Beliefs Effectiveness of Teachers and Teaching Context Variables Beliefs Effectiveness of Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i12.10576Keywords:
Teaching self-efficacy; Collective efficacy of teachers; Teaching context.Abstract
This study investigated the association of self teaching self-effectiveness with collective efficacy, as well as variables related to the teaching context. The study gathered 495 teachers, including 104 male and 391 female participants, distributed in Early Childhood Education, Primary and Secondary Schools, in a denominational system of private schools in Pará, Amapá and Maranhão. It was applied the Characterization Questionnaire, the Teaching Beliefs Scale and Educational Public Belief. For data analysis it was used Sampling, Factor Analysis and Correspondence Analysis. Among the results, it was found that the teacher takes into account some factors present in the teaching environment that interfere with the beliefs of efficacy. This survey added information about the environmental factors that favor - or not - better teaching strategies, taking into account the context in which they live and their own abilities to work in the teaching environment, with important implications for the teaching-learning process.
References
Alvarenga, C. E. A., & Azzi, R. G. (2013). Relações significantes entre autoeficácia computacional docente e variáveis pessoais e contextuais: Um estudo com professores brasileiros. Educação, formação e tecnologias, 6, 50-67.
Bandura, A. (1997). The anatomy of stages of change. American Journal of Health Promotion, 12, 8-10.
Batdi, V. (2014). The German teacher trainers’ self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 2(4), 23–31. doi:10.11114/jets.v2i4.490.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (2011). Bioecologia do Desenvolvimento Humano: Tornando os seres humanos mais humanos. A. Carvalho-Barreto (Trad.). Porto Alegre: Artmed.
Bzuneck, A. J. (1996). Crenças de autoeficácia de professoras do 1º grau e sua relação com outras variáveis de predição e de contexto. Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia, 48, (4), 57-89.
Carlotto, M. S., Dias, S. R. S., Batista, J. B. V., & Diehl, L. (2015). O papel mediador da autoeficácia na relação entre a sobrecarga de trabalho e as dimensões de Burnout em professores. Psico-USF, 20 (1) 13-23.
Duso, E. M., & Sudbrack, A. P. (2010). Políticas educacionais: Textos, contextos e práticas – possíveis interfaces. Vivências: Revista Eletrônica de Extensão da URI, 6, 65-80.
Fernandez, A. P. O., Ramos, M. F. H., Nina, K. C. F., Pontes, F. A. R. (2016). Overview of research on teacher self-efficacy in social cognitive perspective. Anales de Psicologia, 32, 3, 703-802. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.32.3.220171.
Guerreiro Casanova, D. C. G., & Azzi, R. G. (2015). Análise sobre variáveis explicativas da autoeficácia docente. Educar em Revista, 58, 237-252.
Guerreiro Casanova, D. C. & Russo, M. H. (2016). Crenças de autoeficácia de gestores escolares: Variáveis relacionadas. Psic. da Ed., 42, 1-11. Recuperado de http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-69752016000100001.
Iaochitte, R. T.; Costa Filho, R. A; Matos, M. M., & Sachimbombo, K. M. C. (2016). Autoeficácia no Campo Educacional: Revisão das publicações em periódicos brasileiro. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, 1, 45-54. Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2175-3539/2016/0201922.
Pereira, A. S. et al (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. [free ebook]. Santa Maria: UAB/NTE/UFSM. Recuperado de: https://www.ufsm.br/app/uploads/sites/358/20 19/02/Metodologia-da-Pesquisa-Cientifica_final.pdf.
Prodanov, C. C. & Freitas, E. C. (2013). Metodologia do Trabalho Científico: Métodos e Técnicas da Pesquisa e do Trabalho Acadêmico. Novo Hamburgo: Feevale.
Ramos, E. M. L. S., Almeida, S. S., & Araújo, A. R. (Orgs.). (2008). Segurança pública: Uma abordagem estatística e computacional.[Public safety: A statistical and computacional approach]. Belém: Editora Universitária.
Ramos, M. F. H., Silva, S. C., & Pontes, F. A. R. (2015). Panorama das Pesquisas Sobre Crenças Coletivas de Eficácia Docente. Revista da Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia, 29, 33-46.
Ramos, M. F. H., Silva, S. S. C. E., Fernandez, A. P. O., & Pontes, F. A. R. (2016). Revisão Sistemática De Pesquisas Sobre Eficácia Coletiva Docente. Interação Em Psicologia, 20,236-242.
Ramos, M. F. H., Fernandez, A. P. O., Pontes, F. A. R., & Silva, S. S. C. (2016). Caracterização das Pesquisas sobre Eficácia Coletiva Docente na Perspectiva da Teoria Social Cognitiva. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 32, 1, 91-99 Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-37722016012227091099
Ramos, M, F. H., Silva, J. G. C., Silva, E. P., Rodrigues, A. L. L. S. M., & Garcia, L. A. (2018). Panorama of The Beliefs of Self-Efficacy In Basic Education Teachers. International Journal of Development Research, 08, 20140.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Barr, M. (2004). Fostering student learning: The relationship of collective teacher efficacy and student achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3, 187-207. doi:10.1080/15700760490503706.
Yalçin, F. A. (2014). Investigation of science teacher candidates’ self-efficacy beliefs of science teaching with respect to some variables. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(3), 1046–1063.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Ana Patrícia de Oliveira Fernandez; Maély Ferreira Holanda Ramos; Edson Marcos Leal Soares Ramos; Karla Cristina Furtado Nina; Simone Souza Costa Silva; Fernando Augusto Ramos Pontes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.