, 41(4), 339-344.

You, S. Y., Baek, S. H., Kum, K. Y., Shon, W. J., & Lee, W. (2010). Lifespan of one nickel-titanium rotary file with reciprocating motion in curved root canals. Journal of Endodontics, 36(12), 1991-1994.

Downloads

Published

21/11/2020

How to Cite

Pinheiro, P. S. M., Garcia, S. L. da S., Machado, V. C. M. ., Simoes, A. C. C. D., Merchan , L. P. ., Raimundo , A. C. S., Cavalcante , D. de F. B., & Pereira, A. C. . (2020). Cost minimization and financial impact of root canal therapy techniques: manual, rotary and reciprocating. Research, Society and Development, 9(11), e46291110119. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i11.10119

Issue

Section

Health Sciences